Council archive · source document
08/0242 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132008.242
ast ———7-—— INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007 jSTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD f me, j 2.1.4 ls any part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road? (C Yes . &) No If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold? [1 Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency. KX No JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, items 1a} and 2 iACID SULFATE SOILS ae | 2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed? in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils? No (1 Yes 2 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cock, Cooloola, Douglas, Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine @ Rivers, Reddliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 4 State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6 * \COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT oe | 2.1.3. Does the proposed use involve the following? © Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district & No (1 Yes © Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the & No Yes construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m? ¢ Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the & No OO Yes enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m? if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency. IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6 (WEGETATIONCLEARNG 4 ee ] 2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following? « Accategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) KI No (Yes @ «= If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation &} No OD Yes JP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 11 . . ICONTAMINATED LAND. - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE ost ° oe | 2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance? (1) Yes - (Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency. ] No IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 72 . (PUBLIC. PASSENGER TRANSPORT, : - ee mee | 2.1.6 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold? (11 Yes - This application must be referred to Queenstand Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency. No IP Requiation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 14 IRAILWAY SAFETY AND-EFFICIENCY . : x . . ST ol 1 2.1.7 Is the proposed use listed in schedule 13D of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified threshold? (1 Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency. —X] No IP Reguiation, schedule 2, table 3, item 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0242 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.