Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-05-16 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

of 22

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

                       AGENDA


            Ordinary Meeting

               Thursday, 16 May 2019

                    commencing at 6pm
 Cooran Memorial School of Arts Hall, 14 King Street, Cooran Hall




Crs Tony Wellington (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson, Joe Jurisevic,
Frank Pardon, Brian Stockwell, Frank Wilkie



                    “Noosa Shire – different by nature”
Log in to download the original file

2019-05-16 Ordinary Meeting Agenda(PDF, 780KB).pdf · 798 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 21 sections

Section 2

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                        16 MAY 2019


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM                                                               PAGE

1      ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES                                           3

2      CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES                                          3

3      MAYORAL MINUTES                                                  3

4      PETITIONS                                                        3

5      NOTIFIED MOTIONS                                                 3

6      CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS                       4

       PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS                 4

       SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS                8

       GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS                               11

7      ORDINARY MEETING REPORTS                                        15

       1   UPDATE ON PROPOSED FLIGHT PATH CHANGES FOR SUNSHINE COAST
           AIRPORT                                                     15

8      CLOSED SESSION                                            22

9      NEXT MEETING                                                    22

10     MEETING CLOSURE                                                 22




                                                               Page 2 of 22

Section 3

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                          16 MAY 2019



1   ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES




2   CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

    The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 18 April 2019 be received and confirmed.




3   MAYORAL MINUTES




4   PETITIONS




5   NOTIFIED MOTIONS

    Nil.




                                                                                 Page 3 of 22

Section 4

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                     16 MAY 2019


6    CONSIDERATION OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
7 MAY 2019 - Crs Brian Stockwell (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson and Tony Wellington
Other Councillors in attendance: Crs Frank Pardon and Frank Wilkie

1    MCU18/0114 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR
     ENTERTAINMENT AND DINING BUSINESS TYPE 2 - RECREATION, AMUSEMENT &
     FITNESS - (GYM) AT 33 RENE STREET, NOOSAVILLE
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:        Cr Glasgow
     Seconded:     Cr Wellington
     That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 regarding Application No. MCU18/0114 for a
     Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Entertainment & Dining Type 2 Recreation,
     Amusement & Fitness (Gym) situated at 33 Rene St, Noosaville and:
     A.    Approve the application in accordance with the following conditions:
           PLANNING
           When Conditions must be Complied With
           1.      Unless otherwise stated, all conditions of this Decision Notice must be complied
                   with, and then compliance maintained at all times while the use continues.
           Approved Plans
           2.      Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply
                   with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the
                   following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
                Plan No.    Rev.    Plan/Document Name                               Date
                A103        A05     Site Plan, drawn by Collins Building Designs     28.03.2019
                A105        A05     Ground Floor Plan, drawn by Collins Building     28.03.2019
                                    Designs
                A106        A05     Vehicle Manoeuvrability Plan, drawn by Collins   28.03.2019
                                    Building Designs
                A107        A05     Upper Floor Plan, drawn by Collins Building      28.03.2019
                                    Designs
                A201        A05     North & East Elevations, drawn by Collins        28.03.2019
                                    Building Designs
                A202        A05     South & West Elevations, drawn by Collins        28.03.2019
                                    Building Designs

                   Nature and Extent of Approved Use
           3.      Classes must have a minimum 15 minute break between the conclusion of a class
                   and the beginning of the next.
           4.      Classes must be limited to no more than 8 clients at any one time.
           5.      The total number of employees on the site at any one time must not exceed 2.
           6.      The approved use must not operate outside the hours of 5:00am to 7:00pm
                   Monday to Friday and 6:30am to 9:00am Saturday.


                                                                                            Page 4 of 22

Section 5

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                            16 MAY 2019


        Carparking and Access
        7.    The 7 client car parking spaces at the rear of the site and the 2 staff car parking
              spaces at the front of the site must be line marked and maintained as per the
              approved plans, for the life of the development.
        Bicycle Parking
        8.    Bicycle parking must be provided on site for a minimum of 3 bicycle spaces and in
              accordance with AS2890.3 Bicycle Parking Facilities. The bicycle spaces may be
              located inside the building or in the landscaped area. If located within the
              landscaped area, bicycle parking facilities must not appear as a dominating feature
              of the site landscaping.
        Landscaping
        9.    A minimum of 15% of the site must be retained as landscaped area.
        10.   Landscaping of the site is to be carried out in accordance with a Development
              Permit for Operational Works. An application for Operational Works must be
              submitted to Council within 60 business days of the approval date and must be
              carried out on the site within 90 business days of the Operational Works approval
              date, unless further agreed in writing by Council. The landscaped areas must be
              in accordance with the approved site plan and Planning Scheme Policy PSP03
              Landscaping plants and guidelines.
        Noise
        11.   Noise nuisance beyond the boundary of the site shall not exceed the levels
              specified in Table 1 and 2.
                                       Table 1 – Monday to Friday

