Referral Agency Response - no requirements

                                                                                               2010-19147 SRA




Attachment 2—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA’s decision are:
The development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of the
SDAP. Specifically, the development:

    does not create a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled road
    does not compromise the structural integrity of state-controlled roads, road transport infrastructure or
     road works
    does not result in a worsening of the physical condition or operating performance of state-controlled
     roads and the surrounding road network
    does not compromise the state’s ability to construct, or significantly increase the cost to construct
     state-controlled roads and future state-controlled roads
    does not compromise the state’s ability to maintain and operate state-controlled roads, or
     significantly increase the cost to maintain and operate state-controlled roads
    does not compromise the structural integrity of public passenger transport infrastructure or
     compromise the operating performance of public passenger transport services
    avoids significant adverse impacts resulting from environmental emissions generated by vehicles on
     the state-controlled road.

Material used in the assessment of the application:
    the development application material and submitted plans
    Planning Act 2016
    Planning Regulation 2017
    the SDAP (version 2.6), as published by SARA
    the Development Assessment Rules
    SARA DA Mapping system.




State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                                Page 4 of 5