Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 10, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
preserving the environmental balance of the region. Rezoning to a residential area could disrupt this It should be noted that the Medium Density Residential Zone has a maximum building height of 8 metres ▪ all proposed amendments
delicate ecological balance and lead to irreversible damage. and 2 storeys. Maximum site cover is generally 40% and maximum plot ratio 0.4:1. None of these exceed referencing the site be reverted
The proposed rezoning would negatively impact the views from existing residences in the area. Many the current allowance. to existing wording.
residents currently enjoy scenic views of the untouched natural surroundings. Changing the landscape Notwithstanding the above, in response to other submissions regarding the proposed amendments, it is
to accommodate medium density residential buildings would not only ruin these views but also detract recommended the site remain in its current Tourist Accommodation zone for the reasons outlined in the
from the peaceful ambiance that drew us to live here in the first place. submission below.
It is important to consider whether there are alternative locations available for residential development.
Rezoning the resort area may not be the only option for meeting housing demands in the area. Exploring
other free areas that are not as ecologically sensitive and that are already vacant could be a more viable
solution that satisfies both housing needs and environmental protection. In addition, the resort is
currently operating successfully as is the infrastructure around the resort. If this was to change the traffic
in the area would dramatically increase causing further distress to existing residence.
2307487 Noosa Lakes Resort was built as motel style accommodation for tourists. The landscaping and building 3 Hilton Terrace, Tewantin - Noosa Lakes Resort was rezoned to Special Facilities (Integrated Residential
and forms suit this kind of use. All the ‘units’ share 3 pools on site. Pools, buildings, and all garden areas Development and Ancillary Facility) in 1997. A Town Planning Consent Permit was issued on 4 March 1998
23109090 are managed by the resort manager employed by the body corporate. and amended on 8 April 1998. The permit was for resort, indoor entertainment/function room (conference
and There are 95 ‘units’ in the resort. 1 of these is a commercial/retail building. The other 94 are units which centre) and ancillary facilities (multiple dwelling of 94 units and accommodation building of 94 units).
23074878 are split horizontally to accommodate tourists and short stays in three ways, downstairs or upstairs or Each of the 94 rateable residential properties consists of a dual key unit with a 1 bedroom unit upstairs and
5774350 both together. Each unit can accommodate two stays and so the overall maximum accommodation a downstairs motel style studio. Therefore, accommodation offered by the resort could be either
Noosa Lakes Resort can provide is 188. ▪ a motel style studio
23080104 Half of the accommodation in each of the 94 units can also facilitate permanent residents as each ▪ a 1 bedroom self-contained apartment or,
23089120 upstairs has a full kitchen. Each downstairs cannot be used in this way as there is no kitchen and no
fire separation between upstairs and downstairs. The units were not built to allow for living downstairs. ▪ in combination, a 2 bedroom self-contained townhouse
23095560 So as permanent residences there are only 94 possibilities. The ground floor accommodation units are not self-contained dwellings as per the definition in the Planning
23108806 Both upstairs and downstairs share a combined laundry area and entrance way. Car parking is by Regulation 2017 or NP2020. In isolation the downstairs studio units have no facilities for washing clothes
carport in front of property. and no food preparation facilities. Further, given there is no fire separation between the lower level studio
23109473 and the balance of the unit, installation of kitchen facilities in the ground floor units is a development offence.
There is no private land for residents use that is accessible from the living areas, or able to be used as In February 2014 there was a specific Court order reiterating this.
23095558 private garden.
There are a wide range of cafes, takeaways and restaurants within 200 metres of the site, hence visitors
23108862 Currently the Resort has a mix of users: permanent residents (owners or long-term tenant), tourist are well catered for however this is unlikely to be sustainable for permanent residents.
accommodation via the resort management, and short stay accommodation via short stay platforms like
23108803 AirBnB. The extensive resort pools, shared recreation amenities and tropical landscaping influence the body
corporate fees and affect the affordability of the complex. Dwellings lack private open space other than their
23108804 Many of the owners live upstairs and holiday let out the downstairs studio unit, however from a Noosa balconies.
Council Rates perspective the Lot would be Principal Place of Residence.
23109478 It is noted that at times the lower level studios have been occupied by longer term tenants or by owners,
54% are holiday let, leaving 46% as permanent. However this figure of 46% could be lower as some of however they are not lawful dwellings on their own. Council should not be seen as encouraging permanent
23110730 the units are not under resort management or knowledge, and we believe are being holiday let as well. occupation in contravention of the court order.
