2018-01-15 General Committee Agenda

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                               15 JANUARY 2018


     o     Block 20 – the overall height of this building has marginally increased as a
           consequence of associated proposed civil works, wherein the upper level of the
           building has been shifted to align with the level of adjacent driveway to facilitate
           convenient and pedestrian access to the dwellings;
   Minor amendments to the staging of the development to generally align with anticipated
     construction and titling program of delivery. Notwithstanding the proposed staging
     amendments, these have been notated for identification purposes only. The order of
     construction of individual stages has not been confirmed. Our client is seeking to retain
     flexibility in the approval conditions to allow stages to proceed individually, simultaneously
     or not in sequential order.
The proposed new dwelling configuration for individual stages can be summarised as follows:-




The proposed changes will require consequential changes to conditions to reflect the amended
site layout, proposed staging amendments and updated building number references. Accordingly,
it is requested to amend conditions 1, 2, 8, 33, 64 and Advisory Notes 1, 2 and 11
The application also proposes to amend Conditions 4, 47, 83 and 96.
The application also identifies formatting issues with existing conditions 72 and 81 and it is
requested that these be rectified as part of this application. Based on feedback from Council’s
Environmental Health Department it is also recommended to remove reference to a Local Law
which is no longer applicable within Condition 81.
Summarised versions of the current approved and proposed development plans are included as
Attachments 1 & 2. A comparison of the layout from the original, subsequent approved changes
to the development and the current proposal are shown in Figures 1 – 5 below.
The application is before Council due to the scale and significance of the development. However,
the proposed amendments are generally considered relatively minor and do not result in
significant change to the overall form of the development.




                                                                                  Page 22 of 135