Original source · versioned page text
MCU21/0110 - Comment on Amended plans from John Cochrane
less than 25%, which is relatively proposes 25% site cover for no gain in
low. terms of the stated objectives of the zone.
There is also a minor increase in The proposed 19 bay car park is noted as
parking with one additional standard “overflow car park” on the landscape
carpark and one plans. It is most probable that this will be a
additional PWD carpark being permanently used car park due to the poor
provided. The number of undercover provision of guest parking. We believe
carparks has also that the introduction of this car park is
increased from 107 to 188 because functional and relates to function use. The
of the relocation of the tennis courts car park seems to lack an accessible path
and the solar as defined under BCA Vol. 1 D3.2
panels (discussed below).
With respect to other changes being As noted elsewhere, we believe that the
made, the applicant is intending to landscape design has been developed to
make use of the area facilitate and enhance the functions access.
of the site which originally contained It also provides an ideal wedding
the tennis courts, given the NJKHTs photography site.
are being retained.
This area is to be used for passive
recreation as shown in the amended
Landscape Concept
It is logical to make some use of this We take exception to the proposal that
part of the site while maintaining the resort facilities are a logical partner to
koala habitat. This koala habitat regeneration. The intensity of
vegetated area will now be a feature development in the area will offset the
of the resort with the pathways and minor regenerative works proposed.
other facilities being
integrated and linking to other usable
open space areas and the lagoon
pool.
The above are the only changes We believe that the changes are not minor
made to the proposal plans and and only underscore the inadequacy of the
constitute a minor change application. The presence of a 500 seat
function facility cannot be ignored. It is
not identified in the application nor are its
impacts addressed or mitigated. It is not
addressed in any agency referral.
The proposed minor change has been We believe that the amended plans and
made in response to further issues specifically the addition of a new on grade
raised by Council car park and ceremonial garden areas are a
about the impact the proposal will significant change. They indicate a pattern
have on koala habitat trees and other of use not described in the application.
vegetation. This has
resulted in the relocation of all tennis Further, the acoustic and other
courts above the upper carpark environmental effects of the changes are
levels. not addressed.
JC-NSH-amended plans– Issue A 4 20 February-23
[OCR of page images]
less than 25%, which is relatively
low.
proposes 25% site cover for no gain in
terms of the stated objectives of the zone.
There is also a minor increase in
parking with one additional standard
carpark and one
additional PWD carpark being
provided. The number of undercover
carparks has also
increased from 107 to 188 because
of the relocation of the tennis courts
and the solar
panels (discussed below).
The proposed 19 bay car park is noted as
“overflow car park” on the landscape
plans. It is most probable that this will be a
permanently used car park due to the poor
provision of guest parking. We believe
that the introduction of this car park is
functional and relates to function use. The
car park seems to lack an accessible path
as defined under BCA Vol. 1 D3.2
With respect to other changes being
made, the applicant is intending to
make use of the area
of the site which originally contained
the tennis courts, given the NJKHTs
are being retained.
This area is to be used for passive
recreation as shown in the amended
Landscape Concept
As noted elsewhere, we believe that the
landscape design has been developed to
facilitate and enhance the functions access.
It also provides an ideal wedding
photography site.
It is logical to make some use of this
part of the site while maintaining the
koala habitat. This
vegetated area will now be a feature
of the resort with the pathways and
other facilities being
integrated and linking to other usable
open space areas and the lagoon
pool.
We take exception to the proposal that
resort facilities are a logical partner to
koala habitat regeneration. The intensity of
development in the area will offset the
minor regenerative works proposed.
The above are the only changes
made to the proposal plans and
constitute a minor change
We believe that the changes are not minor
and only underscore the inadequacy of the
application. The presence of a 500 seat
function facility cannot be ignored. It is
not identified in the application nor are its
impacts addressed or mitigated. It is not
addressed in any agency referral.
The proposed minor change has been
made in response to further issues
raised by Council
about the impact the proposal will
have on koala habitat trees and other
vegetation. This has
resulted in the relocation of all tennis
courts above the upper carpark
levels.
We believe that the amended plans and
specifically the addition of a new on grade
car park and ceremonial garden areas are a
significant change. They indicate a pattern
of use not described in the application.
Further, the acoustic and other
environmental effects of the changes are
not addressed.
JC-NSH-amended plans- Issue A
4 20 February-23
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (MCU21_0110 - Comment on Amended plans from John Cochrane.msg)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.