Original source · versioned page text
2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 JANUARY 2018
Reasons Compliance Not Achieved Action Required to Achieve Compliance
1. The Decision Notice requires lodgement of an Lodge an application for a Development Permit for
Operational Works application for Operational Works for stage 1 with appropriate
subdivisional works for each stage. documentation and management plans as required
by conditions of the Development Permit to
Reconfigure a Lot (152006.1999).
2. Amended plans have not been submitted Submit amended plans prior to the issue of the first
pursuant to the Decision Notice. Development Permit for Operational Works.
3. The Performance Bond required by Condition Submit the Performance Bond of $60,000 to
17 of the Development Permit to Reconfigure Council.
a Lot (152006.1999) has not been lodged with
Council.
4. Works required to be completed for stage 1 as Complete the required works for stage 1 in
set out in the Development Permit to accordance with a Development Permit for
Reconfigure a Lot (152006.1999) have not Operational Works and the Development Permit to
commenced or been completed. Reconfigure a Lot (152006.1999).
5. The Infrastructure Charges for the approved Pay the Infrastructure Charges for stage 1 of the
development have not been paid pursuant to development of $163,398 (at cpi March 2017)
the Infrastructure Charges Notice 449.
6. Council’s rates are outstanding for the Pay the outstanding rates for the property.
property as of 13 July 2017.
In accordance with SPA, the Action Notice must also state a time period in which the applicant
may again make an application to Council to avoid lapsing of the compliance assessment
application. The initial Action Notice issued gave the applicant 3 months, ending on 21 October
2017.
The applicant subsequently made representations to this Action Notice advising that Council’s
rates had been paid and seeking an extension to the period within which to complete the
outstanding items to 5 July 2019.
Council officers responded to the request and advised the applicant that “…Council does not
agree to your request to extend the period within which to complete these outstanding items to 5
July 2019 as:
1. Condition 1 of the Court Order dated 5 July 2013 approving the development requires that
all works relevant to the particular stage be completed prior to the submission of the
subdivision plan for the particular stage.
2. The requested extension seeks an extension beyond the relevant period identified in the
Court Order.
3. Council has refused to extend the relevant period of the Court Order.
The Council notifies 1 December 2017 as the date by which a further request for compliance
assessment may be made failing which the request for compliance assessment lapses”.
The applicant has subsequently lodged an appeal against this response seeking that Council’s
Action Notice be changed to allow until 5 July 2019 to complete the outstanding the actions. The
applicant submits that the period set by Council for taking the actions is not reasonable.
It is in order for Council to defend the appeal and the recommendation is worded accordingly.
Page 103 of 135
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.