Council archive · source document
Objection-MCU130092 · MCU13/0092
Attached to the e-mail Properly made submission (object) Tony Fitzgerald MCU13/0092.
Objection to a proposed integrated shopping complex development at Peregian Beach on land zoned Open Space/ Recreation in both the Noosa Plan 2006 and the draft Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme (2012). To: The Chief Executive Officer Sunshine Coast Council Locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mail Centre, QLD [email protected] File No: MCU13/0092 Name of Applicant: Multispan Australia Postal Address of Land: 5‐7 Rufous Street, Peregian Beach. Proposal: Integrated shopping complex development. We object to the proposed development for the following reasons. Despite increased development pressure over the last decade, Peregian Beach has evolved gradually and incrementally, enabling a settled and friendly community to enjoy a quiet, integrated, attractive shopping precinct comprised substantially of shops surrounding a central square within easy walking distance of the other shops. On the other hand, the “area is generally under-provided for with recreational parks”, as acknowledged in the Sunshine Coast Council Open Space Strategy 2011 (2011:35), and the Rufous Street site which is the subject of the current development application is part of an important area of open space which includes the Tennis Courts, Community House, Kindergarten, Veggie Village and Di Hurst Oval. Even considered in isolation, Rufous Street is an unsuitable location for a shopping complex. Viewed in context, the proposal to develop a complex there is an opportunistic attempt by outside interests to profit at the expense of Peregian's unique characteristics. A Bowling Club with no connection to the area bought land zoned Open Space/ Recreation and intended for recreational use, paid a price commensurate with that use and is free to sell the land for that use, but instead seeks to obtain a windfall profit by selling the land to a developer, also with no connection to the area, which in turn wants to profit from developing the land for an unsuitable purpose, depriving the local community of scarce recreational land, imposing an unneeded and unwelcome shopping precinct on a community which is satisfied with and well-served by its existing shopping facilities and damaging the special sense of community which is provided by the location of Peregian village around and immediately adjacent to the central square. An unnecessary rival precinct on the unsuitable Rufous Street site would decentralise local retail outlets and significantly increase vehicular traffic whereas, with good planning, the existing precinct will expand at a pace and in a manner with which local residents and businesses are comfortable and the calm village ambience will be preserved. It would be most regrettable if one of the Sunshine Coast Council's last important planning decisions in relation to land which will soon become part of the new Noosa Shire permanently damaged current and future Peregian communities. Objectors: Catherine Fitzgerald and Gerald Edward Fitzgerald Address: 78 Peregian Esplanade, Peregian Beach, 4573. Date: 19 August 2013.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Used in these records
Objection-MCU130092.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 32 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.