Council archive · source document
08/0022 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132008.22
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997
[eANo
If no, is any ERA an item 20 ERA (extracting rock or other material} intended to be located outside
waters?
IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
[_] No - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, and the
application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it.
(Complete Part G) This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the
purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act 2005. if the
Administering Authonity is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction
as Concurrence Agency.
[) Yes
If yes, does the ERA meet the following?
e the activity is located inside a flood management area and a Ko L] Yes
borrow pit of not more than 10,000m? for -
e specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005; or
» residential complexes, as defined under the
Environmental Protection Act 1994
e the activity is located outside a flood management area io LI Yes
if yes to either - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the
land, and the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager
must refuse to receive it. (Complete Part G) This application requires assessment by the
Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental! Protection Act 1994
and, subject to the relevant dectaration for the wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2005. If
the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency
has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
ff no to both - An application for the ERA would be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment
manager must refuse to receive it.
IPA schedule 8 pa 1 table 7. fem 7
iPA 9,hadula &, part 1. fabie §. toms 2 and 4
IP Reuulaton schedule Z lable dg #eme f aad 24
Enwronmental Protection Aci 1994, section 794A fwid ner ufee;
reid River Act 2005 sechon 434
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A PORT
1.4 |\Is any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport infrastructure Act 1994?
No
[] Yes
If yes, is that part of the premises below high water mark?
No
[-] Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA,
schedule 8 — Answer (a) to (c) below. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority for the land. if you
answer no to (a), (b) and (c) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.
(a) Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?
No
("] Yes -— The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
(b) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or
spoil grounds?
No
[-] Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
(c) 1s any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?
No
[-] Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
wa e fe 4 ” wage, 42 seria pey F sya mama
iP Reg: lavgr texte 2 fap 2 keg ty ang 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0022 - MCU - Detached House [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.