Original source · versioned page text
2014-04-28 General Committee Meeting Agenda Pages 1-64
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2014
Page 18 of 200
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2014
|
S Hloydeonsv/in |
eervoerntl fences:
2.5 Theme 5: Fees and Charges
Examination of options for alternative fees and charges structures
Background: NC provides a kerbside waste and recycling collection service to specific,
predominantly urban residential areas. Some 350 rural households do not receive a
kerbside service. Presently Council residents who do not receive a kerbside service
are not required to pay rates for waste management. However, the waste
management component of NC’s rates provides funding for the operation of three
transfer stations, the Eumundi Road Landfill, public place waste and recycling
services, street cleaning, the policing and enforcement of illegal dumping and
community education on waste reduction. All NC area residents benefit from these
facilities and activities, regardless of whether they receive a kerbside service, and
should contribute to their provision.
Previously NC levied a fee on rural properties not receiving a service and a disc was
provided which allowed a number of free visits to transfer stations.
For example, Gympie Regional Council applies an alternative waste charge in the
form of an annual $85 “Waste Management Charge” on all properties vacant and
developed. The charge Is collected to cover Council costs for capping and closure of
old landfills and upgrades or establishment of transfer stations. In addition,
properties not serviced by a kerbside collection pay an annual "Waste Management
Operations Charge" of $230.
Further, Council presently undercharges full cost disposal fees on the dumping of
small loads. NC is aware that gate fees charged for trailer loads of waste disposed of
at transfer stations do not cover the full cost for disposal.
Fees and charges should be equitable, based on the true cost of services provided
and encourage waste avoidance and recycling.
2.5.1 Tasks
* Examine the present fees and charges as they relate to cost recovery and
equitability for the provision of the range of waste services.
* Examine the use of benefitted rates areas for providing an increased level of
service to specific locations/customers.
* Identify and assess options for alternative fees and charges structures, which
improve equitability across the NC population and promote waste avoidance and
recycling.
ao Themes for Options Development | Lloyd Consulting
Page 18 of 200See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.