Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - Geotechnical Report
PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT
216 BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD, BLACK MOUNTAIN
6.1.2 Qualitative Stability Assessment
The risk assessment for this project has been carried out following AGS 2007 Practice Note Guidelines for
Landslide Risk Management. Relative levels of risk and their implications are given in Table 2 below, and
the Qualitative Terminology for Use in Assessing Risk to Property is attached in Appendix C.
Table 2: Stability Risk Levels
Risk Level Example Implications(1)
Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research, planning
Very High
VH and implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to Low; may be too
Risk
expensive and not practical. Work likely to cost more than value of property.
Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and implementation of
H High Risk treatment options required to reduce risk to Low. Work would cost a substantial sum in
relation to the value of the property.
May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulators’ approval) but requires
Moderate
M investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to reduce risk to Low.
Risk
Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be implemented as soon as practicable.
Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to reduce the risk
L Low Risk
to this level, ongoing maintenance required.
Very Low
VL Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
Risk
Note: (1) The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may
depend on the nature of the property at risk; these are only given as a general guide.
Considering the existing site conditions, and subject to the implementation of recommendations given below,
it is our opinion that there is a Low (L) Risk of global slope instability affecting the proposed subdivision.
Regulators (NC) normally require that a Very Low or Low Risk of landslide affecting property must be
demonstrated to enable development approval. Summarised in Table 3 below is our qualitative assessment
of landslide risk for the site. A summary of qualitative terminology for use in assessing risk to property is
attached (taken from AGS 2007) in Appendix C.
Table 3: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence
Risk
Comments
The likelihood of a relatively shallow failure through
the stiff (or stiffer) residual soils is assessed as Rare
due to the gentle to moderate ground slopes (in the
1: Shallow landslide in stiff (or
vicinity of the proposed building envelope), strength
stiffer) residual/extremely
Rare Medium Low of these materials, apparent lack of groundwater,
weathered soil materials above
and anticipated scope of future earthworks for
the foundation depth
residential construction. A potential Medium impact
from such instability is assessed, with the resultant
risk to be Low as per AGS 2007.
The likelihood of a deep failure through the very low
strength (or stronger) phyllite is assessed as Barely
Credible due to the lack of evidence of such
2: Deep seated landslide
Barely instability on the site, and through the surrounding
through the weathered phyllite Major Very Low
Credible area, combined with the strength of the material
rock below the foundation depth
encountered. A potential Major impact from such
instability is assessed, with the resultant risk to be
Very Low as per AGS 2007.
19 June 2018
Report No. 17427-001-Rev0 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.