RAL Report

All proposed Lots contain an area and a frontage that comply with the prescribed minimums
for Lots in the relevant zone.

With respect to Performance Outcome 8 the lot design maximises the number of lots where
the longest axis of the lots has an east-west orientation. The width of the parent allotment
does not provide an opportunity to create all lots with a long east-west orientation and an
access road. The proposed lot layout is consistent with the prevailing urban development
pattern of the local area.

5.5 Works Code

The reconfiguration complies with the Works Codes. Please refer to the attached preliminary
Operational Works Plans within the Integrated Water Management Plan.

5.6 Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Code
The development complies with the relevant provisions of the Biodiversity, Waterways and
Wetlands overlay code. The lot layout places all proposed lots outside of the riparian buffer

area and the waterway.

The proposal minimizes vegetation clearing and provides an opportunity to rehabilitate the
native vegetation located within the overlay area.

The development is integrated with the previous development of the adjoining properties and
will provide a connectivity of the adjacent riparian areas.

5.7 Flood Hazard Overlay Code

The development complies with the relevant provisions of the Flood Hazard overlay code.
The lot layout places all proposed lots outside of the flood hazard area and a minimum of 1.5

metre freeboard above the 100-year flood event.

The flood study prepared by Callaghan & Toth (attached in Appendix C) concludes that the
development will have no impact upon the floodway storage.

6. STATE PLANNING INTERESTS
6.1 State Planning Regulatory Provisions

The site is included within the SEQ Regional Plan State Planning Regulatory Provisions —
Land Use Category of Urban Footprint; the proposal is consistent with the Regional Plan.

6.2 Referral and State Development Assessment Provisions

A portion of the subject land is mapped as being affected by frontage to a State-controlled
Road and an area with 25 metres of a State-controlled road; therefore, it is considered that
the application will require referral to SARA as a concurrence agency.

The proposal does not include any additional accesses onto a State-controlled road and does
not include any additional Lots within 25 metres of a State-controlled road.