                              NOISE LIMITS AT A RESIDENTIAL RECEPTOR

              PERIOD           Noise level at a residential place measured as the adjusted
                               maximum sound pressure level (Lamax, adj,T)
              5am – 7am        Inaudible
              7am – 7pm        Background noise level plus 5 dB(A)
                                 NOISE LEVELS AT COMMERCIAL PLACE
              PERIOD           Noise level at a commercial place measured as the adjusted
                               maximum sound pressure level (Lamax, adj,T)
              5am – 7am        Background noise level plus 8 dB(A)
              7am – 7pm        Background noise level plus 10 dB(A)

                                           Table 2 - Saturday

                              NOISE LIMITS AT A RESIDENTIAL RECEPTOR

              PERIOD           Noise level at a residential place measured as the adjusted
                               maximum sound pressure level (Lamax, adj,T)
              6:30am – 7am     Inaudible
              7am – 9am        Background noise level plus 5 dB(A)
                                 NOISE LEVELS AT COMMERCIAL PLACE
              PERIOD           Noise level at a commercial place measured as the adjusted
                               maximum sound pressure level (Lamax, adj,T)
              6:30am – 7am     Background noise level plus 8 dB(A)
              7am – 9am        Background noise level plus 10 dB(A)


                                                                                    Page 5 of 22

Section 6

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                              16 MAY 2019


         Amenity
         12.    The development must be undertaken and operated in a manner that causes no
                detrimental effect upon the amenity of the area by reason of the creation of
                excessive noise, lighting nuisance or other emissions.
         Advertising Signage
         13.    Any advertising sign or device must comply with Council’s policies on advertising.
    B.   Find the following are sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict with
         the Planning Scheme:
         1.     Gyms (fitness centres) are generally floor area intensive and require tenancies that
                are most readily found in the Industrial Zone;
         2.     Some sport and recreational uses are accepted in the Industry zone given the
                limited potential impacts of sport and recreation uses; and
         3.     The fitness centre is of a similar size and scale to other approved Entertainment &
                Dining Business’s Type 2 within the Noosaville Industrial area.
    C.   Advise the applicant that the existing unapproved building addition along the northern
         boundary must be removed to provide access to the rear carpark, within 90 business
         days of the Operational Works approval date, unless further agreed in writing by Council.
    D.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                                        Carried.




2   PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDMENTS - ADVERTISING DEVICES
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Jackson
    Seconded:        Cr Glasgow
    That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 2 be referred to the General Committee
    due to the significance of the issue.
                                                                                     Carried.




3   NOOSA SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE - STAGE 1 REPORT
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Wellington
    Seconded:        Cr Jackson
    That Planning & Environment Committee Agenda Item 3 be referred to the General Committee
    due to the significance of the issue.
                                                                                     Carried.




                                                                                      Page 6 of 22

Section 7

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                           16 MAY 2019


4    UPDATE ON YUROL / RINGTAIL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:           Cr Wellington
     Seconded:        Cr Glasgow
     That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Planning & Environment
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 and note the positive progress in the implementation of
     the Yurol / Ringtail Environmental Project.
                                                                                       Carried.




5    ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT UPDATE - 3RD
     QUARTER 2018-19
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:           Cr Glasgow
     Seconded:        Cr Jackson
     That Council note the report by the Director Environment and Sustainable Development to the
     Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on
     operations of the Environment and Sustainable Development Department for the period 1
     January to 31 March 2019.
                                                                                       Carried.




Recommendation

The Planning & Environment Committee recommendations dated 7 May 2019 be adopted except
where dealt with or held over by separate resolution.




                                                                                   Page 7 of 22

Section 8

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                              16 MAY 2019


SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
7 MAY 2019 – Crs Joe Jurisevic (Chair), Frank Pardon, Tony Wellington & Frank Wilkie
Other Councillors in attendance: Nil

1    TOURISM NOOSA SPONSORED EVENTS 2019-20 - TEMPORARY EVENT PERMIT
     APPROVALS
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:            Cr Wellington
     Seconded:         Cr Pardon
     That Council note the report by the Property Manager to the Services & Organisation
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 and:
     A.    Note the list of events provided by Tourism Noosa proposed for conditional sponsorship
           in Attachment 1 to this report to 31 July 2020 which is a requirement of the funding
           agreement between Council and Tourism Noosa;
     B.    Provide in-principle approval of those events subject to each event submitting a
           Temporary Event Application, satisfactory assessment and provision of appropriate
           permit conditions to manage each event;
     C.    Not provide in-principle approval for the Maze Art Street Village 2019 event or the Beach
           Club 2019 event but consider these events at a later date subject to each receiving
           stakeholder support from the Hastings Street Association; and
     D.    Note event applications received within 4 months of the proposed event commencement
           date will be charged additional administrative fees relating to the necessary resourcing
           impact resulting from the reduction in the timeframe for application assessment.
                                                                                           Carried.


