Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 30, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Noting that local governments have the authority to make any local law “necessary for the good rule and
government of its area”, NRAUSTA urges adoption of a suite of additional provisions in residential and
rural zones, including:
STA land rates that at least match commercial rates, and/or a bed tax to ensure recovery of the full
economic impact of tourists;
cap at 60 the number of nights each STA property can be rented each year;
cap at four the number of bedrooms that can be offered in each STA;
cap at two (including children) the number of occupants in each bedroom;
require one off-street parking for each rentable bedroom;
and for re-registration of each STA that has been the subject of a complaint, a comprehensive on-site
review of its compliance.
Council’s aim should be to not only constrain further STA expansion, but to restore the balance of resident
to visitor numbers that existed prior to the advent of Air B n’B and STAs. Council’s STA objectives should
be detailed in a Statement of Principle for all stakeholders.
23108865 The NSRRA has observed how the tourism sector has also been applying pressure on Council to provide Support for the proposed amendments is noted. That no change to proposed
more housing for workers. After a decade of the tourism industry dominating and exploiting Noosa’s Council continues to lobby state government on the regulation of STA and existing use rights provisions amendments be made as a result
residential precincts for commercial use (Short Stay Accommodation) they now have the temerity to around STA in residential zones. of these submissions
complain there’s nowhere for their cleaning and hospitality staff to live.
It must also be noted that prior to the proliferation of Short Stay Accommodation in Noosa’s suburbs,
large, detached houses were once rented as share houses by lower paid workers. This suits the often-
transient workforce of the tourism sector.
The Short Stay Accommodation investment boom was followed by the mass migration of southerners into
SEQ after Covid hit. The tourism industry fluctuates and the impact of Council’s efforts to curb the
proliferation of Short Stay Accommodation will hopefully take effect over time.
The NSRRA supports the policy of making Short Stay Accommodation premises an inconsistent use in
medium to high density zones. Considering such measures can only be described as shutting the gate
aer the horse has well and truly bolted, it’s unlikely to have an immediate impact on the multitude of
existing residential premises used for tourism accommodation.
NSRRA requests Council continue exploring options such as increased regulation to minimise the impact
of the Short Stay Accommodation sector on the housing mix. Despite the Short Stay Accommodation
industry lamenting the cost of regulation, the NSRRA notes a recent report by Alan Kohler on ABC News
quoted a study indicating the profits from short term rentals are on average 80% higher than those of
permanent rentals. Hence investors will continue attempting to procure premises for Short Stay
Accommodation, push the boundaries of compliance and resist pressure to return these enterprises to
the long-term rental market.
23109447 Some of the proposed changes are a step in the right direction – but too late. Others are concerning. Concerns of STA proliferation are noted. Council is limited in its jurisdiction with regard to reducing the That no change to proposed
The effect of STA growth on resident amenity across Noosa is well documented with varying levels of number of STAs. If a property is lawfully operating STA by either a development approval or by existing amendments be made as a result
adverse impact. Eg: I have lived in the area and raised a family in a normal sized family home for over 50 use rights, they can continue to operate despite the proposed amendments coming into effect. The of these submissions
years. We did sell, downsized, and our large home was demolished and replaced with a large ultra proposed amendments are not retrospective. Under the Planning Act existing use rights and development
modern house and we moved into a residential apartment building on Gympie Tce, and within several approvals are enshrined.
years we are the only non-STA occupants. The proposed amendments will make STA an inconsistent use in all Residential zones going forward.
Council proposes making STAs an inconsistent use in medium and high-density residential zones, but The proposed amendments will limit further growth in STA in residential zones. Future development in
acknowledges that existing rights over-ride STA laws. The changes appear meaningless when residential zones is intended for permanent residential dwellings only. The proposed amendments will not
enforcement is impossible and loophole result in an increase in STA.
Council’s objective to restrict STA rentals to no more than four times a year for a maximum of 15 days on Council continues to lobby state government on the regulation of STA and existing use rights provisions
each occasion is laudable but not enforceable. around STA in residential zones.
The proposed two or three off-street car parking spaces for a dwelling used for STA is insufficient, and a
more appropriate requirement is one off-street car space for each rentable bedroom.
Management of STA laws and enforcement are a long way from satisfactory as Council has been told
frequently.
As previously noted the State’s ‘existing use rights’ planning provision is a significant hurdle for Council
to fulfil its stated commitment to restore the Noosa community’s precedence over visitors and investors.
Council’s aim should be to not only constrain further STA expansion, but to restore the balance of resident
to visitor numbers that existed prior to the advent of AirBNB and STAs. Determined enforcement of the
available laws, and adoption of further comprehensive and stringent responses is essential.
5801814 Investigate whether the Brisbane Council’s STA’s regulations would be applicable to Noosa, and whether Council has taken a position on existing use rights for houses in the Low Density Residential zone. That no change to proposed
our council’s 6-year-old advice regarding existing use rights is still valid in light of Brisbane Council’s Council continues to lobby state government on the regulation of STA and existing use rights provisions amendments be made as a result
present STA regulations; around STA in residential zones. of these submissions
Re-investigate the ‘existing use’ legislation, to determine whether the previous legal advice (obtained Secondary dwellings are permitted as accepted development and can only be occupied by a permanent
before 2020) is still correct; resident and cannot be used for short term accommodation. Ongoing compliance checks on the use of
secondary dwellings is a key focus area of the short stay letting local laws team.
28
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.