Original source · versioned page text
2022-04-21 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 21 APRIL 2022
b. The proposal seeks to establish a new short-term visitor accommodation
facility within a recently approved dual occupancy and is not located within a
well-established resort or holiday units.
3. The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.4.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(t)
and Performance Outcome PO21 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code as:
a. Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental
impacts on the residential amenity of permanent residents.
b. While the code seeks to maintain visitor accommodation in the area, it does
not seek to increase the extent of visitor accommodation within the area to
the detriment of permanent residents.
4. The proposal is not consistent with 9.3.5.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (1) and
(2)(f) of the Visitor Accommodation Code as:
a. The proposed visitor accommodation is not appropriately located and
integrated with permanent residents in the area given the number and
density of properties currently being used for visitor accommodation and/or
permitted for visitor accommodation.
b. The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity
enjoyed by residents.
5. There is no need for additional short-term accommodation in the area.
6. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor
Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and
Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely
parking demands on site.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
5 OPW21/0133 – APPLICATION FOR OPERATIONAL WORK (PRESCRIBED TIDAL
WORKS) AT 10-12 RAVENWOOD DRIVE NOOSA HEADS
That Council note the report by the Development Engineer to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 12 April 2022 regarding OPW21/0133 application for Operational
Works (Prescribed Tidal Works) and request a further report for the Ordinary Meeting providing
an alternative motion for approval:
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal is contrary to PO1, PO9, PO13, and PO19 of the Waterways Works
Code as it:
1.1. will lead to cluttering and adverse amenity impacts on the character and
amenity of the waterway and adjoining lots;
1.2. includes works outside the prolongation of boundaries of the lot;
1.3 will result in berthed vessels encroaching over the prolongation of boundaries of the lot;
1.4 when all vessels are moored, prevents the jet skis from leaving its dry storage
pontoon;
1.5 will result in adverse amenity impacts and potential conflicts with users of the
neighbouring jetty and put at risk users’ safety.
B. Advise the applicant that the jetty must be modified to comply with the approved plans
of development.
Page 14 of 33
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.