2    NAMING OF THE NOOSA BOTANIC GARDENS SHADE HOUSE
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:            Cr Wellington
     Seconded:         Cr Pardon
     That Council note the report by the Project Support Officer to the Services & Organisation
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 and agreed to name the Noosa Botanic Gardens shade
     house the “Noosa Botanic Shade Garden”.
                                                                                           Carried.


3    OPERATIONAL PLAN PROGRESS REPORT - 3RD QUARTER 2018-19
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:            Cr Wilkie
     Seconded:         Cr Pardon
     That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Services & Organisation
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on progress with the
     implementation of the Operational Plan to 31 March 2019 and details of Council’s Key
     Performance Indicators.
                                                                                           Carried.

                                                                                      Page 8 of 22

Section 9

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                             16 MAY 2019


4   CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE - 3RD QUARTER 2018-19
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Pardon
    Seconded:        Cr Wilkie
    That Council note the report by the Director Corporate Services to the Services & Organisation
    Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on operations of the Corporate
    Services Department for the period 1 January to 31 March 2019.
                                                                                         Carried.




5   COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE - 3RD QUARTER 2018-19
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Wellington
    Seconded:        Cr Jurisevic
    That Council note the report by the Director Community Services to the Services &
    Organisation Committee meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on the operations of
    the Community Services Department for the period 1 January to 31 March 2019.
                                                                                         Carried.




6   CAPITAL PROGRAM DELIVERY STATUS - 3RD QUARTER 2018-19
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Pardon
    Seconded:        Cr Jurisevic
    That Council note the report by the Asset Planning Manager to the Services & Organisation
    Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on the projects being delivered
    throughout the 2018/19 Capital Program.
                                                                                         Carried.




7   INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE - 3RD QUARTER 2018-2019
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:            Cr Wilkie
    Seconded:         Cr Wellington
    That Council note the report by the Director Infrastructure Services to the Services &
    Organisation Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on operations of the
    Infrastructure Services Department for the period 1 January to 31 March 2019.
                                                                                         Carried.




                                                                                    Page 9 of 22

Section 10

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                              16 MAY 2019


8    EXECUTIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPDATE - 3RD QUARTER 2018-19
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:           Cr Jurisevic
     Seconded:        Cr Pardon
     That Council note the report by the Director Executive Services to the Services & Organisation
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 providing an update on operations of the Executive
     Services Department for the period 1 January to 31 March 2019.
                                                                                          Carried.




Recommendation

The Services & Organisation Committee recommendations dated 7 May 2019 be adopted except
where dealt with or held over by separate resolution.




                                                                                    Page 10 of 22

Section 11

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                              16 MAY 2019


GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
13 May 2019 - Crs. Frank Wilkie (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson, Frank Pardon, Brian
Stockwell and Tony Wellington
Apology: Cr Joe Jurisevic

1    PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDMENTS - ADVERTISING DEVICES
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:           Cr Stockwell
     Seconded:        Cr Glasgow
     That Council note the report by the Principal Strategic Planner to the Planning & Environment
     Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 and resolve:
     A.   In accordance with Section 29 of the Local Government Act 2009 (“the Act”), to propose
          to make:
          i.     Administration (Amendment) Local Law (No.1) 2019 contained in Attachment 1;
                 and
          ii.    Administration and Other Subordinate Local Law (Amendment) Subordinate Local
                 Law (No. 1) 2019 contained in Attachment 2, subject to the following changes:
                 a)   that Schedule 10. 5 (b) be amended as follows:
                      (b)   if the premises on which the advertising device is installed is a
                            shopping centre, the sign face area of all advertising devices on the
                            shopping centre must not exceed whichever is the lesser of –
                            (i)    a combination of –
                                   (A)   if the building comprising the shopping centre has 1 or
                                         more street front boundaries – 10m2 for each shopping
                                         centre building façade with a direct street frontage; and
                                   (B)   if the building comprising the shopping centre has 1 or
                                         more off-street parking areas – 10m2 for each shopping
                                         centre building façade with an off-street parking area; and
                            (ii)   a combination of –
                                   (A)   if the building comprising the shopping centre has 1 or
                                         more street front boundaries – 0.75m2 per linear
                                         metre for each shopping centre building façade with a
                                         direct street frontage; and
                                   (B)   if the building comprising the shopping centre has 1 or
                                         more off-street parking areas – 0.75m2 per linear metre of
                                         the boundary of each shopping centre building façade
                                         which abuts an off-street parking area: and
                 b)    retain the maximum sign face area of 4sqm for individual advertising devices
                       throughout Noosa Shire, regardless of zone or location.
     B.   To delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to make the consequential and
          clarification changes to Administration and Other Subordinate Local Law (Amendment)
          Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 prior to consultation with state government agencies
          and public notification;




