Council archive · source document
Judgment - Stockwell v Noosa Council - PEC Appeal 1998 of 2024 - 26.06.25 · MCU22/0094
Very large file (21.6 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 49, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
BHA Report forLot 4 Noosa Civic, Hoffman Drive, Noosaville
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Compliance
PO7 AO7 Not Applicable
Lot design and building siting Each residential lot:
minimises bushfire hazard risk to 1. includes a building envelope,
people and property. identified on a plan of
subdivision;
2. is of sufficient size and shape
to allow for efficient
emergency access to buildings
for fire fighting appliances
(e.g. by avoiding battle-
axe/hatchet lots and long
narrow lots with
long access driveways to
buildings);
3. where more than 2500m²,
achieves setbacks from
hazardous vegetation in line
with Bushfire Attack Level 29
requirements as per AS3959;
and
4. is designed so
that buildings and structures ar
e sited in locations of lowest
hazard within the lot and
elements of the development
least susceptible to fire are
closest to the fire hazard.
+ Bushfire assessments
+ Property vegetation assessments
+ Site planning for bushfire
+ Property management for bushfire
+ Bushfire management plans
47
Bushfire Planning Specalists - qldbushfireplanning.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Judgment - Stockwell v Noosa Council - PEC Appeal 1998 of 2024 - 26.06.25.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 21.6 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.