Council archive · source document
Appendix C Soils report · MCU19/0119
HUNTER HOPKINS PROJECT 5 ATF
C/-HUNTER HOPKINS PROJECT 5 TRUST
PO BOX 523
BENTLEIGH EAST VIC 3165
SITE INVESTIGATION
FOR PROPOSED
NEW DOMESTIC CONSTRUCTION
AT
LOT 1 (2-4) NOLA STREET, NOOSAVILLE
SITE CLASSIFICATION
P: DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF UNCONTROLLED FILL MATERIAL
With a Site Reactivity of
S: SLIGHTLY REACTIVE
Ys = 0 - 20mm
Note: Due to the presence of a water table, difficulty would be expected in boring deep piers. If deep piers are required
for pool, services, etc. it is anticipated that screw piers would be required.
David H Hardy
RPEQ 6725
for and on behalf of
Qld Soil Testing Pty Ltd
14/121 Newmarket Road Tel: (07) 3857 0202 Email: [email protected]
Windsor, QLD 4030 Fax: (07) 3357 5572 Web: www.qstgroup.com.au JOB No: 1991/19
QST Group ABN 68 620 644 751 Qld Soil Testing ABN 13 104 315 657 24 September, 2019
QST Group Pty Ltd is an Agent of Qld Soil Testing Pty Ltd
- R1 -
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
SOIL TEST
SITE INVESTIGATION
As requested, a geotechnical site investigation was carried out for the site indicated on Page 1 of this report.
The site investigation comprised of drilling a number of holes to determine the soil profile. The required number of holes was determined on
site by the drilling technician based on the conditions observed on site and the requirements of AS2870 Clause 2.3.4. A minimum of one
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test was performed unless it was deemed not necessary. Representative clay samples were taken as
deemed appropriate and tested in the laboratory. The general site conditions were also noted.
The report is based on site conditions encountered at the time of our investigation. If the condition of the site varies considerably after our site
investigation, eg major earth works, then the site classification may need to be amended.
SITE CLASSIFICATION
The results of the site investigation and laboratory testing enable the site to be classified in accordance with AS2870 based on the estimated
characteristic surface movement (ys). The various site classes are outlined in the CSIRO Building Technology File 18 “Foundation Maintenance
and Footing Performance: A Homeowner’s Guide”. The classification of the subject site is indicated on Page R1.
WIND CLASSIFICATION
Where requested, a visual investigation and desktop study of the site has been carried out in accordance with AS4055-2012. The results of this
classification are presented along with the borehole information.
FOUNDING MATERIAL
The minimum founding material is indicated on the Borelog Profile on Drawing No.1 and is based on our findings as well as any information
provided to us. The nominated material is dependent on all requirements set out in this report being complied with. Where a Footing System
Design is to be carried out at a later date, it is possible the required founding material may differ based on information provided at that time. If
conditions encountered on site differ from the information set out herein, this office is to be contacted immediately for further advice. Where
a third party utilises this report for any purpose, including carrying out a Footing System Design, it is their responsibility to ensure the
nominated founding material is suitable for the intended use.
TREES
Unless otherwise noted, the Site Classification in this report has been based on the assumption that all trees on site that could affect the
performance of the footings will be removed. Trees that could affect the performance of the footings are those which are a distance from the
house of:
0.75 x ”h” “M” sites
1.0 x “h” “H” sites
1.5 x “h” “E” sites
Where “h” is the mature height of the tree. Where rows or groups of trees are involved, the distance from the house should be increased.
As the trees are removed, the hole left by the root ball is to be filled with water and the surrounding area saturated.
The classification may vary if trees are to be left on site.
CONTROLLED FILL MATERIAL
Where Qld Soil Testing has been provided with a compaction certificate, this certificate has been relied upon in determining the suitability of
the fill material on this site as the founding material for the proposed residence. Qld Soil Testing accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracies
in the supplied compaction certificate.
LIMITS OF REPORT
The findings in the report are based on information obtained from the field site investigation. It should be noted that the soil conditions could
vary considerably over short distances. Where soil conditions are encountered during excavation that varies from the site investigation findings
then the engineer should be immediately contacted.
Unless otherwise noted this investigation and report does not address the following issues:
Mining Subsidence (In areas in the vicinity of underground mines a specialist consultant is required to be engaged for a Mining
Subsidence Study.)
Slope/Stability Analysis. On steep sites and in areas prone to slippage the local authority should be consulted. A specialist report may
be required.
Contamination and/or hazardous materials on site.
Underground services. It is the client’s responsibility to inform us of the existence of, or the future construction of, underground
services in the vicinity of the house.
Contours, slope, site proportion/dimensions. Any slopes or dimensions shown are indicative only and should not be relied upon by
others.
Location of springs or underground water. Where water tables are noted the depth to the water table may vary significantly over
short periods of time. Significant variation of subsurface flow may occur between periods of wet and dry weather.
Deep soft/unstable soils. Investigations are normally limited to a depth of 1.5 metres. Therefore deep underlying problems will not
be detected by a limited investigation such as this. A search of council records should be undertaken by either the owner or the
builder prior to construction to discover such information.
Acid Sulphate Soils. Chemical Testing for the presence of Acid Sulphate Soils does not form part of this report. Where the presence of
acid sulphate soils is possible, eg. reclaimed marine environments, advice should be sought from the Local Authority and/or an
expert in the field.
Flood Hazard Areas. It is the client’s responsibility to inform us if the site is located within a Flood Hazard Area as defined by the Qld
Development Code MP 3.5. Where information relating to a Flood Hazard Area has not been provided then no consideration has
been given to this matter.
- R2 - VERSION 4.3
Page 3
SITE INVESTIGATION RESULT 27/09/19
GROUP 1991/19 1
Soil Testing Engineering Surveying Contract Drilling
Page 4
SITE INVESTIGATION RESULT 24/09/19
GROUP 1991/19 1
Soil Testing Engineering Surveying Contract Drilling
Used in these records
Appendix C Soils report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.6 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.