                                                                                     Page 11 of 22

Section 12

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                               16 MAY 2019


    BC. In accordance with Council’s Local Law Making Process Policy:
        i.    to consult with the public about the proposed local law amendments contained in
              Attachment 1 and subordinate local law amendments contained in Attachment 2
              as required by the Policy; and
        ii.   to consult with relevant state government agencies on proposed Administration
              (Amendment) Local Law (No.1) 2019 and delegate authority to the Chief Executive
              Officer to make changes in response to state comments;
    CD. In accordance with Section 257 of the Act to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer its
        powers under section 38 of the Act and section 15 of the Local Government Regulation
        2012 to decide—
        i.    how the public interest test of the local law and subordinate local law outlined in
              the schedule contained in Attachment 3 is to be conducted; and
        ii.   the matters with which the public interest test report in relation to the local law and
              subordinate local law outlined in the schedule must deal; and
          iii.   the consultation process for the public interest test and how the process is to be
                 used in the public interest test.
                                                                                          Carried.




2   NOOSA SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE - STAGE 1 REPORT
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:            Cr Wellington
    Seconded:         Cr Pardon
    That Council note the report by the Director Environment & Sustainable Development to the
    Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 7 May 2019 and:
    A.    Note the Stage 1 report undertaken by CSIRO titled ‘Noosa Sustainability Institute -
          Defining a World Class Sustainability Research Institute in Noosa - Options and Potential
          Structures’ (provided as Attachment 1) and the Addendum to the report summarising
          local examples of sustainability focussed organisations, action and research (provided
          as Attachment 2);
    B.    Endorse advancing this concept through the identification of existing sustainability
          activity, research and action including consideration of establishing a portal/repository
          for research and outcomes and creating a network across all those already in the space;
    C.    Undertake further engagement and consultation with key local organisations, institutes,
          community members and experts in this space to advance the idea and further identify
          activity and research that should be captured; and
    D.    Report back to Council at a future meeting on progress and potential next steps.
                                                                                            Carried.




                                                                                     Page 12 of 22

Section 13

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                16 MAY 2019


3.   MCU18 0165 REQUEST FOR NEGOTIATED DECISION NOTICE FOR MULTIPLE
     HOUSING - TYPE 4 CONVENTIONAL (17 DWELLING UNITS) AT 25 KAURI STREET
     COOROY
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:            Cr Jackson
     Seconded:         Cr Wellington
     That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the General Committee Meeting
     dated 13 May 2019 regarding representations made to Development Approval No.
     MCU18/0165 for Multiple Housing - Type 4 Conventional situated at 25 Kauri St Cooroy and:
     A.   Agree to change conditions 21 and 29 as follows:
          21.    The full length of the Kauri Street and Olivine Street frontages of the development
                 site must be upgraded by providing kerb & channel, bitumen road widening,
                 stormwater structures and landscaping improvements to the footpath in
                 accordance with an Operational Works approval. The works must include but are
                 not limited to the following:
                 21.1. In regard to the Kauri Street frontage, the new kerb and channel must be
                       aligned so that it is offset 8 metres from the existing kerb and channel on the
                       western side of Kauri Street measured from the nominal face of the kerb. The
                       new works must be extended to the north of the subject site and be generally
                       in accordance with drawing number 2018068 – Dwg 04 of 24 titled External
                       Works Layout Plan dated March 2019 prepared by 360 Civil Consulting and
                       join smoothly with the existing formation.
                 21.2. In regard to the Olivine Street frontage the new kerb and channel must be
                       aligned at about 12m offset from and parallel to the property boundary and
                       must extend for the full frontage of the subject site. The works shall include
                       suitable tapers extending beyond the frontage of the subject site to smoothly
                       join to the existing pavement.
                 21.3. The works (Kauri Street, Olivine Street and the intersection) must include
                       suitable drainage structures and stormwater collection to ensure that runoff
                       from the road formation is collected, controlled and directed to ensure that
                       the roadway is safely trafficable and must be in compliance with the relevant
                       sections of the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM).
                 21.4. As part of the application for operational works, the developer’s civil
                       engineering consultant shall investigate and report on the possible
                       deficiencies in the existing stormwater system, to the western end of Agate
                       Street and including inspection by closed circuit television (CCTV) of the
                       existing stormwater system. The developer is required to rectify any deficient
                       stormwater pipes or structures extending from the development frontage
                       down to and including the manhole downstream of the 600x1200 box culvert
                       which crosses Kauri Street.
                 21.5. The design and construction of all works shall be carried out in accordance
                       with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy PSP05 – Engineering Design
                       Standards – Roads, Drainage and Earthworks and the applicable
                       engineering standards current at the time of construction. The above
                       condition is imposed pursuant to s145 of the Planning Act 2016 being non-
                       trunk infrastructure.




