Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

08/1927 - MCU - Detached House - Part 2 [As Published] · 132008.1927

of 8

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

1.1B Does the proposal invoive development, other than development mentioned in the Integrated Planning Act 1997 Schedule 9
(development that is exempt from assessment against a planning scheme), that is intended to be carried out on a place entered in
a Local Heritage Register under Part 11 of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?

x] No - Go fo Q1.2 oO Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part C;) This application requires assessment by the relevant local government agsinst the IDAS
Cove in the Queensland Herilage Regulation 2003. ifthe development involves building work and the local
government is not the Assessment Manager for the application, ihe local government has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agency.

       

REMOVING QUARRY MATERIAL: WILD RIVER AREA”

4.2 Does the proposal involve removing quarry material from a watercourse or lake as defined under the Water Act 2000?
X] No-Gotoa7.3 ((] Yes

 

  

ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ACT: DRIVER AR :
1.3 Does the proposal involve an environmentally relevant activity (ERA), other than a mining activity or a petroleum activity?
No-Gotoai4 [_] Yes

 

WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ‘APORT wo : : S
14 ls any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
DX] No - Goto 1.5

[] Yes

DECLARED FISH HABITAT AREA

1.5 Does any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?
BX] No - Goto Q7.6

Oo Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8, this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries (DPIGF), If DPI&F is not the
Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.

 

   

COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE : ony
1.6 Is any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?

1X] No - Goto Q4.7

LD Yes

 

   

WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT

 

17 Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?
DX] No -Encot Section? [_]

Yes

 
   

 

PLANNING SCHEME ee : By
2.4 |s the proposed use assessable under the planning scheme?
LJ No - Goto. 92.2 DX] Yes - Comnpiote Form 1, Part D and answer Q2.1.1 - 2.1.13 below
Ifyes, does the application request that the proposal be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?

IX) No — ([] Yes- (Complete Form 1 Attachment 1)

Used in these records

About this file

File size
663 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1927 - MCU - Detached House - Part 2 [As Published].pdf · 663 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.