Response with Conditions - 2301-32990 SRA

                                                                                               2301-32990 SRA




Attachment 3—Reasons for Referral Agency Response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
The development complies with State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment of
SDAP. Specifically, the development:
     does not increase the likelihood or frequency of accidents, fatalities or serious injury for users of a
      state-controlled road
     does not adversely impact the structural integrity or physical condition of state-controlled roads, road
      transport infrastructure, public passenger transport infrastructure or active transport infrastructure
     does not adversely impact the function and efficiency of state-controlled roads or future state-
      controlled roads
     does not adversely impact the state’s ability to plan, construct, maintain, upgrade or operate state-
      controlled roads, future state-controlled roads or road transport infrastructure
     does not significantly increase the cost to the state to plan, construct, upgrade or maintain state-
      controlled roads, future state-controlled roads or road transport infrastructure
     does not adversely impact the state’s ability to operate public passenger services on state-controlled
      roads.

Material used in the assessment of the application:
     the development application material and submitted plans
     Planning Act 2016
     Planning Regulation 2017
     SDAP (version 3.0), as published by SARA
     Development Assessment Rules
     SARA DA Mapping system
     State Planning Policy mapping system
     section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019.

Attachment 4—Representations about a Referral Agency Response
Provisions
(page left intentionally blank)




State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                               Page 5 of 6