Council archive · source document
MCU15/0122 - PM Submission Object - Erna De Bree & Brett Manton
i>
••'Ndos'A COUNCIL
•• Notice of Submission under the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
2015/16
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
1. be made to the assessment manager
2. be in writing
3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
6. ~be received by Council during the fonnal public notification peri'OJ"" -
As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, af! submissions, including individual details. are published on Council's website and
therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, imJspective of whether or not they are properly
made.
IFull name ofSubmitier E~Nn nE.._~~t.E.. 4- \?:,l<.~,...::I".
EmailAddress Lr.:.~~(.~Q., ~ 6rn .•, .• (.....9
.•
~
Postal address '(?,<J'x \ -
of' Co) nO.
Suburb 'CL~~'J-il.-' F .-;".--- '-_-/state ~~ Postcode ~,;SQ
Signature(s) -~--cS~~==="'='-=~=',- _
N.B. This loon has 00en designed for the ""nvenienee of lhe public. and any persons ~ 10 lodge a su!xn"",ion are nol obliged 10 use this foon.
I (if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)
.•".,to
D
r
Privacy
08 JlIl 2016
Council Will use any personal information provided for Ihe in'ended purpose Only and for remaining in ",,"lact with you. CouncB 15authorised 10",,11eet
I
this informalion in aCC<lrdaneewilh the Local Government Act 2009 and other local Government Acls. Your personal informalion is only accessed by
persons authorised 10do so. Your personal informallon is dealt wl'h inLCC<lrdance Wilh COUncil'sprivacy [email protected] 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantinaid 4565 ABN 97 969 214121
Page 1 of 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
,
••
FILENO MCU15/0122
PROPOSEDCOMMERCIAL BUSINESSTYPE2
MEDICAL AND RETAILBUSINESSTYPE2 - SHOP
Address: 52-58 Goodchap Street and 3-7 Val Crescent, Noosaville
Lots 6, 7, 8 & 9 RP138011 & Lots 13, 14 & 15 RP151414
Submission by 2 July 2016
Erna de Bree and Brett Manton
50 Goodchap St, Noosaville
We object to the above proposal for the following reasons:
There is already a medical centre and an emergency/outpatients service at the
hospital in Goodchap Street. We don't believe there is a need for another medical
centre in the same street, and in fact, we believe there are ample medical facilities
in Noosa in general, and there is no need for yet another one.
During the estimated 12 months of construction, we have concerns regarding the
following:
• The detrimental effect to our mental health due to continuous and loud noise.
• The effect the excavating, etc. particularly for the car park underneath would
have on the foundations of our property and structure.
• We have noted that our pets became very stressed and unsettled during the 2
weeks of roadworks on Goodchap St, so we expect the same and worse during
longer periods.
• The damage to our property and vehicles from dust during excavation and
construction.
Page 3
,
•
: The dust would prevent laundry to be hung outside, which would add to
electricity costs of using a dryer.
• Dust settling in our guttering and entering our water tank, affecting the water
quality.
• The effect the removal of the existing trees and greenery will impact on the
birdlife, of which there are many and varied, some that we have not seen
elsewhere, such as the scarlet honeyeater and the tawny grass bird.
Post construction, we have concerns regarding the following:
• Reduced quality of life - we chose this location for its lifestyle, environment,
bird life, and peacefulness.
• Our loss of privacy.
• The impact on the valuation of our property.
• Post construction there would be more traffic noise from vehicles entering and
exiting the proposed commercial premises, including cars completing direction
changes around the roundabout and echo noise from the car park.
• There are already many near misses and accidents at this intersection /
roundabout. We would fully expect this would increase with the addition of an
entry and exit so close to the roundabout, and of course, having this entry/exit
in Val Crescent is not an option whatsoever.
• Increased traffic in Val Crescent due to drivers missing the entry into the
premises and not realizing there is no entry via Val Crescent and it is a no
through road.
• The impact night/security lighting would have on our privacy/wellbeing.
Used in these records
MCU15/0122 - PM Submission Object - Erna De Bree & Brett MantonRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.