Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

Further submission from John Cochrane in response to amended plans - MCU21/0110

of 27
space, recreation space, bar and restaurant areas. This has not been done. The proposal is
therefore significantly inefficient in planning terms. The effect of this inefficiency will be to
put pressure on to either reduce the size of non-income producing areas or to increase the
number of rooms in order to sustain the scale of these facilities. Indeed, the wing of rooms
deleted being double loaded hotel rooms is an extremely efficient form. Its deletion has
increased the proportion of single loaded corridors.

I believe that if the application were to be approved, it would not be constructed in the
approved from. It is likely that following applications would seek to either increase the
number of rooms or reduce facilities in order to achieve economic viability.




FIGURE 3         ANALYSIS OF BUILDING EFFICIECY

Note – Areas may differ from application due to the inclusion of engineering items such as water tank and pool
equipment. These are included for overall efficiency calculation.


[OCR of page images]
space, recreation space, bar and restaurant areas. This has not been done. The proposal is
therefore significantly inefficient in planning terms. The effect of this inefficiency will be to
put pressure on to either reduce the size of non-income producing areas or to increase the
number of rooms in order to sustain the scale of these facilities. Indeed, the wing of rooms
deleted being double loaded hotel rooms is an extremely efficient form. Its deletion has

increased the proportion of single loaded corridors.

I believe that if the application were to be approved, it would not be constructed in the
approved from. It is likely that following applications would seek to either increase the
number of rooms or reduce facilities in order to achieve economic viability.

 

LOWER GROUND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR

ROOMAREA == 238 M.SQ ROOMAREA = = 527M.SQ.
TRAVEL & ENG. = 395 M.SQ. RESTAURANT AND KITCHEN = 670M.SQ.
GROSS AREA =633M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 880 M.SQ.

GROSS AREA =2,077M.SQ.

 

\
v
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
ROOMAREA = = 880 M.SQ. ROOMAREA = 400 M.SQ.
TRAVEL & ENG. = 302M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG, = 86M.SQ
GROSSAREA = 1182M.SQ. GROSSAREA = 486M.SQ
FIGURE 3 ANALYSIS OF BUILDING EFFICIECY

 

LEVEL 1

ROOMAREA = = 660M.SQ.
TRAVEL & ENG. = 536M.SQ
GROSS AREA = 1196M.SQ.

EFFICIENCY
INCLUDING RESTAURANT/ BOH
= 2705 + 970/ 5574 = 0.66 OR 66%

EXCLUDING RESTAURANT / BOH
= 2705 / 5574 = 0.49 OR 49%

NOTE 65% EFFICIENCY IS COMMON
FOR HIGHLY SERVICED BUILDINGS
SUCH AS HOSPITALS AND
LABORATORIES

TOTAL

ROOMAREA = =: 2,705M.SQ.
RESTAURANT AND KITCHEN == 670N.SQ.
TRAVEL & ENG. = 2,199M.SQ.

GROSS AREA =5,574M.SQ.

Note — Areas may differ from application due to the inclusion of engineering items such as water tank and pool

equipment. These are included for overall efficiency calculation.

Log in to download the original (Further submission from John Cochrane in response to amended plans - MCU21_0110.msg)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.