Response to Information Request MCU16/0117 & OPW16/0212

Subject: MCU16/0117 & OPW16/0212 - Response to Information Request - 11 Opal St Cooroy
From: Marcus Brennan
Date: 2016-12-07T11:00:07+00:00
To: Mailbox Council Mail

MCU16/0117 & OPW16/0212 - Response to Information Request - 11 Opal St Cooroy

Dear Glen,

I refer to Council’s Information Request issued 31 October 2016 in relation to the above-mentioned application.

In accordance with s278 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, we herby provide a response to the request.
Don’t hesitate to contact me should you have any further queries.



Regards,


[cid:[email protected]]

[Attachment: Reponse to Information Request.pdf]
                                                                                     	
  

Date: 7 December 2016                                         Our Ref: DA16014
                                                              Council Ref:MCU16/0117

The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council,
PO BOX 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565

Attention: Glen Conforti
Via Email ([email protected])

Dear Glen,

RE:       Proposed Material Change of Use for Multiple Housing (Type 4
          Conventional) and associated Operational Works at 11 Opal Street,
          Cooroy described as Lot 1 on SP248165.

I refer to Council’s Information Request issued 31 October 2016 in relation to the
above-mentioned application.

In accordance with s278 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, we herby provide a
response to the item raised in the request. A detailed response to the issues raised is
outlined below:

Issue 1




Response

1.    Please refer to the attached architectural plans that provide further details
      about the height, size and design of each building. Two designs of been
      prepared and the design has been duplicated for each street frontage. As
      discussed on the telephone, should the building design slightly vary, depending
      on which removal houses become available, a ‘generally in accordance’
      request will be lodged seeking Council’s consent for the amended design.

2.    Given the proposed buildings occupy the same areas as what was indicated
      on the submitted landscape plan, it is considered that there is no need for an
      amended landscape plan to be prepared.


[OCR of page images]
Noosa Town Planning

Date: 7 December 2016 Our Ref: DA16014
Council Ref:MCU16/0117

The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council,

PO BOX 141

TEWANTIN QLD 4565

Attention: Glen Conforti
Via Email ([email protected])

Dear Glen,

RE: Proposed Material Change of Use for Multiple Housing (Type 4
Conventional) and associated Operational Works at 11 Opal Street,
Cooroy described as Lot 1 on $P248165.

| refer to Council's Information Request issued 31 October 2016 in relation to the
above-mentioned application.

In accordance with s278 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, we herby provide a
response to the item raised in the request. A detailed response to the issues raised is
outlined below:

Issue 1

Issue — Architectural Plans
No architectural plans have been provided. It is difficult to assess the application without an
indication of building size, design and other key Planning Scheme parameters.

Information Required

1 Please provide architectural plans for the development. Indicative plans (site plan,
upper and lower levels) would be acceptable providing they were sufficient to
assess the key Planning Scheme parameters. Council notes the logistics of using
removal houses.

2 Provide revised landscaping plans to reflect the architectural plans.

Response

1. Please refer to the attached architectural plans that provide further details
about the height, size and design of each building. Two designs of been
prepared and the design has been duplicated for each street frontage. As
discussed on the telephone, should the building design slightly vary, depending
on which removal houses become available, a ‘generally in accordance’
request will be lodged seeking Council's consent for the amended design.

2. Given the proposed buildings occupy the same areas as what was indicated
on the submitted landscape plan, it is considered that there is no need for an
amended landscape plan to be prepared.