22-040 Final Decision (1)

24.   The Tribunal noted that the Noosa Shire Council had no objection to the proposed
      carport at the proposed location provided it meets the following conditions (Noosa
      Shire Council ‘Referral Agency Response’ dated 9 May 2022 recommended
      ‘approval’ of the proposed building works ‘subject to conditions’):




25.   The Tribunal noted that all of the properties within the eastern extent of the cul-de-
      sac within the streetscape on both sides of the street, visible to the subject property,
      all had solid timber or masonry walls and gates at, or exceeding, 1.8 metres high.

26.   The Tribunal noted that the significant majority of properties in this streetscape had
      garages or carports with roller or tilt doors, or were located behind solid gates at
      least 1.8 metre high (with the one exception of 17 Wesley Ct. which has a garage
      with a vertically screen tilt door built up to the front property boundary).

27.   In terms of PO6(a) the Tribunal formed the opinion that the high level of amenity and
      visual and acoustic privacy being sought in this part of Wesley Ct. was by high
      masonry walls, solid fences, high solid screen gates and garage and carport doors.

28.   In terms of PO6(f) the Tribunal formed the view that the prevailing streetscape in this
      part of Wesley Ct. was characterised by high masonry walls, solid fences, high solid
      screen gates and garage and carports with predominantly solid doors.




                                          -6-