Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report 51991.438.01 (As Published)
4. Evidence indicates that late-night patron-related incidents persist, particularly between
midnight and 4:00 am, and would likely intensify if the condition were removed, contrary to
PO2 and PO11 of the Entertainment Activities Code, which require uses to be of an
appropriate intensity and effectively managed to avoid adverse impacts.
5. The applicant has not demonstrated that alternative measures would provide an equivalent
or enforceable level of impact management or achieve the approved amenity outcomes, as
required to meet PO11 and PO12 of the Entertainment Activities Code (management of
impacts and hours of operation).
6. The proposed change is contrary to the public interest, as it would increase reliance on
external agencies and diminish safety, amenity and public realm quality, inconsistent with:
a. Overall Outcomes (2)(l), (u) and (z) of the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code, which require
a safe, vibrant, pedestrian-friendly environment with high amenity; and
b. Entertainment Activities Code overall outcomes, which require a safe and secure
environment for patrons and the community.
7. The change is inconsistent with the planning scheme, including:
a. PO2 and PO3 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code, requiring non-residential
uses to be compatible with and ancillary to accommodation and not compromise
amenity or the function of the zone;
b. PO2, PO12 and PO14 of the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code, which require
development to contribute to local amenity, maintain Hastings Street as a high-amenity
visitor destination and reinforce its pedestrian-focused character; and
c. PO2 and PO4 of the Entertainment Activities Code, requiring entertainment uses to be
compatible with locality character and avoid adverse impacts.
8. Removing Condition 8 would reduce the ability to manage off-site behavioural impacts,
increase the likelihood of disturbance incompatible with surrounding sensitive uses, and
contribute to cumulative late-night impacts, contrary to Overall Outcomes (2)(c) and PO2 of
the Entertainment Activities Code, which require consideration of cumulative impacts and
suitability of scale and intensity.
9. The change does not demonstrate compliance with Performance Outcomes requiring that:
a. Uses coexist without adverse amenity impacts, contrary to Overall Outcome (2)(i) of
the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code; and
b. Development contributes to and protects local amenity, contrary to PO2 and PO8 of
the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code.
10. The removal of Condition 8 undermines the proactive and comprehensive management of
operational impacts required by the planning scheme, and is inconsistent with:
a. PO11 of the Entertainment Activities Code, requiring an operational management
framework addressing patron behaviour, crowd control and safety; and
b. PO11 and PO27 of the Noosa Heads Local Plan Code, which seek to maintain a high-
quality, pedestrian-oriented public realm and avoid adverse amenity impacts within the
Hastings Street precinct.
Page 6 of 6
Document Set ID: 24665366
Version: 9, Version Date: 25/05/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report 51991.438.01 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.5 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.