Council archive · source document
Urban Catalyst Response · RAL22/0021
Reference: 21-046 ABN: 74 622 643 421
Your ref: PO BOX 7044 SIPPY DOWNS QLD 4556
[email protected]
+61 412 788 532
28 November 2022
Jack Lewis
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
95/3 Hilton Tce
Noosaville QLD 4566
Dear Jack,
FURTHER ADVICE RESPONSE
39-41 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT, NOOSA HEADS
We refer to our recent conversation and Items 4 and 5 of Council’s further advice relating
to the proposed lot reconfiguration of land at 39-41 Picture Point Crescent. It remains
unclear why Council, through a bounded code assessment, has asked for extraneous
information through the assessment process that relates to previous clearing and bushfire
management provisions relating to the current residence.
Notwithstanding, we have previously considered the subject land in relation to bushfire
risks in terms of exposure for the existing residence present on the land and can confirm
as follows:
1. A Bushfire Hazard Assessment dated 5 April 2022 was prepared for the site and
included a Local Hazard Area Map using the SPP methodology. The vegetation hazard
class (VHC) 4.1 was applied to vegetation downslope. This is described in the Bushfire
Resilient Communities (QFES 2019) publication as notophyll and notophyll palm or
vine forest and is attributed a combined surface/near-surface fuel of 4.5t/ha and a
total potential fuel load of 5t/ha. A setback of 37.3m was calculated using FLAMESOL
given the steep grade to the west where the bushland is situated and in order to
reduce exposure of the existing residence to radiant heat energy less than 12.5kW/m2.
The existing residence was constructed prior to AS3959 commencing and therefore
the structure was unlikely to have been built to any specified BAL construction
standard.
2. An assessment was undertaken of clearing requirements permitted on the land is
response to bushfire management and confirmed that:
• Exempt clearing work described in Schedule 21 of the Planning Regulation 2017
states that clearing of native vegetation on freehold land is exempt if the clearing
Page 1 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
is for urban purposes in an urban area (Schedule 21, Part 2, Section 2(g)). As the
land is within an urban area, clearing of the mapped least concern regional
ecosystem in association with the residence is exempted development. Additional
exemptions also apply including those relevant to essential management which
includes clearing for bushfire management and these additional exemptions
enable clearing to occur without the need for State involvement with regard to
the Vegetation Management Act 1999.
• To the extent the development is considered to be exempted development,
interfering with koala habitat within a mapped core koala habitat area is not
considered assessable development. The term exempted development is defined
in Schedule 24 of the Planning Regulation 2017 and includes (k) a total area on
the premises of 500m2 or less of 1 or more koala habitat areas being cleared of
native vegetation since 7 February 2020 and (n) development that is or involves
operational work that is the clearing of native vegetation in a koala habitat area if
the clearing— (vii) is necessary for essential management and is qualifying
clearing. The definition of essential management provided in Schedule 24 of the
Planning Regulation 2017 includes clearing native vegetation for a number of
management initiatives, the most relevant being (a) for establishing or
maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure, other than a fence,
road or vehicular track, if the maximum width of the firebreak is equal to 1.5 times
the height of the tallest vegetation next to the infrastructure, or 20m, whichever is
the wider.
• Section 50 of the Nature Conservation (Protected Plants) Regulation 2020 includes
an exemption for the taking of protected plants as a result of establishing or
maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure, other than a fence,
road or vehicular track, if the maximum width of the firebreak is equal to the wider
of the following — 1.5 times the height of the tallest vegetation next to the
infrastructure or 20m.
• Schedule 6 of the Planning Regulation 2017 sets out matters which are not able
to be regulated by a local categorising instrument (the Noosa Plan 2020 is an
example of a local categorising instrument) and this includes the following
detailed under Section 20A of Schedule 6: Operational work that is clearing native
vegetation if—
(a) the clearing is necessary for—
(i) establishing or maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure,
other than a fence, road or vehicular track, and the maximum width of the
firebreak is equal to 1.5 times the height of the tallest vegetation next to
the infrastructure, or 20m, whichever is the wider; or
(ii) establishing a necessary fire management line, and the maximum width of
the clearing for the fire management line is 10m; and
(b) the clearing—
(i) is on freehold land.
On the basis of the above, the bushfire hazard assessment drafted for the existing
residence confirmed that a bushfire risk was present and that given the age of the existing
Page 2 of 3
Page 3
premises, a setback calculated to minimise exposure could be implemented as a
management strategy to mitigate risk. Clearing associated with clearing for bushfire is
benefitted by a number of exemptions under the legislation, including the provisions of
the Noosa Plan 2020 that relate to tree clearing.
We trust this information is of assistance in clarifying our previous involvement with
regard to the existing dwelling. The documentation prepared may not directly apply to
the subdivision, but we would be happy to answer any queries you may have in relation
to this matter. I am contactable via email ([email protected]) or phone on
+61 412 788 532 should you require any further clarification.
Yours faithfully,
Daniel Willis
Urban Catalyst 3 Pty Ltd
Director
Page 3 of 3
Used in these records
Urban Catalyst Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 220 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.