Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 115, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
anywhere which is already happening at multiple zones around Noosa ,especially around school drop off
pick up and end of the work day .
22.2. Noosaville Other
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
23109017 37 Gibson Rd, Noosaville (currently operating as a garden and lifestyle centre) is a relatively large site in The subject site has a history of once being in the Future Urban Zone, then going to Attached Housing Amend the PSP11 Provision of
a good location, suitable for a mixed-use development with appropriate low impact commercial uses on with Noosa Plan 2006 then to District Centre with Noosa Plan 2020. It incorporates various business Affordable Rental Premises to
the ground floor and small dwelling units above. Submitter is seeking the District Centre Zone Code uses but no residential at this point. The site is generally surrounded by well-established single and two reflect the changes that the
identifies incentives for the Health and Wellbeing Precinct’, similar to those of the newly created ‘Doonella storey residential development. Residential uses on the site in a mixed use development may be affordable rental premises are
Street Precinct’. supported, however the allowance of a 3rd storey is considered to be a significant change and would applicable in some centre zones
The current provisions within the District Centre Zone does not allow for an economically feasible need to be subject to a future amendment process. and selected High Density
redevelopment of the site to support housing supply, housing choice, housing diversity and housing Consideration at this time to amend the GFA requirements for residential to not exceed business uses Residential Zones sites.
affordability within a mixed-use development. Owners have prepared plans for either a 2 storey (18 unit) would not be supported given the current 2 storey height limit and the need to retain business uses in the
or 3 storey (31 unit) mixed use development for the site. The housing typologies include a mix of floor District Centre zone.
areas ranging from 33m2 to 121m2, with commercial tenancies fronting Gibson Rd. This proposal could have merit and the submission may be considered further in future planning scheme
The Purpose and Overall Outcomes of the District Centre Zone Code must be amended to provide for reviews but no change to the current amendment package are recommended.
affordable rental premises within the Health and Wellbeing Precinct. The Table of Assessment for the
Health and Wellbeing Precinct shall be amended to remove the requirement for the residential GFA to
not exceed the GFA of the non-residential uses. The built form incentive provisions for height and gross Changes to the table of assessment for indoor sport and recreation to be code assessable outright and
floor area shall be provided for the site, where providing for affordable rental premises. PO41 (a) of the not in an existing building could also be considered in a future amendment however this is tied to the
District Zone Code must be changed from ‘ancillary to and support’ to ‘complementary to’, as well as the 300m² cap in GFA. Consideration of removing the restriction for a maximum GFA of 300m² for the site is
corresponding AO41.2 of the District Zone Code be deleted from the proposed amendments. Amend the for built form to maintain a domestic scale as the precinct is an interface between the District Centre and
Table of Assessment for the Health and Wellbeing Precinct to allow for Indoor Sport and Recreation as a adjoining residential uses. This could be considered in a later amendment with a review of the District
code assessable use on the site to not only be inside an existing building. The amendments must remove Centre zone. Likewise, the food and drink uses could be reviewed on the site as part of future review,
the restriction of 300m2 of GFA for the 3,856m2 site. however these are related to an existing approval on the site.
This submission requests Council change the proposed amendments to encourage development that is
economically viable for a property owner and that delivers, for residents of and visitors to Noosa, a As discussed elsewhere in this report it is recommended that the small dwelling definition remain at 100m²
development that celebrates environmental excellence, quality lifestyle and economic wellbeing. In this rather than 75m² as advertised and it will be optional to develop small dwellings, with incentives applying
regard, the owner seeks for the incentives for small dwelling units to be applied for residential if at least 3 out of 4 dwellings are small.
developments with a range of sizes. An amendment could be made to PSP11 for incentives to be provided
to developments that include an average of 75m2 units, rather than all units required to be less than
Given that the affordable rental premises provisions in the MDR and HDR zones (with a few site
75m2.
exceptions) PSP11 will be amended to reflect the changes that the affordable rental premises are
Considering the existing approval on the site, the owner also seeks for a small scale food and drink outlet applicable in some centre zone and selected HDR zoned sites.
to be a consistent code assessable use. To ensure this does not become the main use for the ground
floor, a restriction on size could be included within the Tables of Assessment.
The changes proposed by this submission are not considered significantly different requiring re-
advertising.
5802240 My property at 6 Wylah Street, Noosaville is adjoining the sites proposed to be rezoned from low density All the proposed amendment does is correct the current zoning that sees part of Sovereign Court That no change be made to
and residential to medium density housing in Sovereign Court Noosa, Swan Street. (developed around 1993) zoned Medium Density Residential and part zoned Low Density Residential. proposed amendments as a
5802343 Street traffic and Parking in Swan Street and Wylah Street is already saturated 7 days a week, the need The whole site of Sovereign Court was rezoned Special Residential under the 1985 planning scheme for result of this submission.
for additional on street parking would inconvenience residents even further. We have concerns regarding the development of 10 multiple dwelling units under a Group Title Plan. This would correct a zoning error
the impact on our privacy with medium density housing on our back fence. Inevitably there will be which occurred in 2006.
increased noise with additional residents, traffic, cars, animal noise, air conditioning etc. Overall negative No redevelopment or change to built form is envisaged.
impact upon the neighbourhood, facilities, transport, environment and parklands of the demands of an Pipi Crescent has only ever been zoned for single low density houses, unlike the properties at 181-185
increased population. Personally the lifestyle we currently enjoy was a conscious choice when I Weyba Road which have been zoned for units since the 1985 planning scheme.
purchased my home. I believe our lifestyle would be compromised with a change to medium density
housing on my back fence. The resale value and street appeal of my property will be reduced. Any redevelopment of older houses for new houses or for higher yields are subject to minimum floor
heights for flood mitigation. New builds are to capture stormwater on site and not worsen the onsite
5826463 The plan needs to include the residential properties of 6, 8 & 10 Pipi Cresent Noosaville, combined with drainage of neighbouring properties.
the retirement village on Swan Street. This will then make it a neat rectangle area for development and
also allow traffic to enter, via a back entrance, into their residences benefiting from Pipi Street entrance,
thus having a second entry.
The residences of 6 & 10 are already shaded, low lying and flooding areas (#8 was allowed to build 1
metre higher than 6 & 10 residences - mistake we should have objected to many years ago). I currently
have had to install, by Noosa Plumbing, 2 x submersible pumps at my house 6 Pipi Crescent attempting
to alleviate the current flooding problem. Medium density will not only make that situation worse, and I
purchased that house in 2001, when I managed numerous Commonwealth Bank Branches within the
area. It's progressively become worse, and this will exacerbate it.
The expansion of medium density needs to consider the future water inundation to those residences, as
medium density will again be built higher with the proposed medium density development. The streets in
Wylah have drains. Pipi does not. There is NO STORMWATER DRAIN in PIPI CRES - it is down the
street at the crossroad of Wylah St.
113
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.