Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions

of 136

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn

Original PDF page 17, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

 Your Say    ECM         Submitter comments                                                                                               Response                                                                                                Recommendation
 Reference   reference
                         Current tourist accommodations are highly regulated, however, if the land is rezoned to High Density
                         Residential, future changes to the definition are all that is required to have severe impact to Unitywater
                         and an increase in ongoing cost to service for the Noosa community through the requirement to retrofit
                         significant and costly odour control enhancements to the Noosa WWTP.
                         This means that any odour complaint made to the regulator will be investigated and could result in action
                         against Unitywater that may lead to prosecution and costly plant modifications. In fact, in light of the new
                         environmental legislation, Unitywater would need to pre-emptively consider costly plant modifications
                         before any complaints are received, should this amendment be approved. These costs would be borne
                         by Unitywater customers.
 5778384                 I strongly vote for High Density Residential zoning. Tourist zoning and allowing short term rental and           Support for the proposed rezoning of Parkridge from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential   That no change to the proposed
                         AirBNB has proven inappropriate and intensely disturbing the peace that we bought into at Parkridge.             is noted.                                                                                               amendments be made as a result
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  of these submissions
 5799544                 Fully support proposed change of zone at Parkridge Noosa from Tourist to High Density Residential
 5800077                 WE SUPPORT AMENDMENT 2 as it relates to the Resort Drive Parkridge rezoning to high density
                         residences. We believe future developments and uses should be assessed for appropriateness for owner
                         occupied and long term leased residences. Thank you for this positive change."
 5749909                 I support the proposed changes. I own and reside in a villa in Parkridge and support the correction of our
                         zoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential.
                         Our community is 85% owner occupied, 14% permanent rental, only 7 STAs across the Parkridge
                         complex of 180+ units and it is important that our zoning reflects our residential status.
 5807956                 Supporting high density residential for Parkridge as STL experience is that it compromises security and
                         not appropriate
 5778404                 This is long overdue. The answer is YES.
 5778495                 We definitely agree that Parkridge Noosa should be classified as high density residential with no further
                         short term accommodation.
             23075001    Parkridge should have never been zoned as tourist accommodation or allowed short term stays such as
                         AIRBNB. Many people were unaware of the zoning at time of purchase and many have moved on
                         because of it. Understanding that the approvals already granted will stay, no more should be approved.
                         I am delighted that there could be a change of the Zoning to High Density Residential.
 5749942                 As a resident of Parkridge I support the rezoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density
                         Residential. Our development is predominantly owner occupied/residential with only 14% being
                         permanent rentals therefore the appropriate zoning should reflect that.
 5751390                 As resident owners in Parkridge, we support the correction of our zoning from Tourist Accommodation to
                         High Density Residential. We are a residential community, 85% owner occupied, 14% permanent rental
                         and just 7 STAs across 180 units. We feel that it is important to have zoning that reflects the current status
                         quo.
             23055158    Supports all proposed changes. Specifically, the return of the Parkridge Noosa site to residential from
                         Tourist Accommodation zoning. It is important that the true nature of use is reflected in the Noosa Plan,
                         and as an integrated residential community, values and amenity were negatively impacted by the Tourist
                         Accommodation zoning.
             23053923    Strongly supports the correction of zoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential as
                         approximately 85% of the more than 180+ units are owner occupied. Further 14% are permanent rental
                         with 7 units being short term accommodation.
 5759573                 There is a situation involving the zoning category at the Parkridge Noosa complex whereby early day off
                         the plan buyers were led to believe that they were buying their properties in a residential zone
                         When Noosa Council decided to introduce its short term accommodation policy Parkridge was deemed
                         to be a Resort Hotel. Even the chairperson of the Principal Body Corporate, who was appointed by the
                         Developer had been fooled. He wrote that he decided to buy into the community because he thought he
                         was buying into a residential apartment He also formally submitted a proposal to the PBC to block the
                         final decision
                         While this was going on the Developer was communicating with Council hence Parkridge became a
                         Resort Hotel. My understanding is that as a Resort Hotel management is exempt from the harsh Council
                         rules
                         Confusion reigns because there are other letting agents involved so we see individual complaint signs.
                         One concludes these owners are under the influence of the Council rules'
                         This background may no longer be important due to the closing down of the restaurant which was partly
                         influenced by out-of-control functions with some customers linked to short term rentals



                                                                                                                                            15
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
Log in to download the original file

Attachment 1 Table of submissions.pdf · 2.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.