Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Cath Noack MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: Cath and John Noack
Sent: 24 Apr 2017 14:39:03 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Scanlon development, Peregian Beach
Mr Patrick Murphy,
The Assessment Officer,
Noosa Shire Council
[email protected]
Dear Mr Murphy,
Objection to the Scanlon Group Development
Application
215-219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
MCU 16/0153 & REC16/0041
I object to the proposed Development Application on the
following grounds:
Points of Concern for Submission Writing – Scanlon
Development Proposal
1)Material Change of use Application contravenes the
Noosa Town Plan & will destroy our point of difference
& the attraction of our village to holiday makers &
shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity that was the real
essence of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban
density with scarce landscaping.
2)No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with
majority of the accommodation proposed for Permanent
Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this
Document Set ID: 20307603
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
proposal hardly provides low cost visitor accommodation
for the growing needs of the local community. Peregian
Beach is already surrounded by new small lot housing
developments that lack public amenity, open space &
village lifestyle.
3)Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in
particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous
St renewal which is currently in progress, community
amenity values & the extensive community consultation
process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway
upgrade & encourage increased useage.
4)The Development’s impact on the creek & wetland,
both during construction & upon completion is of great
concern, as is the planned density of housing in this
ecologically sensitive reserve & adjacent National Park.
Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be
required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at least 3
months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-
4 minutes along David Low way, down Sandpiper Lane,
through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron
St roundabout.
5) Significant continuous Noise & Disruption to homes
along David Low Way, adjoining streets, PB Hotel,
Hardware store, business & private premises in the
vicinity of the roadways & roundabout guaranteed.
6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is
assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout,
particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further
Document Set ID: 20307603
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 3
during school & public holidays. The proposed
development risks being a serious source of additional
congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on
impossible to mitigate in the future.
7)Diminished vistas across the National Park to Mt
Cooroy due to bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected
heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are
accurate & the current expansive views are maintained.
Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of
Noosa’s logo ‘Different by nature!’
8)Other concerns include density of buildings &
infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to
sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public access
pathway between two story buildings, with little to
recommend passive surveillance or a non threatening
environment, particularly at night.
9) So many missed opportunities to work with
community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master
Plan for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the
amenity. The north western corner’s existing vegetation
could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to
embellish the precinct for visitors & local community
with potential to make connections between Rufous St
/laneway with this development instead it separates itself
from the village feel.
10)This proposal conflicts with community values,
endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this
relaxed pedestrian location. It delivers instead,
Document Set ID: 20307603
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 4
undesirable urban density & city lifestyle that’s
aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after
relaxed village character & community engagement.
I urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian
Beach & to refuse this DA.
Cath Noack 23 Cormorant Crescent, Peregian Beach 4573
Sent from my iPad
Document Set ID: 20307603
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Cath Noack MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Cath Noack MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 85 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.