Original source · versioned page text
Referral Agency Response - no requirements
Attached to the e-mail RAL20/0021 - SRA application correspondence - Referral agency response - no requirements.
RA9-N SARA reference: 2010-19147 SRA Council reference: RAL20/0021 Applicant reference: 20/5179 4 November 2020 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 [email protected] Attention: Glen Conforti Dear Mr Conforti SARA response—2 Pearsons Road, Cooroy (Referral agency response given under section 56 of the Planning Act 2016) The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 12 October 2020. Response Outcome: Referral agency response - no requirements Date of response: 4 November 2020 Advice: Advice to the applicant is in Attachment 1 Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 2 Development details Description: Development permit Reconfiguring a Lot – Residential (1 lot into 19 and park) SARA role: Referral Agency SARA trigger: Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 1, Item 1 (10.9.4.2.1.1)—Reconfiguring a lot within 25m of a state transport corridor (Planning Regulation 2017) Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 3, Item 1 (10.9.4.2.3.1)—Reconfiguring a lot within 100m of a state-controlled road intersection (Planning Regulation 2017) SARA reference: 2010-19147 SRA Assessment Manager: Noosa Shire Council South East Queensland (North) regional office Mike Ahern Building, Level 3, 12 First Avenue, Maroochydore Page 1 of 5 PO Box 1129, Maroochydore QLD 4558
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
2010-19147 SRA
Street address: 2 Pearsons Road, Cooroy
Real property description: Lot 3 on RP113733
Applicant name: Vantralia Pty Ltd C/- Max Watterson & Associates
Applicant contact details: PO Box 639
COOROY QLD 4563
[email protected]
Representations
An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is
decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (s. 30 Development Assessment
Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 3.
A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.
For further information please contact Javier Samanes, Senior Planning Officer, on (07) 4037 3237 or via
email [email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
Susan Kidd
Manager (Program Improvement)
cc Vantralia Pty Ltd C/- Max Watterson & Associates, [email protected]
enc Attachment 1 - Advice to the applicant
Attachment 2 - Reasons for referral agency response
Attachment 3 - Representations about a referral agency response provisions
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of 5
Page 3
2010-19147 SRA
Attachment 1—Advice to the applicant
General advice
1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016 its regulation or
the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP), version 2.6. If a word remains
undefined it has its ordinary meaning.
2. Public utility works and connection approval: The applicant is advised that if any works
and/or connections are required to public utility services within a state-controlled road reserve,
approval must be given by the Department of Transport and Main Roads under the relevant
public utility legislation (electricity, water/sewer, telecommunication), and in accordance with
the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ technical standards (TN163). Approvals must be
obtained prior to commencing any utility works within the state-controlled road reserve. Please
contact the public utility team via [email protected] for further information on the
application and approval process.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 5
Page 4
2010-19147 SRA
Attachment 2—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
The reasons for SARA’s decision are:
The development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of the
SDAP. Specifically, the development:
does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road
does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
road works
does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
roads and the surrounding road network
does not compromise the state’s ability to construct, or significantly increase the cost to construct
state-controlled roads and future state-controlled roads
does not compromise the state’s ability to maintain and operate state-controlled roads, or
significantly increase the cost to maintain and operate state-controlled roads
does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services
avoids significant adverse impacts resulting from environmental emissions generated by vehicles on
the state-controlled road.
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
the SDAP (version 2.6), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 5
Page 5
2010-19147 SRA Attachment 3—Representations about a referral agency reponse provisions (page left intentionally blank) State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 5