Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Approved Document Bushfire Hazard and Mitigation Plan 25 02 2025 MCU21/0110 - Negotiated

of 39
                                                                                                       13




DISCUSSION
Further to our findings above and based on the vegetation types, and consequently the
Vegetation Hazard Classes, as described by Leonard et al (2014),1 we have formed the view
that: -

1. With respect to the vegetation in the northern portion and north-eastern boundary of the
   subject site, based on the Standard Bushfire Hazard mapping methodology2, the area
   presents as a High potential bushfire intensity:
   a. The site inspection confirmed the area’s proximity to the significant patch of
      vegetation to the north and east (Girraween Nature Refuge). The area has similar
      vegetation to that observed in the Girraween Nature Refuge although is more
      disturbed, having a presence of weeds and lack of a prominent shrub layer/wallum
      understorey.
   b. The area is separated from vegetation to the north and east by Resort Drive.
   c. We understand some of this vegetation will be cleared for the construction of the new
      tennis courts and parking facilities, or where landscapes will be managed in a low fuel
      state.
   d. We note this is analogous to both the SPP mapping and Noosa Plan mapping.
   e. Table 1 below provides the derived Potential bushfire intensity level using the
      methodology after Leonard et al (2014) and as contained in the State Planning Policy
      – Natural Hazards, Risks and Resilience – Technical Manual – A fit for Purpose
      approach in undertaking natural hazard studies and risk assessment (April 2016).

Table 1 - Fireline Intensity Model Data for vegetation in the northern portion and
north-eastern boundary of the subject site

              Characteristic                                         Input/output value
 Vegetation hazard class                                9.1 Moist to dry eucalypt open forests on
                                                        coastal lowlands and ranges
 Potential fuel load (t/ha)                             24.1 t/ha
 FFDI                                                   55
 Slope (degrees)                                        6.8 degrees
 Potential fireline intensity (kW/m)                    32,104 kw/m
 Potential Bushfire Hazard Class                        High

   i.     The VHC 9.1 – moist to dry eucalypt open forests on coastal lowlands and ranges
          has been used based on the RE mapping and species observed during the site
          inspection.
   ii.    The Potential fuel load is attributed with a potential fuel load by the State
          Government after Leonard et al. (2014).




1 Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K., and Blanchi, R. (2014) A new methodology for state-wide mapping of

bushfire prone areas in Queensland. CSIRO, Australia.
2 DILGP, 2016. State Planning Policy – Technical Manual- A ‘fit for purpose’ approach in undertaking

natural hazard studies and risk assessments, DILGP.

         RF17-040 – Boutique Hotel – Noosa Springs – Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd                                                       25th of February 2025

Log in to download the original (Approved Document Bushfire Hazard and Mitigation Plan 25 02 2025 MCU21_0110 - Negotiated.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.