Information Request MCU23 0090

Information Required
30.   Provide amended plans reducing the scale of the development and/or increasing onsite
      carparking (refer to Issue – Scale of Development for further details).
31.   Provide an amended Traffic Impact Assessment that provides sufficient justification for
      any proposed carparking relaxation for the amended development required above. The
      amended Traffic Impact Assessment must be endorsed by a suitably qualified person
      (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland) and include the necessary
      information to address Council’s concerns.


Issue – Vehicle Swept Paths
Red’s Proposed Site Plan (TP06, Rev. 4) does not demonstrate the reversing manoeuvre of
the HRV back into the Arcade.
The Vehicle Swept Paths for the HRV and Side Loading Refuse Vehicle includes sections
where the wheel path of these vehicles mounts the pedestrian islands in the proposed carpark.
See the highlighted areas below.




Information Required
32.   Provide amended Vehicle Swept Paths demonstrating the necessary vehicles can
      manoeuvre the site without failure. The amended plans must be prepared by a suitably
      qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland) and
      include, but not be limited to:
      a. Demonstrate a HRV can reverse into the existing arcade; and
      b. Demonstrate a HRV and Side Loading Refuse Vehicle can manoeuvre the site
         without failure (mounting road furniture, etc.).


Issue – PWD Carparks
There is an opportunity to relocate the proposed DDA car space highlighted above to improve
pedestrian safety for those that utilise this space when accessing the hotel and other tenancies
that front the carpark.




                                                                                      Page 13 of 18