                                                                                      Page 13 of 22

Section 14

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                             16 MAY 2019


          29.    A CCTV inspection must be carried out by a Council approved CCTV contractor
                 upon satisfactory completion of construction works that are to become a Council
                 asset. The developer will be responsible for the full cost of CCTV inspection,
                 including any additional inspection necessary following defect identification and
                 rectification.
     B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                                         Carried.


4.   PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO 4339 OF 2018 - DEVELOPMENT
     APPROVAL FOR OPERATIONAL WORKS (SIGNAGE) OPW18/163 AT 140-142 EUMUNDI
     NOOSA ROAD, NOOSAVILLE
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:           Cr Wellington
     Seconded:        Cr Glasgow
     That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the General
     Committee Meeting dated 13 May 2019 regarding Planning & Environment Court Appeal No.
     4339 of 2018 and agree to settle the appeal generally in accordance with the amended
     conditions set out in Attachment 2.
                                                                                   Carried.



5.   FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT - APRIL 2019
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:             Cr Wilkie
     Seconded:          Cr Jackson
     That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services to the General Committee
     Meeting dated 13 May 2019 outlining April 2019 year to date financial performance against
     budget.
                                                                                      Carried.



6    QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORPORATION REVIEW OF COUNCIL LIQUIDITY
     Committee Recommendation
     Moved:             Cr Wellington
     Seconded:          Cr Pardon
     That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services to the General Committee
     Meeting dated 13 May 2019 regarding liquidity review outcomes, and authorise the CEO to
     apply to QTC to undertake a $10 million debt repayment by 30 June 2019.
                                                                                     Carried.



Recommendation

The General Committee recommendations dated 13 May 2019 be adopted except where dealt with
or held over by separate resolution.


                                                                                   Page 14 of 22

Section 15

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                                    16 MAY 2019


7                        ORDINARY MEETING REPORTS
Document i nformati on




1                        UPDATE ON PROPOSED FLIGHT PATH CHANGES FOR SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT
Document i nformati on




Author                               Chief Executive Officer, Brett de Chastel
                                     CEO’s Office

Index                                ECM/ Subject/ Aviation/ Noise Issues

Attachments                          1.   Flight Path Forum Statement of Intent

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Nil.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Ordinary Meeting dated 16 May
2019 in relation to the proposed flight path changes for the Sunshine Coast Airport and:
A.                       Note the update from the Chief Executive Officer on actions taken as a result of the Council
                         decision in April 2019 on this issue; and
B.                       Support the Statement of Intent proposed by Flight Path Forum Inc. as set out in Attachment
                         1 to the report and request the Chief Executive Officer to take the necessary action to pursue
                         that outcome including making submissions to Airservices Australia and the Aircraft Noise
                         Ombudsman.

REPORT
Background
At the Ordinary meeting on 18 April 2019, Council considered a report by the CEO on the issue of
the proposed flight paths for the Sunshine Coast Airport.
The purpose of this report to the Council is twofold – firstly to provide the Council with an update on
actions that have been taken as a result of the April 2019 Council decision and secondly, to propose
the next steps in relation to this matter.
1.                       Implementation of the April 2019 Council decision
At the April Ordinary meeting, the Council unanimously passed the following resolution:
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Ordinary Meeting dated 18 April
2019 and request the Chief Executive Officer to make a submission in relation to the proposed
changes to flight paths for the Sunshine Coast Airport with such submission:
A.                       To focus on the establishment of a curfew similar to Gold Coast Airport (enforced by legislation)
                         to minimise the impact of noise from flights on the amenity of residents in order to protect and
                         maintain the Noosa lifestyle and environment;
B.                       To request from Airservices Australia a detailed explanation as to why the intensity of flight
                         numbers over the coastal flight path versus hinterland flight path has changed;
C.                       To request Airservices Australia to extend their community consultation process by 1 month to
                         provide more time for Noosa residents to lodge submissions in relation to the proposal;
D.                       Request Sunshine Coast Regional Council to conduct an independent EIS for Lake Weyba,
                         plus Noosa National Park and the coastal dunes within the Castaways and Marcus Beach
                         area;
E.                       And request Federal Members Llew O’Brien and Ted O’Brien to support Council’s position on
                         this matter.

