Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Report and Appendices - Cooroibah
Attached to the e-mail Changed MCU application addition of OPW Application MCU16/0099 & OPW16/0218.
The original of this document is very large (14.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
the structure allow for fish passage And
of all fish attempting to move through
the crossing at all flows up to the AO24.3 The crossing and associated erosion protection N/A Refer to Response AO24.1.
drownout of the structure. structures are installed at no steeper gradient than the
waterway bed gradient.
And
Editor’s note: For guidance on when a
waterway crossing is not considered to be AO24.4 The crossing and associated erosion protection N/A Refer to Response AO24.1.
waterway barrier work see the Department of structures are roughened throughout to approximately
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 2014 fact
simulate natural bed conditions.
sheet Maintaining Fish Passage in
Queensland: What is not a Waterway Barrier And
Work?
AO24.5 The lowest point of the crossing is installed at the N/A Refer to Response AO24.1.
level of the lowest point of the natural stream bed (pre-
construction), within the footprint of the proposed
crossing.
And
AO24.6 There is a height difference from the lowest point N/A Refer to Response AO24.1.
of the crossing to the edges of the low flow section of the
crossing to channel water into the low flow section.
And
AO24.7 The level of the remainder of the crossing is no N/A Refer to Response AO24.1.
higher than the lowest point of the natural stream bed
outside of the low flow channel.
PO25 All waterway barriers are AO25.1 Hydraulic conditions (depth, velocities and The proposed works relate to the replacement of the
designed, constructed and maintained to turbulence) from the downstream to the upstream limit of existing culvert. The works will not impact on the existing
provide adequate fish passage for the the structure allow for fish passage of all fish attempting to low flow channel of the waterway and will therefore not
site and fish passage is provided for the move through the barrier at all flows up to the drownout of result in a substantial or measurable change in the
life of the barrier. the structure. hydrological regime of the waterway.
And The proposed works do not create a barrier to fish
movement.
AO25.2 Aperture size of openings (for example, at N/A No track racks to be deployed.
screens or trash racks) ensures adequate fish passage.
And
AO25.3 Hydraulic conditions are such that adequate fish The proposed works relate to the replacement of the
passage is provided. existing culvert. The works will not impact on the existing
And low flow channel of the waterway and will therefore not
result in a substantial or measurable change in the
hydrological regime of the waterway.
State development assessment provisions Module 5 — Fisheries resources 5.2 Constructing or raising waterway barrier works in fish habitats state code
22 July 2016 V1.9 Page 17 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.