Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Urban Catalyst Response · RAL22/0021

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Reference: 21-046                                                            ABN: 74 622 643 421

Your ref:                                                    PO BOX 7044 SIPPY DOWNS QLD 4556
                                                                       [email protected]
                                                                                 +61 412 788 532
28 November 2022



Jack Lewis
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
95/3 Hilton Tce
Noosaville QLD 4566

Dear Jack,

                           FURTHER ADVICE RESPONSE
                  39-41 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT, NOOSA HEADS

We refer to our recent conversation and Items 4 and 5 of Council’s further advice relating
to the proposed lot reconfiguration of land at 39-41 Picture Point Crescent. It remains
unclear why Council, through a bounded code assessment, has asked for extraneous
information through the assessment process that relates to previous clearing and bushfire
management provisions relating to the current residence.

Notwithstanding, we have previously considered the subject land in relation to bushfire
risks in terms of exposure for the existing residence present on the land and can confirm
as follows:

1. A Bushfire Hazard Assessment dated 5 April 2022 was prepared for the site and
   included a Local Hazard Area Map using the SPP methodology. The vegetation hazard
   class (VHC) 4.1 was applied to vegetation downslope. This is described in the Bushfire
   Resilient Communities (QFES 2019) publication as notophyll and notophyll palm or
   vine forest and is attributed a combined surface/near-surface fuel of 4.5t/ha and a
   total potential fuel load of 5t/ha. A setback of 37.3m was calculated using FLAMESOL
   given the steep grade to the west where the bushland is situated and in order to
   reduce exposure of the existing residence to radiant heat energy less than 12.5kW/m2.
   The existing residence was constructed prior to AS3959 commencing and therefore
   the structure was unlikely to have been built to any specified BAL construction
   standard.

2. An assessment was undertaken of clearing requirements permitted on the land is
   response to bushfire management and confirmed that:
   • Exempt clearing work described in Schedule 21 of the Planning Regulation 2017
      states that clearing of native vegetation on freehold land is exempt if the clearing



                                      Page 1 of 3
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

       is for urban purposes in an urban area (Schedule 21, Part 2, Section 2(g)). As the
       land is within an urban area, clearing of the mapped least concern regional
       ecosystem in association with the residence is exempted development. Additional
       exemptions also apply including those relevant to essential management which
       includes clearing for bushfire management and these additional exemptions
       enable clearing to occur without the need for State involvement with regard to
       the Vegetation Management Act 1999.
   •   To the extent the development is considered to be exempted development,
       interfering with koala habitat within a mapped core koala habitat area is not
       considered assessable development. The term exempted development is defined
       in Schedule 24 of the Planning Regulation 2017 and includes (k) a total area on
       the premises of 500m2 or less of 1 or more koala habitat areas being cleared of
       native vegetation since 7 February 2020 and (n) development that is or involves
       operational work that is the clearing of native vegetation in a koala habitat area if
       the clearing— (vii) is necessary for essential management and is qualifying
       clearing. The definition of essential management provided in Schedule 24 of the
       Planning Regulation 2017 includes clearing native vegetation for a number of
       management initiatives, the most relevant being (a) for establishing or
       maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure, other than a fence,
       road or vehicular track, if the maximum width of the firebreak is equal to 1.5 times
       the height of the tallest vegetation next to the infrastructure, or 20m, whichever is
       the wider.
   •   Section 50 of the Nature Conservation (Protected Plants) Regulation 2020 includes
       an exemption for the taking of protected plants as a result of establishing or
       maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure, other than a fence,
       road or vehicular track, if the maximum width of the firebreak is equal to the wider
       of the following — 1.5 times the height of the tallest vegetation next to the
       infrastructure or 20m.
   •   Schedule 6 of the Planning Regulation 2017 sets out matters which are not able
       to be regulated by a local categorising instrument (the Noosa Plan 2020 is an
       example of a local categorising instrument) and this includes the following
       detailed under Section 20A of Schedule 6: Operational work that is clearing native
       vegetation if—
       (a) the clearing is necessary for—
            (i) establishing or maintaining a necessary firebreak to protect infrastructure,
                 other than a fence, road or vehicular track, and the maximum width of the
                 firebreak is equal to 1.5 times the height of the tallest vegetation next to
                 the infrastructure, or 20m, whichever is the wider; or
            (ii) establishing a necessary fire management line, and the maximum width of
                 the clearing for the fire management line is 10m; and
       (b) the clearing—
            (i) is on freehold land.

On the basis of the above, the bushfire hazard assessment drafted for the existing
residence confirmed that a bushfire risk was present and that given the age of the existing



                                       Page 2 of 3

Page 3

premises, a setback calculated to minimise exposure could be implemented as a
management strategy to mitigate risk. Clearing associated with clearing for bushfire is
benefitted by a number of exemptions under the legislation, including the provisions of
the Noosa Plan 2020 that relate to tree clearing.

We trust this information is of assistance in clarifying our previous involvement with
regard to the existing dwelling. The documentation prepared may not directly apply to
the subdivision, but we would be happy to answer any queries you may have in relation
to this matter. I am contactable via email ([email protected]) or phone on
+61 412 788 532 should you require any further clarification.


Yours faithfully,



Daniel Willis
Urban Catalyst 3 Pty Ltd
Director




                                     Page 3 of 3

Used in these records

About this file

File size
220 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Urban Catalyst Response.pdf · 220 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.