Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

05. Hales - Planning Report · OPW20/0118

of 43

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

PROJECT URBAN – 20152                                                                             1 Jul 2020


Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                            Comments
Design, construction and safety – pontoons
                                    the extent it is more stringent than the
                                    standard mentioned in paragraph a).
18.6 Prescribed tidal works (s 5(2) outcome)                                   Not applicable.
that     are     a    pontoon The design and construction of the
permanently used for the pontoon is consistent with the following              The proposed structure is not a
fueling of, or the storage of standards:-                                      pontoon.
fuel for, vessels are designed (a) subject to paragraph (c), each of the
and constructed in a way to         following Australian Standards to the
ensure:-                            extent requirements stated in the
(a) the pontoon is able to          Standard apply to relevant loading
support its intended loads,         matters for the design or construction
having regard to its relevant       of the pontoon:-
loading matters; and                (i) AS/NZS 1170.0;
(b) the pontoon is safe for         (ii) AS/NZS 1170.1;
persons using the pontoon.          (iii) AS/NZS 1170.2;
                                    (iv) AS1170.4
                                    (v) AS 4997;
                                (b) Subject to paragraph (c), AS 3962 to
                                    the extent requirements stated in the
                                    Standard apply to a pontoon
                                    permanently used for the fueling of, or
                                    the storage of fuel;
                                (c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                    is more stringent than the standard
                                    mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) – the
                                    relevant planning scheme standard, to
                                    the extent it is more stringent than the
                                    standard mentioned in paragraph (a)
                                    or (b).

Performance Criteria             Acceptable Solution                           Comments
Design, construction and safety – revetments and seawalls
19.1 Prescribed tidal works (s 5(2) outcome)                                   Compliant.
that are a revetment or The design and construction of the
seawall are designed and revetment or seawall is consistent with the           The    engineer’s  certificate
constructed in a way to following standards:-                                  attached to the application
ensure it is able to support its a) subject to paragraph (c), each of the      confirms the design is in
intended      loads,    having      following Australian Standards to the      accordance with the relevant
regard to its relevant loading      extent requirements stated in the          standards.
matters and its intended            Standard apply to relevant loading
design life.                        matters for the design or construction
                                    of the revetment or seawall:-
                                    (i) AS/NZS 1170.0;
                                    (ii) AS/NZS 1170.1;
                                    (iii) AS/NZS 1170.2;
                                    (iv) AS1170.4

Development Assessment Report                                                                     Page 34 of 42
Operational Works
35 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

05. Hales - Planning Report.pdf · 2.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.