05. Hales - Planning Report · OPW20/0118

PROJECT URBAN – 20152                                                                               1 Jul 2020


Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                             Comments
Design, construction and safety – revetments and seawalls
erosion at the base of the (a) subject to paragraph (d), a revetment            is suitably designed for its
revetment or seawall.                or seawall provides for a sub-layer or     purpose.
                                     enough filter material to prevent
                                     erosion of the land under the
                                     revetment or seawall;
                                (b) subject to paragraph (d), the bottom
                                     edge of the base of a revetment or
                                     seawall will withstand undermining by
                                     scour;
                                c) subject to paragraph (d), AS 2758 to
                                     the extent requirements stated in the
                                     Standard apply to the sizing and
                                     grading of filter layers and armour
                                     materials;
                                d) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                     is more stringent than the standard in
                                     paragraph (a), (b) or (c) – the relevant
                                     planning scheme standard, to the
                                     extent it is more stringent than the
                                     standard in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).
19.4 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the                  Compliant
that are a revetment or revetment or seawall is consistent with the
seawall are not adversely following standards:-                                 The    engineer’s  certificate
affected   by     hydrostatic a) subject to paragraph (b), AS 4678 to           attached to the application
pressure.                            the extend requirements stated in the      confirms the design is in
                                     Standard apply to hydrostatic pressure     accordance with the relevant
                                     for earth-retaining structures;            standards.
                                b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                is more stringent than the standard in
                                paragraph (a) – the relevant planning
                                scheme standard, to the extent it is more
                                stringent than the standard in paragraph
                                (a).

Performance Criteria             Acceptable Solution                            Comments
Design, construction and safety – wharves
20.1 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the wharf is         Not applicable.
that are a wharf are designed consistent with the following standards:-
and constructed in a way to a) subject to paragraph (b):-                       The proposal is not a wharf.
ensure it is able to support its    i) for a wharf constructed within a
intended loads, having regard           marina – AS 3962 to the extent
to its relevant loading                 requirements stated in the
matters.                                Standard apply to relevant loading
                                        matters for the design or
                                        construction of the wharf; or


Development Assessment Report                                                                       Page 36 of 42
Operational Works
35 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567