Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

23688 DA - Change to development approval [As Published] · 132004.240015.4

of 8

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

® Page 2

 

column 1
Specific Outcomes

column 2
Probable solutions

Proposal

 

 

Coastal Protection Precinct and
Erosion Prone

Areas—Eastern Beaches Locality
017 The siting and design of
development and materials used
within the Coastal Protection
Precinct, as identified on the Natural
Resources Overlay Maps, do not
cause any significant adverse
impacts on the coastal resources of
the location nor interrupt the natural
cycles of erosion and accretion of
foreshore areas and beaches.

 

$17.2 Cantilevered decks that are
uncovered and unenciosed located
seaward of the coastal building
line—

a) do not extend seaward of the
average of the outermost seaward
projection of buildings on directly
adjoining properties; and

b) are a maximum depth of 3m;

¢) are setback a minimum of 6m
from the seaward boundary of the
Site;

‘

 

a) The proposed 2.6 metre deck is
generally consistent with the average
seaward projection of the buildings on
adjoining lots. Whilst it is noted that
the adjoining lot to the south is vacant,
the applicant notes this lot is able to
have a deck of at least 3.0 metres due
to the approved cantilever of adjoining
properties. The premises directly to
the north of the site does not have an
cantilevered deck however again
would be able to have a deck of at
least 3.0 metres due to the premises
further to the north. As such the 2.6
metre setback requirement severely
disadvantages the subject site as it
effectively means that it is setback
further than the adjoining properties.
This appears to be contrary to the
intent of the probable solutions which
indicates that cantilevered decks are to
be consistent with projections on
adjoining properties.

b) The proposed 2.6 metre deck is less
than the maximum of 3 metres.

¢) the deck is setback at least 12
metres from the rear seaward
boundary.

 

 

Please find attached:

« Fom2

* Application fees of $745.00

‘
Please contact our office if you require any further information and/or clarification with respect to the above

application,

Yours sincerely

Senior Planner

Martoo Consulting Pty. Ltd.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
366 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

23688 DA - Change to development approval [As Published].pdf · 366 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.