Council archive · source document
LATE RFI - arborist report · MCU23/0109
ARBORIST INSPECTION 20 KAURI ST COOROY Site Observations The proposed development footprint Tree Details Tree Botanical Name Height Width DBH SRZ Age Health Structure ULE Risk Arborist Assessment Number Common Name (mm) (m) rating Risk Mitigation Works 1 Eucalyptus territicornus 20 6 700 3.57 M G FG 15 to Low Arborist Assessment Child Care Centre 40 This tree presents and resides I. the neighbouring property typically for the species. property and its age profile with its forest form and being on the fringe of a bushland corridor. We have identified its Structural Root Zone which is typically the most critical portion the tree when development encroaches on the urban forest. From my site inspection and without the build footprint as a reference there appears to be no conflict with design and tree protection. But should there be once the site mark-up is done and there is encroachment within? the TPZ and SRZ then tree protection protocols outlined in AS4970-2009 relative. to the works be implemented prior to physical works being started and all be done. under the supervision of the Project Arborist. 2 Eucalyptus territicornus 20 8 720 3.69 M G FG 15 to Low This tree presents and resides in the rear of the property and appears outside the 40 property borders It presents typically for the species and age profile with its forest form and being on the fringe of a bushland corridor. We have identified its Structural Root Zone which is typically the most critical portion the tree when development encroaches on the urban forest. From my site inspection and without the build footprint as a reference there appears to be no conflict with design and tree protection. But should there be once the site mark-up is done and there is encroachment within? the TPZ and SRZ then tree protection protocols outlined in AS4970-2009 relative. to the works be implemented prior to physical works being started and all be done. under the supervision of the Project Arborist. 3 Numerous juvenile species 3 1 100 0.5 J G G 40+ Low These trees present typically for the species and have no impact on the proposed development and the TPZ and SRZ have no impact on the proposed construction 4 Melaleuca quinquinervia 12 7 390 2.10 SM/M G G 40+ Low This tree presents and resides in the rear of the property and appears outside the property borders It presents typically for the species and age profile with its forest form and being on
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
LATE RFI - arborist report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.