Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 17, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Current tourist accommodations are highly regulated, however, if the land is rezoned to High Density
Residential, future changes to the definition are all that is required to have severe impact to Unitywater
and an increase in ongoing cost to service for the Noosa community through the requirement to retrofit
significant and costly odour control enhancements to the Noosa WWTP.
This means that any odour complaint made to the regulator will be investigated and could result in action
against Unitywater that may lead to prosecution and costly plant modifications. In fact, in light of the new
environmental legislation, Unitywater would need to pre-emptively consider costly plant modifications
before any complaints are received, should this amendment be approved. These costs would be borne
by Unitywater customers.
5778384 I strongly vote for High Density Residential zoning. Tourist zoning and allowing short term rental and Support for the proposed rezoning of Parkridge from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential That no change to the proposed
AirBNB has proven inappropriate and intensely disturbing the peace that we bought into at Parkridge. is noted. amendments be made as a result
of these submissions
5799544 Fully support proposed change of zone at Parkridge Noosa from Tourist to High Density Residential
5800077 WE SUPPORT AMENDMENT 2 as it relates to the Resort Drive Parkridge rezoning to high density
residences. We believe future developments and uses should be assessed for appropriateness for owner
occupied and long term leased residences. Thank you for this positive change."
5749909 I support the proposed changes. I own and reside in a villa in Parkridge and support the correction of our
zoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential.
Our community is 85% owner occupied, 14% permanent rental, only 7 STAs across the Parkridge
complex of 180+ units and it is important that our zoning reflects our residential status.
5807956 Supporting high density residential for Parkridge as STL experience is that it compromises security and
not appropriate
5778404 This is long overdue. The answer is YES.
5778495 We definitely agree that Parkridge Noosa should be classified as high density residential with no further
short term accommodation.
23075001 Parkridge should have never been zoned as tourist accommodation or allowed short term stays such as
AIRBNB. Many people were unaware of the zoning at time of purchase and many have moved on
because of it. Understanding that the approvals already granted will stay, no more should be approved.
I am delighted that there could be a change of the Zoning to High Density Residential.
5749942 As a resident of Parkridge I support the rezoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density
Residential. Our development is predominantly owner occupied/residential with only 14% being
permanent rentals therefore the appropriate zoning should reflect that.
5751390 As resident owners in Parkridge, we support the correction of our zoning from Tourist Accommodation to
High Density Residential. We are a residential community, 85% owner occupied, 14% permanent rental
and just 7 STAs across 180 units. We feel that it is important to have zoning that reflects the current status
quo.
23055158 Supports all proposed changes. Specifically, the return of the Parkridge Noosa site to residential from
Tourist Accommodation zoning. It is important that the true nature of use is reflected in the Noosa Plan,
and as an integrated residential community, values and amenity were negatively impacted by the Tourist
Accommodation zoning.
23053923 Strongly supports the correction of zoning from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential as
approximately 85% of the more than 180+ units are owner occupied. Further 14% are permanent rental
with 7 units being short term accommodation.
5759573 There is a situation involving the zoning category at the Parkridge Noosa complex whereby early day off
the plan buyers were led to believe that they were buying their properties in a residential zone
When Noosa Council decided to introduce its short term accommodation policy Parkridge was deemed
to be a Resort Hotel. Even the chairperson of the Principal Body Corporate, who was appointed by the
Developer had been fooled. He wrote that he decided to buy into the community because he thought he
was buying into a residential apartment He also formally submitted a proposal to the PBC to block the
final decision
While this was going on the Developer was communicating with Council hence Parkridge became a
Resort Hotel. My understanding is that as a Resort Hotel management is exempt from the harsh Council
rules
Confusion reigns because there are other letting agents involved so we see individual complaint signs.
One concludes these owners are under the influence of the Council rules'
This background may no longer be important due to the closing down of the restaurant which was partly
influenced by out-of-control functions with some customers linked to short term rentals
15
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.