Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU25 0057, OPW25 0078 & RAL25 0010 (As Published) · MCU25/0057

               The proposed development is considered to satisfy the relevant performance outcomes of PO12
               of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code.
               Roof Forms
               Acceptable Outcome AO19.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code states:

                   AO19.1
                   With the exception of Noosa Heads and Coastal Communities Local Areas, the main roof of
                   the building has a roof pitch no less than 5 degrees and has minimum 600 millimetre eaves to
                   at least 75% of the perimeter of the building.

               The applicant proposes a roof form with 600mm eaves to less than 75% of the perimeter of the
               building and therefore does not meet AO19.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code.
               The proposal is therefore required to comply with corresponding Performance Outcome PO19 of
               the Medium Density Residential Zone Code, which states:

                   PO19
                   Roof forms:
                   a.     contribute positively to the local skyline;
                   b.     complement the character of the locality and the topography of the site;
                   c.     avoid box profiles/parapets; and
                   d.     do not create opportunities for overlooking the private open space or internal spaces of
                          neighbouring properties.

               The proposed roof form contributes positively to the streetscape and broader urban skyline through
               the articulation of the building’s façade along George Street. This is achieved by incorporating
               generous eave projections, with the majority extending to 600mm, which enhances visual depth
               and shadowing. Additionally, the inclusion of 200mm eaves to the rest of the front façade along
               with a 5-degree roof pitch effectively mitigates the appearance of a box-like profile, promoting a
               more refined and contextually responsive architectural expression. The proposed roof form
               compliments the character of the locality by


               4.       CONSULTATION
               4.1. Referral Agencies
               Not Applicable
               4.2. Internal Council Referrals
               The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment:
               •     Development Engineer, Development Assessment
               SCG Consulting Engineers provide a RPEQ response to the engineering issued raised in the
               information request. The response has appropriately addressed the issues raised.
               The vehicle turning path plans are showing a 1.2m footpath, the other plans and reporting confirms
               a 1.5m footpath is proposed as requested. Appropriate conditions and annotations can address
               the issue.
               MCU and OPW components have addressed all relevant conditions, no RAL conditions required.
               •    Coordinator Engineering and Environment, Development Assessment
               The application material has addressed the RFI by providing a set of detailed landscape plans.



                                                                                                      Page 9 of 25

Document Set ID: 24104255
Version: 15, Version Date: 15/10/2025