                                                                                                           Page 15 of 22

Section 16

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                 16 MAY 2019


Since that time, the following actions have been taken:
 The Chief Executive Officer has formally written to the Commonwealth Department of
    Infrastructure, Regional Development and Cities seeking a statutory curfew to apply to the
    Sunshine Cast Airport in the future. This is the Department that has statutory authority for
    airports in Australia. The key issues raised included the need to protect residential amenity, the
    increased impact that flights could have during night time operations and the fact that such
    statutory curfews exist at Sydney, Adelaide, Gold Coast and Melbourne Essendon airport.
 As the matter of a statutory curfew is a Commonwealth Government decision, the Mayor has
    also written to the Federal Members of Parliament for Wide Bay (Llew O’Brien MP) and Fairfax
    (Ted O’Brien MP) in relation to this matter. The Mayor has also written to the relevant Federal
    Minister (Minister Michael McCormack MP) seeking his support on this matter. Both the Mayor
    and CEO have briefed the Member for Wide Bay extensively on this issue and he is providing
    excellent support for the position taken by the Noosa Council and the Noosa community on the
    flight path issue. The Mayor has also discussed this matter with Ted O’Brien MP, Federal
    Member for Fairfax as well as the State Member for Noosa, Sandy Bolton MLA.
 No formal response has yet been received from the Commonwealth in relation to the curfew
    issue but this may be related to the fact that the Commonwealth government is currently in
    “caretaker mode” due to the upcoming federal election.
 The CEO has written to the Sunshine Coast Council requesting them to conduct an independent
    EIS for Lake Weyba, plus Noosa National Park and the coastal dunes within the Castaways and
    Marcus Beach area. No formal response has been received to date and a follow up request is
    underway. Sunshine Coast Council have made press statements that reject the position put by
    Noosa Council.
 The CEO formally requested Airservices Australia to extend the time period for submissions for
    a period of one month (beyond 30 April) on the basis of the poor and well documented problems
    associated with the Airservices Australia consultation process. On Tuesday 30 April, Council
    received correspondence from Airservices Australia advising that they did not intend to extend
    the engagement period. That same day, the CEO again wrote to Airservices Australia seeking
    a review of that decision emphasising the importance of this issue to the Noosa community and
    the need to allow more time for the community to make informed submissions on this important
    issue. Airservices Australia has indicated that it does not intend to extend time further. Further
    consideration on this issue will be considered under the heading of “next steps” below.
 The CEO requested Airservices Australia to provide a detailed explanation as to why the
    intensity of flight numbers over the coastal flight path versus hinterland flight path has changed.
    Airservices Australia has provided their response on 3 May 2019 as follows:
    “With reference to aircraft operations on the approved flight paths from the EIS, Chapter D2
    section 2.9.1.3 describes the Secondary Approach and Departure Corridor as:
    This is a secondary corridor that has been established to provide an efficient second flight path
    for aircraft arriving from, and departing to southern destinations such as Sydney and Melbourne.
    This corridor provides a shorter flight path for arriving aircraft able to carry out some types of
    advanced GPS based instrument approach procedures which can accommodate turns, as well
    as providing a suitable flight path for aircraft making visual approaches.
    Aircraft arriving from the south to Runway 13 will use the secondary corridor to save the extra
    flying distance and time which would otherwise be required if they were to arrive via an outer
    joining route to the primary approach corridor in the north. In some instances ATC will also split
    air traffic between the primary and secondary corridors to avoid traffic conflicts.
    The increased adoption of the advanced GPS technology by airlines, now means that more
    aircraft are able to carry out these types of advanced GPS based instrument approach
    procedures on the efficient second flight path, saving them the extra flying distance and time.”
    No other information has been provided by Airservices Australia at this time in relation to this
    aspect.



                                                                                       Page 16 of 22

Section 17

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                     16 MAY 2019


