Council archive · source document
Appendix E - Bushfire Hazard Assessment · OPW19/0082
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW19/0082 - Application - DA Form 1 - Proposal Report - Civil & Landscaping Plans - 396 Lake Cooroibah Rd Coorooibah.
[10]
Inputs Outputs
Site slope 1° Viewfactor 0.5996, 0.4421, 0.2965, 0.2015, 0.1643 & 0.0452
Flame width 100 m Minimum distance to < 40 kW/m² 7.23 m
Windspeed n/a Minimum distance to < 29 kW/m² 9.90 m
Heat of combustion 18,600 kJ/kg Minimum distance to < 19 kW/m² 14.70 m
Flame temperature 1,090 K Minimum distance to < 12.5 kW/m² 21.3 m
Minimum distance to < 10 kW/m² 25.7 m
Rate of Spread - Mcarthur, 1973 & Noble et al., 1980
Flame length - NSW Rural Fire Service, 2001 & Noble et al., 1980
Elevation of receiver - Douglas & Tan, 2005
Flame angle - Douglas & Tan, 2005
Radiant heat flux - Drysdale, 1999, Sullivan et al., 2003, Douglas & Tan, 2005
8 In addition to the setback, the facility ought to have a building which is centrally located and available to any
residents to evacuate to should a fire threaten the area and where the opportunity for evacuation back to
Tewantin is not viable or a safe. This building should be large enough to house the maximum number of
guests for a short period of time, i.e. 1 hour and be connected to water and have access to toilet facilities
and first aid equipment.
Recommendations
Based on our findings above, we make the following recommendations: -
1 The road along the eastern side of the subject site within common property (Lot 0) is to remain and to continue
to provide access for Lot 1.
2 While the AS3959-2009 and Building Code of Australia does not include tents or temporary structures as
Class 1, 2, 3 or 10a or 10b and therefore no response to the Code is required. However, we recommend the
structures be set back from the wet and dry Melaleuca vegetation to west to achieve a Radiant heat flux of
29 kW/m2 as per Table 1 above, that being a setback of 10 metres (rounded up). Our reasoning for this is
that if these structures were Class 1 structures as defined under the BCA, the Qld State Planning Policy,
Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience has determined a structure exposed to a maximum Radiant heat flux
of 29 kW/m2 is an acceptable level of risk.
3 In addition, to further ensure and limit the spread of a ground fire and to reduce the radiant heat flux further
we also recommend that the area between the tenting structures and the western boundary be planted with
a range of Less flammable plant species particularly within the understorey.
4 Species appropriate for this location include (note this should not be viewed as a complete species list and
other species that may commonly occur within un-burnt eucalypt and Paperbark woodlands and open forest
may also be appropriate to use in this location and instance): -
Flindersia bennettiana
T1/T2 stratum Symplocos harroldii
Acronychia imperforata S1/S2/G1
Alphitonia excelsa
Alpinia caerulea
Cissus hypoglauca
Alyxia ruscifolia
Cryptocarya glaucescens
Carissa ovata
Cryptocarya laevis
Cordyline rubra
Cupaniopsis anacardioides
Smilax glyciphylla
Elaeocarpus obovatus
Trochocarpa laurina
Elaeocarpus reticulatus
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix E - Bushfire Hazard Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.4 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.