If rezoned to Medium Density the number of residences that may be available are 94 – as each unit can While the Noosa Plan 2006 included Noosa Lakes Resort in the Attached Housing zone, NP2006 Multiple
23109306
only be used as one residence (upstairs and downstairs combined). So we are halving the potential Housing was specifically inconsistent on this site whereas Visitor accommodation was specifically
23108858 number of residences that can be accommodated by this site. To create the same number of 188 consistent. The NP2006 stated “Substantial resort sites are protected for Visitor accommodation Type 4
possible accommodations - each owner would have to, at considerable expense, modify their unit to including Noosa Lakes Resort, 1-3 Hilton Terrace on Plans SP115731, SP115743 and SP118002.”
23109609 allow for separate residences by fire separating the upstairs and downstairs, incorporating laundry
facilities to each floor and any other modifications needed. Not a likely scenario that all 94 owners would During the 2016-2018 planning scheme review, sites that were approved for visitor accommodation only
23109290 were proposed to be included in the Tourist Accommodation zone. The 2017 Housing Needs Assessment
and or could do.
investigated the issue of permanent residents living within established resorts and spoke to the operator of
23109186 The zone change by Council not considering the previous 30 years of this site (was a motel before Noosa Lakes Resort. It was indicated that of the total 188 units, approximately half were occupied by
Noosa Lakes Resort) essentially dooms the site to forever remain without any redevelopment or permanent residents and half were available in the holiday letting pool. Council considered Noosa Lakes
23109018 improvement as there is no benefit of redevelopment to a unit owner who has their investment for holiday Resort at length because it was such a mix of visitor and resident accommodation. At the time there was
23109125 purposes if it is rebuilt as a site for permanent occupation. Redevelopment of a strata scheme requires an onsite conference/convention centre reliant on a quantum of visitor accommodation; it has since been
almost 100% approval from all Owners to redevelop a site. At least under the previous zoning there was converted to a restaurant, surf museum, rehabilitation clinic and commercial offices.
23108800 a multi-purpose ability for the scheme.
Several submissions were received from residents objecting to its inclusion in the Tourist Accommodation
23121621 With 95 owners within Noosa Lakes Resort it is extremely unlikely that all or even a majority of owners Zone during 2019 consultation period however Council decided on weight to included it in the tourist
would agree to a complete redevelopment of the site. Each owner can improve the interiors of their unit Accommodation zone, because not only was it designed as visitor accommodation rather than housing, but
23147351 gradually but not renovate the exterior. Just renovation of each unit is not going to meet Medium Density it was offering shorter term accommodation for tourists and itinerant workers at a different location and
criteria. Only if there was a catastrophic event and the resort was beyond repair and needing to be different price point to much of the balance of the accommodation market.
23109088 rebuilt could the option of creating medium density housing exist. But could the same number of 188
residences be accommodated on the site for the same cost that insurance currently covers the units? Aside from two tourist parks and limited rooms at the Royal Mail this is the only purpose-built visitor
23109191 accommodation in Tewantin. It is on a bus stop and provides convenient access to the river ferry via which
The permanent occupation of the Studio units as a separate occupancy to the upstairs unit is not guests can access more congested parts of the coast.
23109115
permitted. Any reference to affordability of Noosa Lakes is generally due to unit owners having disregard
to this ruling and renting their Studio apartment on a permanent basis. This has been occurring at the Despite Noosa Lakes Resort having a high number of permanent residents, the complexity of the
23098907 development approval and dwelling unit configuration, which includes both permanent dwellings plus a
and site for many years. If Council enforced the ruling about permanent occupation of the Studio unit then
the short term letting proportion would be higher. short term rooming accommodation unit that cannot be permanent occupied, and the fact the site is unlikely
23109610 to redevelop in the short term, makes it reasonable to retain the site in its current Tourist Accommodation
What processes are in place to enforce this ruling as the number of short stay let units at the Resort zone.
23098887
would change dramatically if in fact the rules were being enforced and therefore the rationale around
number of permanent occupants at the Resort changes the argument. It is therefore recommended Noosa Lakes remain in the Tourist Accommodation zone and owners continue
23109496
to live in or let out their units as they can as per their existing use rights.
5808117 23109016
8
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.