Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

F0002-AA007595-AAR-10-SMP · MCU14/0102.05

Attached to the e-mail Revised Amendments to the SMP MCU14/102.05.

of 92

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (17.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

The Noosa Plan

Ircluding amendments to 16 September 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Controlling Factors de Stteh 2) Checking
e Clay loam 2
e _Claysoil 2
Anticipated duration of site disturbance: (see 2 below)
e Duration < 2 weeks 0
e 2weeks # Duration <3 months 2 7.
e 3months # Duration <6 months 4
e Duration > 6 months 5
Month that works are undertaken: (see 3 below)
e August, September 0
e April, May, June, July, November, October 1 E
e March December 2
e__ January February 3 _ -
Offsite sediment control (i.e. down slope of the soil
disturbance): |
e Score 1 point if there is no purpose built, operational |
and well maintained sediment traps (eg. sediment
basin, gross pollutant trap or purpose built wetland) QO
to catch sediment before it enters a water body with
environmental values (eg. creek, natural wetland,
river or bay) (see 4 below)
Run-off entering the site:
e Score 1 point if stormwater run off entering the site is 1 QO
not diverted away from the soil disturbance
Extent of site disturbance:
e Score 2 points if building work requires reshaping of
the ground surface (eg. ‘cut and fill’ works) (see 5 2 G
below)
e Score 5 points if the area to be disturbed is greater 5
than 600m?
Works within environmentally sensitive areas:
e Score 11 points if the disturbance is within the banks
of a watercourse (see 6 below) 11
e Score 5 points if the disturbance is within 50m of the
top of bank of a watercourse 5 O
e Score 2 points if the disturbance is between 50m
and 100m of the top of bank of a watercourse 2
TOTAL SCORE (See 7 & 8 below) | -

 

 

 

Notes:

 

1. Where there is more than one type of soil on the site, select the category with the highest point value.

2. The time, from when the building site will first become vulnerable to erosion, to the time the soil will
be fully stabilised (eg. grassing).

3. If this time span covers more than one category, select the category with the highest point value.
Note that if there is no grass/vegetation cover on the site before building work has started, the time
span starts from the time this form is completed.

4. If you are not sure, score 7 point.

5. For the purpose of this form, ‘cut and fill’ works are those that will result in a steep batter or retaining
wall above and/or below the building slab, greater than 1 metre in height. If the building slab has
already been fully cut and stabilised (eg. grassed) during the subdivision stage, score 0 points.

6. Watercourse means any clearly identifiable creek, stream or river, whether flowing permanently or
intermittently.

7. For a high risk site, the total score is > 14 points.

8. Fora lowrisk site, the total score is < 14 points.

$2.2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
17.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

F0002-AA007595-AAR-10-SMP.PDF · 17.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.