Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Rochelle Gooch - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: [email protected]
Sent: 25 Apr 2017 22:47:25 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Emailing: Rochelle's Submission Scanlon Development
Attachments: Rochelle's Submission Scanlon Development.docx
Importance: Normal
Attention: Mr Patrick Murphy
Assessment Officer
Noosa Council
25.4.2017
Dear Mr Murphy,
Please find the attached Submission, my Objection to The Scanlon Group Proposal for
Lot 77 Peregian Beach.
Kind Regards
Rochelle Gooch
1/22 Shearwater St
Peregian Beach
Document Set ID: 20307954
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Patrick Murphy
The Assessment Officer
Noosa Shire Council
[email protected]
Dear Mr Murphy,
MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041
215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH
Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accomodation
Submission re The Scanlon Group Development Proposal
1) This Material Change of Use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy Peregian’s
point of difference & the attraction of our village for residents, holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan
Park amenity, that was the real ‘essence’ of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce
landscaping to soften the architectural bulk & concrete structures.
2) Non Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with the majority of the accommodation proposed
for Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor
accommodation for the needs of this community, nor the wider Noosa Shire. Peregian Beach has already
been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open
space & village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation for campers & RVs would be an acceptable community
solution, celebrating the open space & providing a beach holiday experience for all.
3) Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St
Renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community
consultation process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased
useage. The leafy ambience planned for both Rufous laneway & Pocket Park to encourage parking &
pedestrian access to the village would be greatly compromised by proximity of 2m setbacks & 7m height of
the proposed Reed & Wallum buildings, on top of whatever level of fill is added to natural ground level.
4 ) The Development’s significant impact on the Creeks & Wetland, both during construction & upon
completion is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of & beside this
ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park – Emu Swamp Section.
The natural spring, recognised in the 1960s & probably for thousands of years by our indigenous forebears,
known locally as Little Rufous Creek joins a second watercourse that feeds the wetland & contributes
immensely to its ecology. This DA positions Lots 10,11 & 12 totally within expanded watercourse, as well
as the gabion wall, roadway, landscaping & retention ponds. Parts of Lots 12 & 6, the Community Pool
Pavilion & Hotel/Motel also appear to be within the footprint of the watercourse. Significant disturbance
to the ecology & hydrology of this site & associated impacts on the adjoining Council Reserve & Noosa
National Park –Emu Swamp Section, is unacceptable & needs to be examined.
Document Set ID: 20307954
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 3
To address the DA’s plans, approximately 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise
to 150 trips per day for at least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along
David Low Way, down Sandpiper Court, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St
roundabout. The impacts of such large amounts of fill, will create fragmentation of the watercourse, its
habitat values & biodiversity - an environmental injustice for Qld Govt’s identified Mandatory Essential
Habitat. Much of the western half of the site, including Little Rufous Creek, adjacent watercourse & the
associated remnant vegetation have been mapped by the State as Matters of State Environmental
Significance (MSES).
There is no reference in the DA of the planned disturbance to essential wetland habitat for the vulnerable
Wallum Froglet( Crinia tinnula), Wallum Rocketfrog (Litoria freycinet), Wallum Sedgefrog (Litoria
oblongburensis), nor the impact on wetland heathland & sedgeplain, inhabited by the vulnerable Ground
Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) recorded less than 500ms from the site.
I’m seriously concerned that this proposal will cause significantly adverse environmental impacts on
wildlife habitat, regulated vegetation, high ecological significance wetlands & protected area, as it fails to
recognize or provide protection for these mandated areas nor adequately mitigate the impacts of the
planned development upon them.
Document Set ID: 20307954
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 4
5) Significant & continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, laneway,
PB Hotel, Hardware store, business & private premises in the vicinity of the roadways & roundabout is
guaranteed. The impact will be to the detriment of acoustic & visual qualities, lifestyle, holiday village
ambience & business, especially al fresco dining/coffee shops that all enjoy fresh air & sounds of nature.
6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further
during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional
congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future.
7) Foreground Vistas of the wetland & its vegetation across Noosa National Park-Emu Swamp Section to Mt
Cooroy will be diminished, in fact lost, to the bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected heights. Council
needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views highly valued by
community & visitors alike, are maintained . Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of
Noosa’s logo ‘Different by Nature’ by altering design or lowering the amount of fill to protect the
invaluable amenity of open space & ‘community vistas’.
8) Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public
access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance, particularly at
night. Light pollution is a further issue as every new light bulb impacts adversely on Peregian’s
disappearing night sky, particularly of concern with the density planned for this site.
9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan
for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north western corner’s existing
vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors &
local community with potential to make genuine connections between Rufous St /Laneway with this
development. Instead, it separates itself from the village feel, in fact opposes the local residential
community & village activities associated with the function & interaction of Kindergarten, Veggie Village,
Tennis Club & Community House, all nearby neighbours & impacted by the planned development.
This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose to visit this
relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable
urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with PB’s much sought after open space linkages,
relaxed village character & community engagement.
I urge Noosa Council to protect & retain the village of Peregian Beach, to stand strong behind the intent of
the Noosa Town Plan & refuse this Development Application.
Rochelle Gooch
1/22 Shearwater St [email protected]
Peregian Beach 4573 21st April 2017
Document Set ID: 20307954
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Rochelle Gooch - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Rochelle Gooch - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 526 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.