Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

07/2398 - Traffic report · 132007.2398

of 95

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

 

 

 

 

The analysis indicates that, provided the intersection is signalised (by others), the Elm Street /
Diamond Street intersection will function at a satisfactory degree of saturation into and beyond
the planning horizon year of 2019 with the combined base traffic volumes and those of the
ultimate development proposal.

It should be noted that the traffic generated by the proposal appears to have a minimal impact
on the operation of the intersection, as it only results in an increase in the maximum degree of
saturation of 0.02 for the critical movement over the base case for the 2019 scenario. This is a
reflection that the development represents less than 5% of the traffic through the intersection.
Therefore, no works are required at this intersection as a consequence of the development.

5.2.2 Elm Street / Pearsons Road Intersection
The results of the traffic analysis for the 2019 scenario including both base traffic and traffic

generated by the proposed development are presented in Table 9. The intersection Movement
Summary data (from SIDRA3.2) are provided in Appendix C.

Table 9: 2019 Design Intersection Analysis — Elm Street / Pearsons Road Intersection (with
Right Tum Lane from Elm Street)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Movement Volume Degree of Delay (s) 95” %ile Queue
Saturation 0) _{m)
AM Peak Hour
Elm Street South (1) 279 0.15 0 0
Elm Street South (R) 71 0.08 11.7 3
Pearsons Road East (L) 101 0.19 13.9 6
_Pearsons Road East (R) | 4 0.19 14.0 6
Elm Street North (L) 6 0.39 B82 0
Elm Street North (T) 734— 0.39 _O 0
PM Peak Hour
Elm Street South (1) 515 0.27 0 0
Elm Street South (R) |. 90 0.09 10.6 3
Pearsons Road East (L) 56 0.12 ; 13.6 4
Pearsons Road East (R) 12 0.12 13.5 4
Elm Street North (L) 6 0.29 8.2 0
Elm Street North (T) §33 0.29 0 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Practical Maximum Degree of Saturation (X,) for unsignalised intersections is 0.80.

The analysis indicates that introduction of the traffic generated by the proposed development will
have minimal impacts on the capacity or operations of the intersection of Elm Street and
Pearsons Road following implementation of the ultimate development by 2019, provided the
recommended intersection improvements are undertaken (i.e. construction of a right-turn bay
from Elm Street into Pearsons Road as shown on Figure A2 within Appendix A of this report).

 

3427-001(1}-Finat.doc: 04/12/07

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
4.9 MB (large file)
File type
TIF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2398 - Traffic report.tif · 4.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.