Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 135, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Furthermore, transitioning these properties to the Medium Density Residential Zone is consistent with the
sustainable development goals outlined in the Noosa Plan 2020. It supports the efficient use of existing
infrastructure and services while promoting a balanced and vibrant community environment.
The potential benefits of this amendment extend beyond immediate property owners to the broader
community, fostering a more diverse and inclusive neighbourhood that enhances our overall quality of
life. By accommodating growth in a sustainable manner, Noosa can continue to thrive as a desirable place
to live, work, and visit.
I commend the Noosa Council's efforts in proactively addressing our community's housing needs through
Amendment No. 2 and supporting further density in high-amenity areas.
23108859 Request that 54 Solway Drive be rezoned to medium density, in line with the changes occurring in the 54 Solway Drive is in the Low Density Residential Zone, adjoining other Low Density Residential land, That no change be made to
surrounding areas. however there is Medium Density Residential land over the road. The site is affected by Biodiversity and proposed amendments as a
I strongly dislike the fact that Noosa operates on a complaint-based model where a single anonymous Bushfire overlays, given its proximity to National Park and established vegetation on and adjoining site. result of these submissions.
23108805 complaint can ruin a business and cause financial and physical stress. I have personally witnessed this The site is registered with the short stay letting local law.
happen to many small businesses, such as gyms, restaurants, cafes, and home-based businesses. Submitter’s concerns about complaints are noted. There is a process where complaints are investigated
Noosa does not support small businesses and imposes excessive red tape on those who are simply trying and the “accused” is given the opportunity to address concerns and show they are not offending laws or
23108802 to pay their bills and feed their families. This approach is detrimental to the local economy and discourages plans. They are usually given options and opportunities to bring a business into compliance. No Council,
entrepreneurial initiatives. including Noosa, is seeking to prosecute, or shut down legitimate small businesses but does have a duty
of care to uphold the planning scheme and local laws.
23094931 Fully support 102-110 Pacific Avenue, Sunshine Beach rezoning from Low Density Residential to Medium Support noted That no change be made to
Density Residential proposed amendments as a
Support Duke Street, Sunshine Beach. Rezoning from Tourist Accommodation to Neighbourhood Centre. result of this submission.
Fully Support Ben Lexcen Dr, Sunrise Beach rezoning from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential
23055058 Request for the neighbouring property 100 Pacific Avenue to also be included in the zoning change. This 100 Pacific Avenue is a house in the Low Density Residential Zone, adjoining the backpacker site That no change be made to
would be continuous for the MDR zoning and provide more housing in the future, aligning with the proposed to be included in Medium Density Residential. It is not considered appropriate to further extend proposed amendments as a
Council's Housing Strategy. the Medium Density Residential Zone at this point but it could be looked at a future planning scheme result of this submission.
review.
23101126 PBCA supports the inclusion of new definition of residential amenity and further recommends that the Support for provisions noted That no change be made to
definition be highlighted in the preamble to the Plan. Compliance is a matter for Development Assessment and Local Laws. proposed amendments as a
PBCA supports the proposed amendments to the Overall Outcomes of the LDR zone to ensure that the result of this submission.
There is no intention to reduce boundary setbacks to buildings and indeed some front setback and
character and ambience of this zone is protected, and the liveability of permanent residents is prioritised streetscape provisions are proposed to be strengthened.
and protected. Concerned how this will this be managed. There needs to be a mechanism for Council to
enforce this in the event of significant non-compliance. Support is noted for the use of church owned land for critical housing. The intent for any community
housing on these sites to be low rise and incorporate landscaping spaces between buildings.
Many new dwelling developments and redevelopments are not sensitive to the pre-established character
of neighbourhoods. Amendments are proposed that will clarify and strengthen requirements around In relation to the Innovation Zone the comments are noted. The site on the corner of Rufus Street and
streetscape and built form; these proposed amendments are strongly supported. Woodland Drive is located in the Innovation Zone.
We support proposed changes that will allow land zoned as MDR to accommodate a greater number of
smaller dwellings.
PBCA supports an increased number of smaller multiple dwellings in the MDR, dual occupancies to be
inconsistent on a lot of 600m2 or more as multiple dwellings in the form of small dwellings are preferred
in these lots. However not the loss of setbacks and landscaping as a “trade off’. Ensure that setback
provisions (particularly those that require soft landscaping between buildings and site boundaries) are
strictly enforced. There is growing community concern that much of the treescape that once existed in our
neighbourhoods has been lost as lots are redeveloped. It is important that any redevelopment, particularly
as we move to greater density, protects, and enhances our streetscapes.
PBCA supports the use of church owned land for disability emergency or crisis accommodation, subject
to the application of the usual assessment processes. The challenge will be to ensure that any
developments maintain the physical character of the Noosa Shire.
PBCA strongly supports any initiatives that further encourages the development of the Innovation zone at
Peregian Beach without compromising the visual amenity of the Rufous Street precinct. The Digital Hub
has proven to be a highly successful enterprise and we believe it has contributed positively to the
character and image of Peregian Beach.
While there are possibly limited opportunities for expansion of the Innovation zone at Peregian Beach,
there is potential for the site on the corner of Woodland Drive and Rufous Street to be developed along
the lines envisaged by the proposed amendments. PBCA supports the proposed amendments that
provide more detail and clarity on the nature and type of development in the zone
PBCA is pleased that the heights referred to in the Low Density Residential zone, the Medium Density
Residential zone and the High Density Residential zone are consistent with the community’s desire for
there not to be “high rise” developments in residential areas.
We note from the zoning maps provided as attachments to the amendments that it is proposed that the
Peregian Beach surf club be moved into the urban footprint. We are not clear as to the reason for this
change and would appreciate clarification as to the rationale for this proposal - would be concerned if the
133
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.