Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 110, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Bruce and Danielle Bairstow provided me with an affordable housing option, compared to the exorbitant
prices in the current rental market. They gave us a chance to find our feet. They are helpful and
compassionate and have a genuine care for their community and Noosa region.
With their help, we have a roof over our head and are blessed to able to live in a lovely coastal community
location, abundant with opportunities, and walking distance to everything we need. It’s made such a
difference to our lives, and we’ll be forever grateful.
I am sure that if the site could be rezoned to allow for affordable housing to be built there it would be a
great benefit to many others in the community in situations like me.
5808412 I support the Council’s new Doonella Street Precinct and further, I support the proposal for the Council to
expand the new Doonella St Precinct to include the Old Tewantin Police Station Site and police houses
5808755 (10 Sidoni St and 87 Poinciana Av)
I do not consider that this would be a substantial change of use to what is there on the site currently
(offices and housing) which is an eyesore.
A larger Doonella St Precinct creates the opportunity for a substantial increase in smaller, more affordable
housing which we desperately need, in an area where such a development doesn’t impact the wider
community.
It just makes sense to use the corner site for high density accommodation "
5750190 Complete the next stage of Beckmans Road bypass and allow more dwellings to be built on Beckmans The Beckman’s Road bypass is a state road link identified in Council’s current LGIP. Officers continue to That no change be made to
Road properties that are currently zoned as Rural residential. Close to schools, shops, transport etc. advocate for the construction of this road by the State and support its construction. proposed amendments as a
When this road is constructed, consideration could be given in the future to the hierarchy of Beckman’s result of this submission.
Road. Future consideration may be given to the review of the Rural Residential zoning
23101845 Tewantin has many properties that have important heritage considerations and the proposed restrictive While Tewantin has many character buildings there are not many that meet the criteria for heritage listing That no change be made to
approach will further reduce and eliminate its character and charm. The principle of locality specific and streets and neighbourhoods have been substantially modified leaving no specific areas intact that proposed amendments as a
approaches should come into play, particularly in Tewantin enabling planners to accept adaptations that would justify inclusion in a character area. The oldest parts of Tewantin are also those closest to the town result of this submission.
reflect the unique character of its early heritage. centre, transport, employment, the primary school etc where additional housing makes the most sense.
Many houses were built on double blocks (two separate titles) and it is not reasonable to prevent property
owners from replacing an aging house with two modern houses. Good quality, well maintained character
buildings such as original Queenslanders are generally valued and often renovated. However, this comes
at a high cost to the owner, and it is not always practical if the land has been zoned for higher density
development for some time.
5820076 Facilitating an integrated health and wellbeing precinct within the Noosa District Sports Complex;” is Submitters concerns are noted. It is not the intention that medical or allied health clinics congregate in That no change be made to
mentioned on the summary page. I’ve opened all the fact sheets and can find any helpful information the sports centre. Rather that there will be a multi-purpose space where professionals in the areas of proposed amendments as a
without success. The sports field should be left for community sports and not for healthcare. Once sports medicine and rehabilitation can complement sports and recreation occurring on the site. The use result of this submission
buildings are constructed there is no going back. There is plentiful health care hubs in goodchap street of an office will be subject to impact assessment and therefore public notification and is only consistent
and in the new Noosa civic construction s so we do not need to steal public and shared outdoor space for where directly associated with the delivery of sport or recreation programs or activities by or on behalf of
these services. It is taking resources for the future youth and generations. I strongly object to changes. council or another level of government.
5818217 23121619 Facilitating an integrated health and wellbeing precinct within the Noosa District Sports Complex - If this It is not the intention that this site accommodate additional GPs and it is unlikely to contribute to mental That no change be made to
means putting in more doctors surgeries anything to do with health is a good thing ,as most of the doctor health services. Medical professionals are likely to be directly related to sports medicine and physical proposed amendments as a
surgeries books are full and with the elderly numbers increasing, I think anything to do with well-being is rehabilitation. result of this submission
a positive. I think we could also benefit from more mental health initiatives.
23108518 The submission relates to land owned by NoosaCare at 4 - 14 Carramar Street and under contract by The submission is acknowledged, and the intention of NoosaCare to broaden their accommodation That no change be made to
NoosaCare at 16 & 18 Carramar Street, Tewantin and which adjoins the existing Carramar aged care offering to include staff accommodation and aging in place options which is generally supported. 4-10 proposed amendments as a
facility. While not currently under the control of NoosaCare, 2 Carramar Street is also being pursued as Carramar Street are already in the Community Facilities Zone, and at this stage are annotated for result of this submission
part of the NoosaCare proposal. Residential Care, meaning the use of residential care would be code assessable but the use of retirement
NoosaCare have identified the need for retirement housing and affordable worker accommodation to facility would need to go through impact assessment, noting that Council has the ability to reduce
support and complement the existing Carramar aged care facility. This strategy is critical to ensuring the development application fees for not-for-profit applicants if appropriate.
long term sustainability of NoosaCare and the services they provide. Accommodation that is exclusively for staff of the care facility would be considered ancillary to the use
The current Carramar facility at 186 Cooroy Noosa Road is however at capacity, with the site’s and therefore also code assessable.
development footprint fully established and unable to accommodate further expansion. In order to The proposed amendments sought to make the use of multiple dwellings code assessable if exclusively
accommodate retirement housing and affordable worker accommodation, use of the Carramar Street affordable rental premises, this has been discussed at length elsewhere in this report however at the
properties owned and under contract by NoosaCare is proposed. concern of the community it is recommended that impact assessment be required once the development
There are three significant factors which will impact the aged care operating environment in the future exceed 10 dwellings. Affordable rental premises are, by definition, limited to small dwellings and it is
and which have influenced this strategy: recommended small dwellings continue to include any dwelling with a GFA not exceeding 100m2 (rather
than 75m2 as was advertised).
1. The large number of baby boomers, those born between 1946 and 1965, who are reaching later life
in the next decades and increasing demand for aged care services; The rezoning of #12 and 14 to Community Services could not be done now as it would be considered a
significant change warranting renotification, however can be considered in a future planning scheme
2. The focus by the government on Home Care subsidy in an effort to avoid higher cost residential review and if other lots are purchased by then that would also be considered. However, it is worth noting
care, resulting in the average age of residents rising, their level of care increasing and length of stay that uses of dwelling house (including secondary dwellings), community residences and small scale
reducing; and rooming accommodation (up to 5 bedroom) are all consistent uses in the Low Density Residential Zone,
3. The current shortage of nurses, care workers and support staff worsening in the years ahead. and since there are already established houses on the Carramar Street sites, modifying some of these
The concept is for secure retirement housing with a range of service and support options for the Noosa might suit short term aspirations without the need for planning applications.
community, together with affordable and convenient accommodation for Carramar staff. The facility will: Given Council is just considering the Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, it is not clear what
108
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.