Council archive · source document
Representations · MCU13/0064
10 December 2013 Our Ref: 10974 / Office: Sunshine Coast Council Ref: MCU13/0064 SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL LOCKED BAG 72 SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE NAMBOUR QLD 4560 ATTENTION: Mr Jack Lewis Dear Jack REPRESENTATIONS ON DECISION NOTICE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE MAKEPEACE ISLAND, NOOSA NORTH SHORE LOT 55 MCH1667 Further to Council’s Decision Notice issued for the above development application, we make the following representations in regards to Council’s approval: Condition 4 The last sentence of condition 4 requires “No additional persons and/or guests are permitted on the island at any time…”. This requirement is overly restrictive and contrary to section 345 of the Sustainable Planning Act which requires conditions must be relevant or reasonable. This restriction removes the right of guests staying at the Island to have their own guests (friends/family etc), who may live or also be staying in the area, visit them on the Island. While this may not be a regular occurrence, it is nonetheless a reasonable expectation and right of a guest at any resort. This ancillary activity does not change the approved use and will have no detrimental impact on the amenity of the site or surrounding area. The condition is not relevant to and is clearly unreasonable in respect of the development. Accordingly, we request that Condition 4 be amended to delete the last sentence. Condition 15 Condition 15 requires that noise from amplified music and entertainment must not be audible any any affected premises between the hours of 10pm and 7am. This condition is overly restrictive and contrary to section 345 of the Sustainable Planning Act which requires conditions must be relevant or reasonable. The restriction is not required under any Council noise policy, The Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy or the Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation noise level criteria. The restriction will unreasonably impact on the operation of the resort and the guests enjoyment of their stay by not allowing ‘reasonable’ level music to be played after 10pm. It would be extremely unusual for an exclusive resort to all of a sudden at 10pm turn off the music, which is the potential impact of the condition.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
While needing an ability for ‘reasonable’ levels of level music to be played after 10pm, the resort operation will need to ensure noise from music and entertainment does not impact the amenity of guest bedrooms on the island, which will be much closer to the noise source than residences off site. In considering this condition it is particularly relevant to have regard to the fact that NO properly made submissions were made in respect of the application. If noise was an issue there would have been community objection, particularly from nearby residents to the proposal. While it is acknowledged that noise was raised as a concern in the not properly made submission of 18 July 2013, this submission and the issues raised are out of context with the proposed use and was made following use of the site as a one off event hosting the X Factor. At the beginning of July 2013 Makepeace hosted X-factor on the island for 5 days. This was at the request of Tourism Qld and Sunshine Coast Destinations Ltd. The island was used at this time for filming for the TV show. The 130 film crew members and contestants had to get to and from the island daily and there was a huge amount of filming equipment involved in the production. Consequently during this period the barge was used quite a lot. They had a significant amount of flood lighting to facilitate filming in the evening. Being a singing show there was amplified music involved. This one off event and the associated complaint has no relation to the current application or proposed use. The restriction also has no regard to the current sites use rights which have no noise restriction and the fact that no compliant other than the not properly made submission have been made about the use. The proposed use will result in a more controlled approach to music and entertainment and decrease in potential noise levels given that the Island will be occupied by unrelated people as opposed to a related group. Accordingly, we request that Condition 15 be amended to: “Noise from amplified music and entertainment LOCT10, in a full octave band with centre frequencies from 63 Hz to 2000 Hz must not exceed the background level, LOCT90, by more than 3 dB in any octave band when measured internally at any affected premises between the hours of 10pm and 7am”. The applicant would accept this varied noise level control until 12 midnight with no audible level between 12 midnight and 7 am. Condition 16 The trigger for condition 16, being a single compliant, is particularly onerous and contrary to section 345 of the Sustainable Planning Act which requires conditions must be relevant or reasonable. While the condition suggests the compliant must be ‘other than a frivolous or vexatious complaint’ there is nothing to qualify how this is determined and therefore the condition is too open ended and uncertain. While it may become clear after several complaints from the same person (and no one else that may be similarly affected) that the compliant is vexatious, it may be too late to have avoided unnecessary enforcement actions of the condition. Accordingly, we request that Condition 16 be amended such that the condition trigger is more than a single complaint. Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct. Yours faithfully KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Scott Sobey DIRECTOR
Used in these records
RepresentationsRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 217 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.