08/1927 - MCU - Detached House - Part 2 [As Published] · 132008.1927

Page 2

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 Part 0, Version 3.1, 3 March 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mandatory information
6, Confirm that the following mandatory information accompanies this application:
Conti irmation, of.
o rdgement “Method ‘of lodgement

For all applications
(i) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed use on the premises and a statement about the

intensity and scale of the proposed use (e.g. number of employees, days and hours of operation, number of visitors, [xX] Confirmed

number of seats, capacity of storage area)
When the application involv x : cas
(ii) Plans showing the size and location of the buildings to be reused []  Contirmed

Not applicable

 

When the’ ‘application’ Involves: new! -bultding work"

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ili) Plans showing the size and location of the proposed new building work SX] Confirmed
{-] Not applicable
When the application lrivolves'reuge of other existing works ne ee
{iv) Plans showing the nature and location of the works to be reused {-]_ Confirmed
DX] Not applicable
When the application involves new operational work i buen LS
(v) Plans showing the nature and location of the proposed new operational works oO Confirmed
EX] Not appticable
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date received Reference numbers
Advice for completing Part D
General advice
* Part A must also be completed for all IDAS development applications.
. The applicant is responsible for answering all questions fully and correctly, unless following a response there is a statement to go directly to
another question.
. When paying fees to the Environmental Protection Agency by electronic funds transfer (EFT) for coastal development applications, use the

process from the information sheet Electronically paying fees to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and securely attach the form
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT} payment notification to this application.

 

Q3 A development permit authorises development to occur. A preliminary approval is a step in the approval process and does not authorise
development to occur - a subsequent application for a development permit must be sought.

 

Table D If the MCU application involves operational work that is the building of a retaining wall on the premises, the application is taken also to be for the
operational work if approval for the operational work has not been applied for in this application or in a separate application.

 

 

Page 3

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answering the following questions will assist you in determining which sections of the checklist must be completed for your application. If
unsure, phone or visit your local government or log onto the DIP website www.dip.qid.gov.au for help
For all IDAS development applications (except those for building work requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975 only) - complete Section 4 of this
checklist

oe : ne
Does the application seek approval to materially change use of the premises? Byes |CINe

     

 

 

 

 

 

LE yeS ~ oC ‘@ Section 2 of tds chackist
Does the application seek approval to reconfigure a lot? ClYes No
if yas - completa Section 3 of this checkist and Part F of IDAS Application Form 1 Assessmant is hy the local government. o
Does the application seek approval to carry out operational work?

ppl PPI Carry out op Yes |XINo

 

if yes - complete Section 4 af ist

 

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Fisheries Act 1994? clYes

 

 

  

No
i yes - compiele Saction J of Si &
eived a referral agency response under section 3.3.2.0f the IPA, in relation to this development application?
Section &o! OYes |KINo

 

 

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against a local government planning
scheme? OYes |—XINo
if yes ~ cumpielo Part B of IDAS Application Foon 1. Assessment is by the local government.

Does the application seek approval to carry out building work requiring assessment against the Building Act 1975?
H yes - 9¢ tc Appendix khag eferals, Complete Part B of DAS “oan 1 (Yes |No

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessmont is by a bulking ce

 

 
 

 

 

 

HERITAGE. Lh a wes. a a 4 Ss
141A |s any part of the proposal intended to be carried out on a Queensland Heritage place under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

(X] No-cotor18 = ([] Yes

 

 

Page 4

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

1.1B Does the proposal invoive development, other than development mentioned in the Integrated Planning Act 1997 Schedule 9
(development that is exempt from assessment against a planning scheme), that is intended to be carried out on a place entered in
a Local Heritage Register under Part 11 of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

x] No - Go fo Q1.2 oO Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part C;) This application requires assessment by the relevant local government agsinst the IDAS
Cove in the Queensland Herilage Regulation 2003. ifthe development involves building work and the local
government is not the Assessment Manager for the application, ihe local government has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agency.

       

REMOVING QUARRY MATERIAL: WILD RIVER AREA”

4.2 Does the proposal involve removing quarry material from a watercourse or lake as defined under the Water Act 2000?
X] No-Gotoa7.3 ((] Yes

 

  

ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ACT: DRIVER AR :
1.3 Does the proposal involve an environmentally relevant activity (ERA), other than a mining activity or a petroleum activity?
No-Gotoai4 [_] Yes

 

WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ‘APORT wo : : S
14 ls any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
DX] No - Goto 1.5

[] Yes

DECLARED FISH HABITAT AREA

1.5 Does any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?
BX] No - Goto Q7.6

Oo Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8, this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries (DPIGF), If DPI&F is not the
Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

 

   

COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE : ony
1.6 Is any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?

1X] No - Goto Q4.7

LD Yes

 

   

WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT

 

17 Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?
DX] No -Encot Section? [_]

Yes

 
   

 

PLANNING SCHEME ee : By
2.4 |s the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?
LJ No - Goto. 92.2 DX] Yes - Comnpiote Form 1, Part D and answer Q2.1.1 - 2.1.13 below
Ifyes, does the application request that the proposal be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?

IX) No — ([] Yes- (Complete Form 1 Attachment 1)

Page 5

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD “s Soe
214 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road’?

LI Yes No

If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the infegrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?
® No O Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Mairi Roads (OMR) as Concurrence Agency.

ee

  

ACID SULFATE SOILS
2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed?! in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?
[X] No-Geioa213 ([] Yes

21 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, tsis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vate, Mornington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

  

COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?

