Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

M2677 - Response to further issues_08042021

of 9

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

BRISBANE | SUNSHINE COAST | CENTRAL QLD
KON-TIKI BUSINESS CENTRE
TOWER 1, LEVEL 2, SUITE T1.209,
55 PLAZA PARADE, MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558
JFP URBAN CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ABN 79 050 414 045




8 April 2021
Job Ref: M2677.

Noosa Council
By email: <[email protected]>



Att: Patrick Murphy – Unit Coordinator
Re: MCU20-0150 – Multiple dwelling units at 101- 105 Eumundi Noosa Rd Noosaville - Response to outstanding issues



Dear Patrick,

In response to your email dated 12 March 2021 and subsequent meeting on 22 March 2021, we have reviewed Council's
issues raised and provide the following response including plan amendments for Council's consideration in finalising the
assessment of the development application (MCU20/0150) at 101-105 Eumundi Noosa Rd Noosaville.

Council’s correspondence dated 12 March 2021 is reproduced below:

As discussed, the issues raised in the traffic review are:

     (i)      The proposed median in Eumundi Noosa Rd at the access driveway should be extended further north so that the
               end of the median is 5m north of the driveway, and “no u-turn” signage needs to be added to prohibit u-turns
               at both ends of the central median – this could be conditioned. [ISSUE 1]

     (ii)     The TTM report assesses carpark size requirements, but it is not clear how that is possible when there are no
               dimensions shown on the plans for any of the many multitude of columns located adjacent to parking
               spaces. Column sizes and their location relative to the ends of parking spaces needs to be added to the plans,
               and then TTM need to confirm that those elements are satisfactory. [ISSUE 2]

Furthermore, the amended plans provided with the Information Response have not satisfactorily addressed the design
concerns detailed in the Information Request. Included in these concerns are that the form of the building retains the
repetitive design elements which are contrary to the outcomes sought by the scheme, does not provide visual interest and
results in the appearance of excessive bulk. [ISSUE 3]

I am also concerned about the amenity impacts associated with the extent of fill, the location of the swimming pool and
the resultant opportunities for noise and privacy impacts on the adjoining residential properties to the east. [ISSUE 4]


ISSUE 1 - PROPOSED MEDIAN STRIP

The proposed median in Eumundi Noosa Rd at the access driveway should be extended further north so that the end of the
median is 5m north of the driveway, and “no u-turn” signage needs to be added to prohibit u-turns at both ends of the
central median – this could be conditioned.
Log in to download the original file

M2677 - Response to further issues_08042021.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.