Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

20240510_NSC_Cover letter_M1717P_ Civil OPW minor change (2) · OPW12/0095.03

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

.




    Substantially Different Criteria                              Response
    A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:
        a) involves a new use                                     Complies – the change does not involve a new use
        b) results in the application applying to a new parcel Complies – the proposed change will not result in any
           of land; or                                            new parcels of land being included as part of the
                                                                  application
        c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of        Complies – the proposed change does not involve any
           scale, bulk, and appearance; or                        changes to the approved built form
        d) changes the ability of the proposed development Complies – the proposed change does not change the
           to operate as intended; or                             ability for the development to operate as intended
        e) removes a component that is integral to the            Complies – The proposed change does not remove a
           operation of the development; or                       component that is integral to the development
        f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the          Complies – The proposed amendments will not result in
           transport network, such as increasing traffic to       any additional impacts not already addressed as part of
           the site; or                                           the original approval
        g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of Complies – The proposed amendment will not result in
           known impacts; or                                      increased severity of known impacts.
        h) removes an incentive or offset component that          Complies – the proposed change does not remove any
           would have balanced a negative impact of the           incentive or offset component of the proposed
           development; or                                        development.
        i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.                  Complies – the proposed minor change does not result in
                                                                  any adverse impacts on infrastructure provisions.
Table 2 – Substantially different criteria (Schedule 1 – Development Assessment Rules)


Affected Entities
Not applicable

Summary

As demonstrated above, the proposed minor change to the existing development approval represents a minor change
under s78 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the proposed change does
not result in ‘substantially different development’, require any additional referral agencies, or changes the level of
assessment in the event the application was to be re-lodged. The change to approval also does not trigger any
requirement for public notification.

The applicable application fee for a minor change to a development approval – minor matters (as determined by
Manager, Development Assessment) is $2516.00 in accordance with Council’s fees and charges register 2023/2024. This
fee will be paid upon receipt of Council’s payment advice.

In support of our request, please find enclosed the following:
     Attachment A: DA Form 5
     Attachment B: Owner’s Consent
     Attachment C: Proposal plans (Civil OPW’s) plans prepared by JFP Urban Consultants
     Attachment D: Endorsed GIA plans (Council ref: OPW12/0095.02)




JFP Ref: M1717E                                                                                                Page 5


[OCR of page images]
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Substantially Different Criteria | Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:

a) involves a new use Complies — the change does not involve a new use

b) results in the application applying to a new parcel | Complies — the proposed change will not result in any
of land; or new parcels of land being included as part of the

application

c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of Complies — the proposed change does not involve any
scale, bulk, and appearance; or changes to the approved built form

d) changes the ability of the proposed development | Complies — the proposed change does not change the
to operate as intended; or ability for the development to operate as intended

e) removes a component that is integral to the Complies — The proposed change does not remove a
operation of the development; or component that is integral to the development

f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the Complies — The proposed amendments will not result in
transport network, such as increasing traffic to any additional impacts not already addressed as part of
the site; or the original approval

g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of | Complies — The proposed amendment will not result in
known impacts; or increased severity of known impacts.

h) removes an incentive or offset component that Complies — the proposed change does not remove any
would have balanced a negative impact of the incentive or offset component of the proposed
development; or development.

i) impacts on infrastructure provisions. Complies — the proposed minor change does not result in

any adverse impacts on infrastructure provisions.

 

 

Table 2 — Substantially different criteria (Schedule 1 — Development Assessment Rules)

Affected Entities
Not applicable

Summary

As demonstrated above, the proposed minor change to the existing development approval represents a minor change

under s78 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the proposed change does

not result in ‘substantially different development’, require any additional referral agencies, or changes the level of

assessment in the event the application was to be re-lodged.

requirement for public notification.

The change to approval also does not trigger any

The applicable application fee for a minor change to a development approval — minor matters (as determined by

Manager, Development Assessment) is $2516.00 in accordance with Council’s fees and charges register 2023/2024. This

fee will be paid upon receipt of Council’s payment advice.

In support of our request, please find enclosed the following:

= Attachment A: DA Form 5
= Attachment B: Owner’s Consent

= Attachment C: Proposal plans (Civil OPW’s) plans prepared by JFP Urban Consultants
= Attachment D: Endorsed GIA plans (Council ref: OPW12/0095.02)

JFP Ref: M1717E

Page 5

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
373 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

20240510_NSC_Cover letter_M1717P_ Civil OPW minor change (2).pdf · 373 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.