Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-16 GC Agenda - Item 3, Attach 1 - Annual Report 2014-15
The original of this document is very large (15.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
QAO
certified statements
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
Notes to the financial statements
For the year ended 30 June 2015
14 Fair value measurements continued
Level 2 Level 3
(significant (significant
other unobservable
Total
observable inputs)
As at 30 June 2014 inputs) ,-,
Property, plant and equipment
- Land 65.314.000 55.631.066 120,945.066
- Buildings 59,359,897 59.359.897
- Road and Bridge Networ1< 525,690.984 525.690,984
- Storm Water 104.337.298 104,337.298
- Other Infrastructure Assets 54,356.557 54.356,557
65.314.000 799,375.802
There were no transfers between level 2 and 3 during the financial year.
Council's policy is to recognise transfers in and out of the fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the
reporting period.
(i1) Valuation techniques used to value Council assets comprise:
Land (level 2 and 3)
Land fair values were determined by independent valuer, AssetVal Pty Ltd effective 1 January 2014.
Fair values have been derived based on a combination of market approach and direct comparison
by analysing land sales occurring over (he past year within the Noosa Shire Council area,
Where there was an active and liquid market as evidenced by sales transactions of similar property types,
a market approach by way of direct comparison or income methods can be utilised, and are accepted
valuation methodologies under AASB 13. If a market approach is adopted, the valuation is deemed to be
a Level 2 input.
The direct comparison method which is considered a Level 2 input on the fair value hierarchy, involves the
analysis of sales evidence and comparisons with the subject land taking into account matters such as
area, location and other general site characteristics. Direct Comparison approach was utilised in the
assessment for all Council land assets, however, the fair value measurement has been either a Level 2
or 3, depending on the assumptions as to:
Whether the land is subject to restrictions as to use and/or sale:
Whether there is no active market.
If the above assumptions applied to the land as per Queensland Treasury NCAP 3, fair value has been
assessed as a Level 3. However if an active market was established and there are no unreasonable
restrictions as to use and/or sale, measurement was deemed to be a Level 2.
Land that is utilised for footpath or access restriction purposes, land that is a volumetric title, or due to
its general characteristics land that has no observable active market have been assessed as a Level 3.
Buildings (level 3)
For the majority of Council's buildings, there is no active market due to the specialised nature of the assets
and the services they provide. The fair value of buildings were independently valued by registered valuers
Australia Pacific Valuers, effeclive 30 June 2015.
Page 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.