Original source · versioned page text
Further submission from John Cochrane in response to amended plans - MCU21/0110
space, recreation space, bar and restaurant areas. This has not been done. The proposal is therefore significantly inefficient in planning terms. The effect of this inefficiency will be to put pressure on to either reduce the size of non-income producing areas or to increase the number of rooms in order to sustain the scale of these facilities. Indeed, the wing of rooms deleted being double loaded hotel rooms is an extremely efficient form. Its deletion has increased the proportion of single loaded corridors. I believe that if the application were to be approved, it would not be constructed in the approved from. It is likely that following applications would seek to either increase the number of rooms or reduce facilities in order to achieve economic viability. FIGURE 3 ANALYSIS OF BUILDING EFFICIECY Note – Areas may differ from application due to the inclusion of engineering items such as water tank and pool equipment. These are included for overall efficiency calculation. [OCR of page images] space, recreation space, bar and restaurant areas. This has not been done. The proposal is therefore significantly inefficient in planning terms. The effect of this inefficiency will be to put pressure on to either reduce the size of non-income producing areas or to increase the number of rooms in order to sustain the scale of these facilities. Indeed, the wing of rooms deleted being double loaded hotel rooms is an extremely efficient form. Its deletion has increased the proportion of single loaded corridors. I believe that if the application were to be approved, it would not be constructed in the approved from. It is likely that following applications would seek to either increase the number of rooms or reduce facilities in order to achieve economic viability. LOWER GROUND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR ROOMAREA == 238 M.SQ ROOMAREA = = 527M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 395 M.SQ. RESTAURANT AND KITCHEN = 670M.SQ. GROSS AREA =633M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 880 M.SQ. GROSS AREA =2,077M.SQ. \ v LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 ROOMAREA = = 880 M.SQ. ROOMAREA = 400 M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 302M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG, = 86M.SQ GROSSAREA = 1182M.SQ. GROSSAREA = 486M.SQ FIGURE 3 ANALYSIS OF BUILDING EFFICIECY LEVEL 1 ROOMAREA = = 660M.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 536M.SQ GROSS AREA = 1196M.SQ. EFFICIENCY INCLUDING RESTAURANT/ BOH = 2705 + 970/ 5574 = 0.66 OR 66% EXCLUDING RESTAURANT / BOH = 2705 / 5574 = 0.49 OR 49% NOTE 65% EFFICIENCY IS COMMON FOR HIGHLY SERVICED BUILDINGS SUCH AS HOSPITALS AND LABORATORIES TOTAL ROOMAREA = =: 2,705M.SQ. RESTAURANT AND KITCHEN == 670N.SQ. TRAVEL & ENG. = 2,199M.SQ. GROSS AREA =5,574M.SQ. Note — Areas may differ from application due to the inclusion of engineering items such as water tank and pool equipment. These are included for overall efficiency calculation.
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.