Further Advice Assessment Manager MCU19 0008.02 · MCU19/0008.02

Officer: 	Georgina Schramm
Direct Telephone: 	07 53296569
Our Reference:	MCU19/0008.02
Your Reference:	0357
3 February 2023
KS Ince & JM Ince
C/- Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
4/59 Mary Street
NOOSAVILLE   QLD  4566
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam
Further Advice – Development Application
I refer to your application and advise that Council wishes to provide you with further advice about the application in accordance with the provisions of the Development Assessment Rules 2017.
application details
Application No.	MCU19/0008.02
Street Address:	22 Arakoon Cres Sunshine Beach Qld 4567
Real Property Description:	Lot 793 RP 48111
Planning Scheme:	Noosa Plan 2020 (25 September 2020)
further advice
You are advised that, the following information and amendments are requested:
Issue – Seaward setback
The proposal includes two covered patios on the upper level, with ‘Patio 2’ having the potential to be enclosed i.e., sliding batten.
The ‘awning’ shown on the Roof Plan is not acceptable as it protrudes beyond the building line and covers the deck/patio areas below.
The proposed dwelling does not comply with Performance outcome PO3 (a) of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay.
Information Required
Revise plans to remove screens around ‘Patio 2’ and roof over Patio 1 & 2, and retaining walls where located within 15 metre rear setback.
Reduce the extent of the upper-level awning to be within the 15 metre setback.
Item – Built to Boundary Setbacks
The full length of the road frontage has structures built to both front and side boundaries. It does not comply with AO 9.1 & 9.3 of the Low Density Residential zone code.  No setback to the side boundaries eliminates the opportunity to allow for landscaping between the adjoining premises. An increased side boundary setback allows some vista through to the foreshore and minimises the impact of the zero setback to the front boundary.
Information Required
Submit amended plans that comply with PO9 of the Low Density Residential zone code. Provide an increased side boundary setback allowing for a landscaped setback visible from the street to the rear of the site, allowing for a continuation of a vegetated landscape and skyline.
Submit amended plans that comply with AO9.4 of the Zone Code (a) (ii) and the Queensland Development Code (QDC) A2 (d) (i).
Item - Garaging renders/vs elevations and the PO
The renders of the front elevation indicate that the proposed carport is to be screened whereas, the elevation plans indicate the carport is to be open.
Information Required
Confirm whether the carport is intended to be enclosed and to what extent i.e., is it a carport or garage.
Provide assessment against AO & PO 13 of the Zone Code.
Item – Building presentation
For greater clarity, plans are to be provided showing both the finished and natural ground levels. This will assist in understanding the appearance of the building in its entirety.
There is concern that the southern elevation has an appearance of bulk regarding the brick component of the upper level and height of the wall associated with the carport built to boundary.
Information Required
Show both natural and finished ground levels relative to ground level on elevation and section plans.
Provide revised plans in respect of the southern elevation to minimise the appearance of bulk to adjacent property. Note: Where within the coastal overlay - External building materials are to be lightweight and comprise predominantly timber or board, stainless steel, glass, and corrugated iron will generally be more in keeping with the beach/riverside character than concrete rendered block.
Incorporate additional design elements to the front façade of the building as per AO12.1 of the Zone Code.
Item – Site Cover Calculations
Council’s site cover calculations vary to the calculations provided.
Information Required
Please provide calculations to corroborate as per the Low Density Residential Zone Code is to be measured per storey.
Item – Use of On-Site Infiltration
The subject site is encumbered by Council’s Landslide Overlay and the applicant proposes to use on-site infiltration. Pacific Geotech’s Geotechnical Stability Assessment (PG-2096) does not indicate if on-site infiltration is suitable within the subject site.
Information Required
Provide an amended geotechnical report that certifies that the use of on-site infiltration is suitable given the high landslide risk. The amended report must be endorsed by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland).
Item – Earthworks
The submitted documentation includes significant amounts of earthworks across the site. An Earthworks Plan has not been provided.
Information Required
Provide an Earthworks Plan demonstrating the extent of the proposed earthworks required to carry out the proposed works. The additional plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
the extent and volume of cut and fill;
construction methodology; and
adhere to the recommendations made in Pacific Geotech’s Geotechnical Stability Assessment (PG-2096).
due date for response to further advice
A response to the further advice is required by 3 May 2023. Email your response to [email protected] details
Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me on the number above.
Yours faithfully,

Georgina Schramm
Development Planner

[word/footer1.xml]
Page 2 of 2

[word/footer2.xml]
PO Box 141		P. (07) 5329 6500	[email protected]	
	TEWANTIN  QLD  4565	F. (07) 5329 6501	www.noosa.qld.gov.au
				Page 1 of 2

[word/header1.xml]
3