(i) Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district No (Yes

(ii) Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the (4 No DO Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?

{ii} Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, that is the  B] No Lo Yes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

If yes to any one of (i) - (ili) above - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Concurrence Agency.

VEGETATION CLEARING

2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?
(i) Avcategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) & No Yes
(ii) If there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation & No 1 Yes

 

CONTAMINATED EAND:- UNEXPLODED ORDNANGE feo"
2.1.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?

DX] No - Go to 02.7.6 C1 Yes-
Age

 
  
 

‘his application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence

PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT

2.1.6 Is the proposed use of premises listed in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
Xl] No - Go to 02.1.7 | Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

RAILWAY SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY /
2.1.7 Is the proposed use of premises listed in schedule 13D of the /ntegrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?

XX] No - Goto Q2.1.8 Cl Yes ~ This application must be referred io Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.

 
 

KOALA CONSERVATION’. pe : ae
2.1.8 Is any part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area?
[X] No- Gotoo219 (_] Yes

fe

 

 

 

Page 6

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS. Be

     

2.1.9 Is the use associated with reconfiguring a lot?
L] Yes-Gotoa21.70 BX] No - Answer eo

 

(a) Will any part of any structure or work that is the natural and ordinary consequence of the use, be located in an
easement?
No-Goto(s) [7] Yes. - Answer both 1) and (i) below

(b) |s any part of the premises situated within 100m of a substation site under the Electricity Act 1994?
DX] No (1 Yes. - This application must be referred (0 the anlity responsible for the substation as Advice Agency.

     

RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A WILD RIVER AREA

2.1.10 — 1s any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
DX] No -Gotoa2it7 (_] Yes

 
 

WETLAND -
2.1.11 1s the proposal only for the construction or use of a single residence on a lot and any reasonably associated building or structure?
DX) Yes -Gotoa21.72 [7] No

HERITAGE : ce :
2.1.12 Do the premises include a lot sharing a common boundary with a Queensland Heritage place under the Queensland Heritage Act
1992?

    

x No - Go to 2.1.13 oO Yes - This application must be referred to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Advice Agency.

 

CERTAIN PRELIMINARY APPROVALS
2.1.13 Is preliminary approval sought for the application under the IPA, section 3.1.67
BX] No - Goto 02.2 D1 Yes-

 

1 This application must be referred to the Dapariment of Infrastructure
and Planning (Oh IP} as Advice Agency.

 

 

BROTHEL >

2.2 {s the proposed use a brothel as defined under the Prostitution Act 1999?
DX] No -Gotoaz3  (_] Yes

 

STRATEGK PORT LAND
2.3 \s any part of the use proposed on Strategic Port Land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
EX] No - Go to. 024 OY Yes

     
  

 

MAJOR HAZAI fe : : .
24 Is the proposed use a major hazard facility or possible major hazard facility under the Dangerous Goods is Safely Management Act
20017?

   

 

X No - Go fo 02.5 oO Yes - ait L) This application requires assessment by the Department of Emergency Services

is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence

 

(DES). If Di
Agency.

Page 7

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

CONTAMINATED LAND | ED LAND

25 is any part of the land forming the premises on the Environmental Management Register or Contaminated Land Register under the
Environmental Protection Act 1994?
b No-Gotoazé ([_] Yes

rapt

    

    

 

CONTAMINATED LAND 2 NOTIFIABLE iactivity :
2.6 Is any part of the land forming the premises currently used for a notifiable le activity, or if there is no existing use was it last used for

a notifiable activity?

LI Yes

   
 
 

DX] No -Goteo27

  

 

CONTAMINATED LAND ~ INDUSTRIAL ACTIVIT

27 Is any part of the premises currently used for an industrial activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity), or if there
is no existing use was it last used for an industrial activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
[XJ No -Gotoaze (_] Yes
CONTAMINATED LAND “AREA MANAGEMENT ADVICE (NATURAL MINERALISATION OR INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY)
2.8 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for natura! mineralisation or industrial
activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
DX] No - Go to Q2.9

(J Yes

 

 

  

AQUACULTURE: WILD RIVER AREA
2.9 Is the proposed use for aquaculture as defined under the Fisheries Act 1994?
DX] No -Gotoa270 [_] Yes

 
   

AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ACTIVE |

2.10 Is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
XI No -cowa2it [7] Yes

 

SEQ REGIONAL PLAN
2.11A _ Is any part of the premises s within the South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan area?
DX] No -Gotoa2.748 [_] Yes

 
      

STATE PLANNING REGULATORY PROVISIONS
2.11B Is any part of the premises within a designated region under Schedule 4 of the draft regulatory provisions?
[J No -GotQ212 (_] Yes

REGIONAL PLANS)

 

CONSERVATION ESTATE, : :

2.12 \s the proposal for urban purposes, as defined under the IPA?
EX] No -GotoQ2.73 (_] Yes

REMOVAL, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT

2.13 Does the proposed use involve the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?
DX] No -EndofSection2 [_] Yes

Page 8

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

 

Disclaimer:
While the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) believes that this information contained on this form and provided as part of
this process will be of assistance to you, it is provided on the basis that you will not rely on the information without first making your own
enquiries regarding the interpretation and application of the applicable legislation to your circumstances.

To the full extent permitted by law DIP expressly disclaims all liability (including but not limited to liability for negligence) for errors or
omissions of any kind or for any loss (including direct and indirect losses), damage or other consequence which may arise from your
reliance on this process and the information contained on this form.