Original source · versioned page text
2 David Low Way - Attachment 4 - Specific Engineering Assessments - Cardno 10-8-17
Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 lot into 6) - RAL17/0501.
1 Assessment of Erosion Prone Area Widths For the purposes of informing permissible development locations in the coastal zone of the Castaways Beach Development site, the Queensland Coastal Hazard Guidelines provided by the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection were used to determine the erosion prone areas widths (EPAW). Appendix A provides the relevant definitions for this coastal management region. 1.1 General Discussion and EPAW Overview The Queensland Coastal Hazard Guidelines (2015) outline a method for assessing erosion prone area widths (EPAWs). These widths are intended to accommodate both short-term and long-term erosion over specified planning periods. This erosion prone area width is a specified horizontal distance back from the HAT water line, and is calculated by the following equation provided in the guidelines. E =[(NxR)+C+S] x (14+F) + D Where:- E = erosion prone area width (metres). N = planning period (years). R = rate of long-term erosion (metres per year). C = short-term erosion from the design storm (metres). S = erosion due to sea level rise (metres). F = factor of safety. D = dune scarp component to allow for slumping of the erosion scarp (metres) The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) has developed default EPAW setback distances at many Queensland coastal sites. For planning purposes, these lines are established for projected sea level rise (SLR) of 0.8m to 2100. At Castaways Beach this default setback distance (from the 2100 HAT contour) is 175m. As part of development plan investigations, the owners at Castaways Beach have engaged Cardno to investigate whether or not a more realistic EPAW line could be developed. Discussions would then be held with DEHP to address such a requested change. 1.1.1 Planning Period (N) The planning period for this erosion prone area width assessment was to 2100. This planning period was deemed the most practical when taking into consideration the design life of the study site structures and appropriate level of risk. This affects the sea level rise applied to present-day highest astronomical tide (HAT).
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.