2.    Next Steps
The issue of the flight paths is an important issue to those parts of the Noosa community that are
potentially affected by the proposed flight paths. In recent weeks, a number of community meetings
have been held and new community organisations established that are focused on this flight path
issue.
Large community meetings have been held at Tinbeerwah and Peregian Beach and these meetings
have been attended by the Mayor and some Councillors. Councillors have also recently met with
representatives from the newly established Noosa Hinterland Residents Association and Council is
also liaising with the newly formed Flight Path Forum which is taking a key role in co-ordinating the
campaign in relation to the proposed flight path issue.
Flight Path Forum is a recently incorporated association which is acting as an umbrella or co-
ordinating group to work with other organisations that are lobbying on this issue. This includes the
following organisations:
     Friends of Lake Weyba
     Peregian Family and Friends Association
     Peregian Beach Residents Association
     Castaways Beach Residents Association
     Noosa Hinterland Residents Association.
Flight Path Forum has also met with Federal Member for Wide Bay, Llew O’Brien MP. He requested
that the group put together a document that clearly articulated what the group is seeking. Attachment
1 to this report contains that “Statement of Intent”.
It is understood that Mr O’Brien has indicated his support for this Statement of Intent. Flight Path
Forum and the Noosa Hinterland Residents Association are now seeking formal support from our
Council for this Statement of Intent.
Our Council should support this Statement of Intent. Although Council has no jurisdiction in relation
to airspace matters, it is important that our Council continues to take an advocacy role that supports
the concerns of our community.
One of the key concerns raised by the Statement of Intent is the poor consultation process. An
alternative process is proposed to offset the failures of the initial consultation. The initial consultation
was undoubtedly very poor. Some examples include:
     Where residents did receive notification of community information sessions, often that
      notification was received after the community information sessions had been held;
     The community information sessions were under-resourced and many residents who attended
      were unable to get information provided. There were also reports from residents that
      inconsistent information was provided at those community information sessions;
     There was inconsistency as to who received information about the proposed flight paths. As
      a practical example, the CEO lives in Noosaville which is well removed from any flight path
      area but received a letter box drop about the issue. The Mayor who lives in Tinbeerwah near
      a proposed flight path did not receive a letterbox drop.
     There appears to be a clear lack of notice given to residents. At the Tinbeerwah Hall public
      meeting called by concerned residents on the flight path issue, only two out of approximately
      250 attendees indicated that they had received a formal advice about the flight path issue.
      Similarly, at a community meeting at the Peregian Beach Community House, only eight out of
      approximately 400 in attendance indicated that they had received a formal advice about the
      flight path issue.
     Flight Path Forum has developed a 60 page document that highlights deficiencies in the
      consultation process.


                                                                                            Page 17 of 22

Section 18

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                  16 MAY 2019


It is understood that Airservices Australia received about 3,300 submissions, many of which
included:
i)    concerns about the consultation process; and
ii)   a request for more time to gather facts and make more informed submissions.

This evidences wide spread community concern.

The Aircraft Noise Ombudsman has a statutory role in independently reviewing the management of
aircraft noise related activities by Airservices Australia including:
i)    the handling of complaints or enquiries made to Airservices Australia about aircraft noise
ii)   community consultation processes related to aircraft noise; and
iii)  the presentation and distribution of aircraft noise-related information.

As such, in pursuing the outcomes sought by the Statement of Intent, the CEO would also be taking
up this issue with the Aircraft Noise Ombudsman.

3.     Discussion
It is important for our Council to support our residents who may be affected by the proposed changes
to flight paths proposed by Airservices Australia.
One of the most effective actions that Council can take at this stage is to continue lobbying on behalf
of our community in relation to the April 2019 Council decision and to provide support to our local
community groups in relation to the Statement of Intent proposed by Flight Path Forum on behalf of
the various community groups.

Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting Minutes, 18 April 2019, Item 1, Page 15
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Ordinary Meeting dated 18 April
2019 and request the Chief Executive Officer to make a submission in relation to the proposed
changes to flight paths for the Sunshine Coast Airport with such submission:
A.     To focus on the establishment of a curfew similar to Gold Coast Airport (enforced by legislation)
       to minimise the impact of noise from flights on the amenity of residents in order to protect and
       maintain the Noosa lifestyle and environment;
B.     To request from Airservices Australia a detailed explanation as to why the intensity of flight
       numbers over the coastal flight path versus hinterland flight path has changed;
C.     To request Airservices Australia to extend their community consultation process by 1 month to
       provide more time for Noosa residents to lodge submissions in relation to the proposal;
D.     Request Sunshine Coast Regional Council to conduct an independent EIS for Lake Weyba,
       plus Noosa National Park and the coastal dunes within the Castaways and Marcus Beach
       area;
E.     And request Federal Members Llew O’Brien and Ted O’Brien to support Council’s position on
       this matter.

Finance
Nil.

Risks & Opportunities
There is an opportunity for Council to support our residents by raising concerns with Airservices
Australia in relation to noise issues that may arise from the proposed flight paths.
The determination of flight paths and whether airports should operate with a curfew is a
Commonwealth matter.

