Original source · versioned page text
Approved Document Bushfire Hazard and Mitigation Plan 25 02 2025 MCU21/0110 - Negotiated
13
DISCUSSION
Further to our findings above and based on the vegetation types, and consequently the
Vegetation Hazard Classes, as described by Leonard et al (2014),1 we have formed the view
that: -
1. With respect to the vegetation in the northern portion and north-eastern boundary of the
subject site, based on the Standard Bushfire Hazard mapping methodology2, the area
presents as a High potential bushfire intensity:
a. The site inspection confirmed the area’s proximity to the significant patch of
vegetation to the north and east (Girraween Nature Refuge). The area has similar
vegetation to that observed in the Girraween Nature Refuge although is more
disturbed, having a presence of weeds and lack of a prominent shrub layer/wallum
understorey.
b. The area is separated from vegetation to the north and east by Resort Drive.
c. We understand some of this vegetation will be cleared for the construction of the new
tennis courts and parking facilities, or where landscapes will be managed in a low fuel
state.
d. We note this is analogous to both the SPP mapping and Noosa Plan mapping.
e. Table 1 below provides the derived Potential bushfire intensity level using the
methodology after Leonard et al (2014) and as contained in the State Planning Policy
– Natural Hazards, Risks and Resilience – Technical Manual – A fit for Purpose
approach in undertaking natural hazard studies and risk assessment (April 2016).
Table 1 - Fireline Intensity Model Data for vegetation in the northern portion and
north-eastern boundary of the subject site
Characteristic Input/output value
Vegetation hazard class 9.1 Moist to dry eucalypt open forests on
coastal lowlands and ranges
Potential fuel load (t/ha) 24.1 t/ha
FFDI 55
Slope (degrees) 6.8 degrees
Potential fireline intensity (kW/m) 32,104 kw/m
Potential Bushfire Hazard Class High
i. The VHC 9.1 – moist to dry eucalypt open forests on coastal lowlands and ranges
has been used based on the RE mapping and species observed during the site
inspection.
ii. The Potential fuel load is attributed with a potential fuel load by the State
Government after Leonard et al. (2014).
1 Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K., and Blanchi, R. (2014) A new methodology for state-wide mapping of
bushfire prone areas in Queensland. CSIRO, Australia.
2 DILGP, 2016. State Planning Policy – Technical Manual- A ‘fit for purpose’ approach in undertaking
natural hazard studies and risk assessments, DILGP.
RF17-040 – Boutique Hotel – Noosa Springs – Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd 25th of February 2025
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.