Council archive · source document
09/0325 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132009.325
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 oO . IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22
oe See ote “ashe a
SECTION 2° seaivit ine Sepeaon al chit fiermiges.
Section 2. must be completed when the ‘pplication seeks approval t to make a materia chai ie of use of premises.
STATE: PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS.AND:PLANNING SCHEM
21 Is the proposed use assessable under any State planning regulatory provisions?
EX] No (Yes
If no, is the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?
oO No - Goto 2.2 & Yes - Complete Form 1, Part D and answer Q2.1.1 - 2.1.13 below
STATE- CONTROLLED. ROAD. : q :
241 Is any part of the premises located i in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State- controlled. road? . .
Clyés No , . — :
mo s Ire proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1 998 and does itexceed the specified
resho
No — {_] Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (OMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Requiatian, schedule 2, table 3, items
2.1.2 is the use proposed in ina local goverment area ited? in Sta Pléning Policy 202: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils? wt ‘ a ss rs doh
Be, ay ¥ f
[XJ No - Goto 02.1.3 CYes ~ a ' Fe ht tty
21 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, “Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Caims, Coallope! “Caloundra: Cardwell, Carpentatia Cook, Cooloola, Douglas, we :
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, {sis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirlum Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine aw
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday . ‘
5 ha
IP Regulation, schedule 2, iable 2, item 4; State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 36 “4
ay
. +
213 Is any v par of the premises | ovale i ina coastal management cstiet? coe : ad
. 4 *
DX} No- Gots o2.14 Cves . 4 ma, Ce ‘
IP Regulation soheduld. 2, tablo a tom 6. : a moet :
2.1.4 Do the premises 28 include alot tontaining the following? . ne
Sow ” ‘e
(i) A category 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) « " Ba.No. [Yes ao
(ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation 4 ’ BINo - (1Yes
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 9, item 14 .
215 Is ny part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance? 2 oR Oe
D<] No - Go to 02.1.6 oO Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part N) This application must be referred fo the Administering Authority 3 as Concurrence .
Agency, '
Ip Regulation, sohedtle 2. table item 12 so . ve nye # ww”
. rare . arene MTs
216 Is the proposed u use e oF premises listed ir in schedule 13C: or the integrated Pinning Regulation 1 998 and does it exceed the, ;
specified threshold?” . . . vitor A
XK) No - Goto. 02.4.7 si) Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (Q7) as Concurrence Agency. » ~ : re
IP Regulation, schedule 2, fable.) item 14 . . . Loe
a 7 "Is ee err : nit listed in schedule 13D of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it t exceed the
specified threshold? .
X) No - Goto 02.1.8 oO Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
1P Regufalion, schedule 2, table 3, fem 15 soe : : . , *
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
09/0325 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 8.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.