                                                                                        Page 18 of 22

Section 19

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                  16 MAY 2019


Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Airservices Australia staff involved in the current community consultation process
Councillors have received representations from residents regarding this issue
Ross Ullman from Sunshine Coast Regional Council

Internal Consultation
Mayor and Councillors

Departments/Sections Consulted:

 x   Chief Executive Officer      Community Services                       Corporate Services
     Executive Officer            Director                                 Director
     Executive Support            Community Development                    Financial Services
                                  Community Facilities                     ICT
                                  Libraries & Galleries                    Procurement & Fleet
                                  Local Laws                               Property
                                  Waste & Environmental Health             Revenue Services

     Executive Services           Environment & Sustainable Development    Infrastructure Services
     Director                     Director                                 Director
     Community Engagement         Building & Plumbing Services             Asset Management
     Customer Service             Development Assessment                   Buildings and Facilities
     Governance                   Economic Development                     Civil Operations
     People and Culture           Environmental Services                   Disaster Management
                                  Strategic Land Use Planning              Infrastructure Planning,
                                                                           Design and Delivery




                                                                                        Page 19 of 22

Section 20

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA     16 MAY 2019


                          ATTACHMENT 1




                            Page 20 of 22

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                           16 MAY 2019

                                                                                             ATTACHMENT 1

        (=))         FLIGHT PATH FORUM
          =          STATEMENT OF INTENT
           TT a

     Communities and associations represented by Flight Path Forum believe that community consultation regarding the
     proposed flight path changes associated with runway 13/31 of the Sunshine Coast Airport failed to adequately
     educate and inform stakeholders about the relevant technical aspects of the flight paths and their likely impacts.
    Feedback from stakeholders who reside and operate businesses underneath and in close proximity to the proposed
     flight paths indicate that:
     1)  «There was a lack of notification regarding the engagement activities
         a. Residents either received no notification or were notified on or after the 2™ of April 2019 via a flyer delivered
            in an unaddressed envelope.
         b. This date allowed one day's notice to attend one of the remaining five of nine sessions over the following 12
            days with 17 days remaining to make a submission. A total consultation period of 28 days instead of the
            intended 42 days (six weeks).
         c. This date was three working days prior to school holidays when many stakeholders were not in the area. The
            remaining period included 3 public holidays when Sunshine Coast Council (SCC) and Airservices Australia
            (ASA) could not be reached for further information.

     2) Information was conflicting and confusing
         a. Information presented online, on display boards, in fact sheets and verbally was often conflicting.
         b. Representatives from SCC and ASA could not answer all questions as they were either not the subject matter
            expert or unsure of who was responsible for the information or decision.
         c. Additional information was provided over time in the form of display boards and fact sheets, which resulted
            in stakeholders attending the earlier sessions not receiving the same quantity of information as attendees
            who attended the later sessions.
    We proposed the formation of a Stakeholder Engagement Panel to include representatives from the aforementioned
     organisations, community groups and residents’ associations, and businesses accessing existing facilities who will be
     affected by flight path proposals, airspace design and operation of the new runway.
         © = Airservices Australia                             ©   Federal Member for Fairfax
         © = Aircraft Noise ombudsman                          e   Federal Member for Wide Bay
         ®  Sunshine Coast Council                             ©   Coordinator General
         e  Sunshine Coast Airport Management                  e   SCA Aviation operators
         e  Sunshine Coast Airport Expansion Project           ©   ~=Flight Path Forum members
            Management                                         e   Anagreed independent chairperson to be
         ®  Noosa Council                                          determined by all stakeholders
    The objectives of the new Stakeholder engagement Panel will include, but not be limited to:
     1.‘ Establishing alternative agreed flight paths
     2.  Utilise an independent chairperson to ensure community consultation is based on transparency and full disclosure, is
         effective, relevant and representative of stakeholders values and concems.
     3.  Ensure environmental, social and noise impact studies are undertaken on areas that will be affected by agreed flight

                                                                                                 Page 20 of 22

Section 21

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA   16 MAY 2019




                          Page 21 of 22

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                             16 MAY 2019

       The benefits of a forming a Stakeholder Engagement Pane! is that it will mitigate conflict, reduce regulatory time frames,
       display a positive public image, improve community relations, establish credibility and improve public reputations.

       Flight Path Forum Inc. has formed to represent northern communities across both Noosa and Sunshine Coast council
       areas, who are affected by proposed flights paths for runway 13/31 of the Sunshine Coast Airport. Community Groups
       working collaboratively with Flight Path Forum include:
       © =©Friends of Lake Weyba
       e  Peregian Family and Friends Association
       e  Peregian Beach Residents Association
       ®  Castaways Beach Residents Association
       ®  Noosa Hinterland Residents Association

                                                                                                   Page 21 of 22

Section 22

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                             16 MAY 2019


8    CLOSED SESSION




9    NEXT MEETING

     The next Ordinary Meeting will be held on 20 June 2019 at Council Chambers,
     9 Pelican Street, Tewantin commencing at 6pm.




10   MEETING CLOSURE




                                                                    Page 22 of 22

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.